Are you actually telling me that the third pic is authentic? That they magically clarified the image to where the lighting doesn't even match the background? And it's common knowledge that not all Pentagon footage has been released. How are you even arguing this? Are you also going to argue that 28 pages of the 9/11 Report weren't redacted? If there's nothing to hide, why hide it?
Regular office fires absolutely can weakn steel. No one claimed the fired melted steel other steel buildings have collapsed because of fire Wtc 7 is no mystery and no key to anything. All of your claims have lond ago been debunked
Third picture SOMETHING is molten,what it is is unknown.....A leap to call it 'steel' Suuuuuuuuuuuuuure,your 'career' happens to be in video,and you can't tell the difference between a poor quality image,and 'photoshop'
No, why would you say that? I see, you didn't make yourself clear in the first response. I thought you were talking about, or including the first pic, which is of course, unaltered. The rest is obvious. All the footage has been examined and transcribed, and when I find the link again, I will post it for you. No, why would you state such a stupid thing? I can think of many reasons regarding diplomacy, national security etc. Just apply yourself for a little while and it will come.
Top left to right: a) Is a known fake b) Is a shot from the cleanup operations and that is where the cutting crew worked Bottom left to right: c) Is of unknown provenance so I'll leave that one until its origin is confirmed d) Is probably copper from the failing transformers near that site. He made the same error I did because you didn't explain yourself fully.
If you would care to debate the science and circumstances behind 7WTC's collapse in a thread, I would be keen to join in.
There is one, taken from the Citgo station (now demolished) across from the Pentagon, but owing to the limitations of CCTV (speeds etc) it only shows a blurry image. For an in-depth analysis of the camera limitations, see the following link: http://11-settembre.blogspot.com.au/2007/02/why-dont-pentagon-videos-clearly-show.html
I kinow there is,but thewre shouln't have to be! After all,there as no video of the B-25 that hit the Empire State building,yet there's no question it did
Sigh, there was wreckage. You have not been on an investigation of aircraft accidents so would not know what happens. I like to fly small aircraft but due to what happens during an airliner accident, I don't like to fly in the spam cans of the air.