A question for white nationalists. How will you achieve your goals?

No, it's closer to "it doesn't matter". That's typically the answer given to irrelevant questions like yours.

 

Now you and your ilk claim that the cost of welfare is destroying the country, so what is the % it is costing?

 

......err.....a revolution.....? I guess......?
White people are still the majority of the ruling class right?

Even brown and black people have high birth rate, it is still hard for them to upgrade their social status.

The ruling class (even higher than the average upper class) whites may think so differently compare to the middle class white, all in all they just share same race but they don't have the common benefits!

Sad but true.

 

It's all very well saying people shouldn't. The fact remains that they do, so how are you going to legislate against pregnancy-and remember that it isn't only your dreaded "certain groups" (Hispanics and Blacks) who are having unwanted babies. Non-Hispanic white women are having unintended pregnancies at 38/1000.
http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/FB-Unintended-Pregnancy-US.html

 

It's actually very relevant. Your gripe is the cost of helping those with babies to support. So how much is it costing you, personally? I mean, you must surely have an idea otherwise you wouldn't be complaining.

 

I think that early sex education, easy access to contraseptives & a relaxation of morality police would cut child bearing among the demographic you fear.
Flowers, maybe some help with the cooking, clean up etc. might help with the birth stats among the Arians.

 

That's not my argument in this thread.

- - - Updated - - -

Has nothing to do with my claim that minorities are having children for citizenship and welfare.

- - - Updated - - -

It's a disadvantage to the group who has to pay the bills for everyone else when it comes time for them to have kids.

 

Asking a question is the "dying gasp of a failed argument"?!?!!?!?!?

 

It's interesting....while some posters on this thread clearly embrace the ideas of the "white nationalists"....

NONE of them want to admit to being one.

Which I guess we should take as a good sign....it's either too embarrassing for them to admit or they are too cowardly to admit it. Either way, an indication that they are an isolated group on the fringe who have to hide in the shadows and only "hint" at their beliefs because ...even others who might share other political views with them on things like taxes, spending, Government size, etc......would REJECT them if they were honest.

 

I've said for a long time that you can gauge the progress made in the US on race relations by the inverse proportion of the efforts white supremacists put forth in spewing their views and avoiding being appropriately labeled by those same views.

 

Fair enough. I just dont think current generations of people can see much past their own nose. So agree to disagree there.


I think sterilization might go to far, however, I wouldnt be above requiring birth control to be used IF you are on government dime.

But I am sure the Catholic church would never stand for that either.

 

True.....the fact the hard-core racists have to HIDE what they believe....both to spare themselves embarrassment...and their political allies on other issues (who are enablers).....or any political affiliation.....is a good thing.

Oh, they have their "code-words" and their "It's not about hating minorities, it's about defending oppressed white people" blather.....but they will never ADMIT what they are publicly.

Their cowardice is the proof that they've lost...or are losing.

 

lib mantra 25...call of your opponents racists
I think those who like to race bait are the BIGGEST racists...so you admit you are a racist?

 

It seems to be a new tactic, this twisted mislabelling.

I presume some do it simply because they think it's somehow controversial or provocative. The net result, though....dickery and the enabling of racism.

 

Not sure where you got the idea that I support illegal immigration of any kind.

No amount of black on white violence is even remotely as bad as slavery was. I don't see white people being whipped in the streets or hanged from trees.

This is why it is impossible for non-racists to take racist arguments seriously...because of analogies like this. America has become less oppressive as it has gotten more diverse, and in really obvious ways.

Europe had far more white people, then and now. If white people were the key variable, they should be far ahead of us.

Racists seem to think it does for things like crime rates...why is it suddenly different when it does not support the conclusion you want?

If you have a more objective way of measuring economic power, feel free to post it. All PPP means is that some cultures are less demanding. The items in each culture are NOT the same...they are considered analogous by whoever is doing the measurement.

PP would not, for example, say that a given person could buy an iPhone for the same amount of labor. They could buy what they consider to be equivalent perhaps, but it would not be the same product. So if the culture is used to a lower standard of living, the PPP measurement would show as analogous, when it is clearly not.

LOL! Did you just get here from 1989? We've heard that declaration before.

OK.

Have fun.

It means people are accountable for what they say. The fact that I might criticize you or call you names or refuse to buy your stuff because I don't like things you have expressed is NOT evidence you do not have free speech. I'm allowed an opinion on what you say as well.

I've never advocated violence or government oppression on anyone for expressing an idea. "Persecution" in this context = criticism or things like boycotts.

Are you talking about Japan or China? Because we were told the same thing about Japan back in the 80s. And Japan is even more genetically and culturally homogeneous than China...How'd that work out?

I agree. But it would be far too chaotic for any one group to bully the others. You can have a mix where there is no majority. In a nation of 20% hispanics and 25% blacks and 40% white and 15% Asians (for example), there is no racial majority. And such a society would be far more resistant to racial oppression.

I would not want to see the white majority replaced with a black majority. I'd want to see all majorities removed.

Are you sure they would all starve? Wealthy and middle class blacks (for example) would survive just fine. Your example is not based on race, it is based on socio-economics.

"We" don't know anything of the sort...that is an opinion you are projecting as if it were fact.

The only fact here is that such predictions have been made countless times within my lifetime, and so far, they have all failed to manifest. THAT is 100% fact, not opinion.

 

If you believe people have personality traits specific to a race, you are a racist by definition.

It's not an insult, it's a label. Like calling someone a capitalist or a liberal. They might take those terms as incults, but they are legitimate labels based on beliefs.