"Affluenza Mom" complains about jail cell. lol

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-affluenza-mom-arraignment-20160108-story.html

I don't even know where to begin...

However I'm happy that her and her disgusting son will get the book thrown at them this time...

The disgusting mother, when it's all said and done will get a year, and the son once his probation is revoked will get at least 10.

I'm glad they pulled this little stunt because it ironically allowed justice (the kid screwed it all up now he is going to hang for his nonsense, his whole cushy sentence is gone and mommy is going to prison too) ......

I'm happy these rat(*)(*)(*)(*)s - er at least half of them are in custody...

 

OK, first off I find no redeeming value in this woman. That said, please explain the crime she committed. I don't think there is one. Prior to crossing the border, which the idiot did himself, there was no crime.

Mr affluneza is an adult, his legal issues are his and no one else is privy to that. His probation office cannot and did not tell Mrs Mom affluneza what Mr affluneza could do as it relates to travel. For all Mrs Mom affluneza knew travel was agreed to.

Cheers
Labour

 

From the article:

 

Aiding and abetting? Harboring a fugitive? Conspiracy to flee justic? She's criminal scum as is her hideous son.

 

Just thinking technically here:

The crime of aiding, if it happened, happened in Mexico. Mexico is not within the jurisdiction of the state of Texas.

Did Mr affluenza require aid to cross the border? Was he even a fugitive prior to crossing the border? It seems that his movements within the state of Texas were legal, right up to the border. He made the decision to jump across,

Is it realistic that legally, with official knowledge, Mrs Mom affluenza know the status of Mr affluenza? I don't think so.

Is there an affirmative obligation for a citizen to know the legal status of another adult? No.

Cheers
Labour

 

Harboring a fugitive?
Meaning that you are helping them to hide out or keeping them in your home etc...


Harboring a fugitive refers to the crime of knowingly hiding a wanted criminal from the authorities.
Federal and state laws, which vary by state, govern the crime of harboring a fugitive.
Although supplying funds may make one an accessory after the fact, supplying financial assistance to a fugitive does not rise to the level of harboring or concealing.

The federal statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1071, requires proof of four elements: (1) proof that a federal warrant had been issued for the fugitive' s arrest, (2) that the accused had knowledge that a warrant had been issued, (3) that the accused actually harbored or concealed the fugitive, and (4) that the accused intended to prevent the fugitive' s discovery or arrest.

 

Are you drinking ? Your argument is absurd !! Are you supposing that you can only aid a fugitive to escape US Justice in the US ? Is getting across the border with Mexico somehow a safe zone, where you are no longer aiding and abetting a fugitive from US Justice? Why have extradition treaties then ?

 

Well heres the code.


TEX PE. CODE ANN. § 38.05 : Texas Statutes - Section 38.05: HINDERING APPREHENSION OR PROSECUTION



(a) A person commits an offense if, with intent to hinder the arrest, prosecution, conviction, or punishment of another for an offense or, with intent to hinder the arrest, detention, adjudication, or disposition of a child for engaging in delinquent conduct that violates a penal law of the state, or with intent to hinder the arrest of another under the authority of a warrant or capias, he:

(1) harbors or conceals the other;

(2) provides or aids in providing the other with any means of avoiding arrest or effecting escape; or

(3) warns the other of impending discovery or apprehension.

(b) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a)(3) that the warning was given in connection with an effort to bring another into compliance with the law.

(c) Except as provided by Subsection (d), an offense under this section is a Class A misdemeanor.

(d) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree if the person who is harbored, concealed, provided with a means of avoiding arrest or effecting escape, or warned of discovery or apprehension is under arrest for, charged with, or convicted of a felony, including an offense under Section 62.102, Code of Criminal Procedure, or is in custody or detention for, is alleged in a petition to have engaged in, or has been adjudicated as having engaged in delinquent conduct that violates a penal law of the grade of felony, including an offense under Section 62.102, Code of Criminal Procedure, and the person charged under this section knew that the person they harbored, concealed, provided with a means of avoiding arrest or effecting escape, or warned of discovery or apprehension is under arrest for, charged with, or convicted of a felony, or is in custody or detention for, is alleged in a petition to have engaged in, or has been adjudicated as having engaged in delinquent conduct that violates a penal law of the grade of felony.

http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/txstatutes/PE/8/38/38.05

 

Of course she'd be whining about her cell. Whadda expect from someone like her? Someone should tell her their plush 5-star jail cell is being occupied, so shut up. She's stupid enuf to believe they'd have one......

 

Really? thinking technically?

C'mon man..... We have laws because people like to use that logic...

 

Seriously, are you kidding? The mother knew exactly what her little baby boy's situation was - he violated his probation, she got scared that they'd punish her little boy and she plotted to get him out of the country and did it....it's called aiding and abetting.

 

How can "stress" be a defense to anything...what a joke.....affluenza...bs....its stress.......

 

I can't believe I read this stuff...........

 

Throw her in gen-pop at the men's facility.

See if she prefers those conditions better.

 

She's a parent. She's responsible for the attitude of this kid that killed others and didn't give a damn.

 

The mom may serve months and be fined the son will probably not set in jail at all. If you think that he doesn't have one of the best attorneys in the state backing him up then America is in for a shock. Daddy will have to pay big bucks that's about it.

 

"Fleeing Jurisdiction"

 

Obstruction, aiding and abetting, and there has too be something else they can her for. Lucky for her being an ******** is not a criminal offense. That said though if ********ness was a crime we would never have enough jail cells to fit all of the ********s in.

 

they have tons of money, I doubt they will get the max... and even if they do, they will be rich when they get out, not like they have to work hard to save for retirement or anything

 

Interesting, no federal warrant....
No warrant, ergo, no prior knowledge...
All else was outside jurisdiction....

The lady will go free....

Cheers
Labou

 

Within the jurisdiction of Texas.

Cheers
Labour

 

Stipulated, all of it.

At what point was a crime committed?

Cheers
Labour

 

The suspect is an adult.

Cheers
Labour

 

Can we prove mom pushed the son across the border? He was legal to that point. Crossing was his choice.

Cheers
Labour

 

Right, where her crime is alleged to have occurred.