America's sexual deviation & decadence over the line

Yes. You are free to try to persuade anyone you want to your way of thinking. And Disney is free to listen to what you have to say or to tell you to go pound sand. And I am free to see the movie or not see the movie... or make my own movie. That's the way a free society works.

What sexual content?

You have made quite a leap of "logic" there my friend. Your hyperbole aside, there is no rational relationship between a trans-gender cartoon stingray and pedophilia.

 

Pedophiles harm another person, transgender people do not. I see no similarities
I see no problem with exposing children to gay fish, married fish, straight fish, Christian fish, Martian fish, black fish, white fish, green fish and so on. I've seen the moral decay argument used before - it was when black people started being minor (and then major characters). Same argument - same logic
No one cares what extremists Muslims believes except right wing con jobs.

 

Transgender, that's what sexual content. Children, a cartoon for children, that is the connection, sex and children.

 

LOL... liberal damage control for the gay community. They really stepped in it this time.

Hey gay folks.... we dont care if your gay. get a gun and learn to protect yourself. These liberals are pushing a narrative that gay shame makes you a terrorist.

Gay sex on television and film is not the issue for me its sex in general. All it serves is a distraction from the story line. If a film or tv show has a good story you dont need all this shock and awe sex scenes. Most of the truly great films have no sex whatsoever in them. How hollywood has not figured this out is beyond me. There is a big percentage of the public turned off by it and it costs them revenue... big time.

 

I think exposing children to sexual issues of any sort is abusive to children.

Now if you want to compare me and my thinking to racism, first consider this, I am arguing against the abuse of children on moral grounds. Republicans argued on moral grounds against the democrats enslaving, lynching, segregating and other civil rights abuses of blacks. If you want to take a contrary position to mine, you'd have to say you were in favor of enslaving, lynching, segregation, and other civil rights abuses of blacks. Because I am against abusing children on moral grounds, you are in favor of it. You are on the wrong side morally.

As for muslims, the libs don't care about offending or discriminating against any religion except muslims.

 

The only slippery slope here is the homophobic one you are traveling. Anyone who takes the time to create multiple threads
wailing about gay people having the audacity of coming out of the closet and walking in the light of day as you have done needs
to be exposed as a possible danger to gay people.

Only a person who is obsessed would take time from the children he is supposed
to be raising and waste that time posting thread after thread about gay people on a silly internet blog ... and we
have seen the tragic consequences of not notifying the authorities of people who have such obsessions.

 

Pedophilia? Watching a cartoon is pedophilia? You are a very confused person.

 

Well, it's obvious that you are wrong and the tell is that right off the bat you chose to attack me. You say I'm a homophobe. So you resort to personally attack me which is of course against forum rules, but also it's a common fallacy. It's called attacking the messenger.

And of course you have no counter argument, no excuse for exposing children to adult sexual issues. No reason, no explanation. A complete absence of an argument.

I've created multiple threads wailing about gay people? Most of my threads are about politics.

I don't care about gays coming out except to say that it is ridiculous. I don't hear about straights coming out. In fact, gay or straight, I don't want to know. What you do in the bedroom is your problem.

I'm worried about all children, but I'm not raising any at this time. But for you to want to criminalize people for what they think then you should join the thought police. I'm not obsessed about gays, GBLT whatever. Couldn't care less. Don't want to even think about it. But leave the children alone. I'm worried about the danger to children and you are worried about the danger I pose to gays? I think you overestimate my power. But you go ahead and put in a call to the thought police.

It's really stupid to compare me to the Orlando shooter. I mean, really stupid.

 

How does transgenderism constitute sexual content?

 

It's an adult sexual subject. It's not something small children should be concerned with or exposed to.

 

At least you are honest about why you don't like gays instead of using religion as an excuse.

 

Another one missing the point completely. It's not about the gays, it's about the children.

 

He's freaking out about the idea that a 9-10 year old kid is exposed to sexuality(of any sort, perverted or not.) And I agree. Childhood is a rare, once in a lifetime experience and they don't need to be "questioning" whether they're a guy or a girl or not. Or having "suggestions" that those questions are okay, because it's really not.

Biologically, 100% of them are either male or female. Psychologically, they may be more or less masculine or feminine, depending on their psychology but it still doesn't mean they're the opposite gender. I find myself to be quite the aesthetic person, but I know I'm a dude.

These questions should be reserved for middle-to JR high(and college). You know, where they have psychiatrists! The kids should just be kids. Agreeing fully with Patriotnews here.

 

Right on! Childhood is confusing enough without some degenerate putting thoughts into their heads. I wonder how many parents would actually do this to their children? Would or should that be considered a form of child abuse?

 

Kids don't think of this kind of stuff. They care about playing. If they are obsessing about their genitalia or their sex, then they should be seeing a REAL psychiatrist and not a "gender therapist" either. That is NOT normal.

 

It has been reported that 75 to 80% of children and teens who experience this "gender confusion" will outgrow it by adulthood. Imagine pumping up a child with potentially dangerous hormones to actually stop or delay their normal pubertal phase.

When I was a little girl, I wanted to be a kitty for a while. I would wear kitty ears and put a sock sticking out of the back of my panties for a tail. Thank goodness my parents didn't take me seriously. Lol.

 

A lot of these people suggesting for Sex ed for these young children, etc don't have any idea what it's like. I can speak from personal experience: I was raped at the age of 9. It fundamentally changed my entire psychology, making me obsessed with sexual behavior in general. Luckily, I channeled these things into productive means but I know that others probably would not be able to. I know that it was overwhelming(and scary) at the time.

So this idea that just because kids are impressionable, means you have to impress THIS particular topic on them, is just flat out wrong. Kids should be absolved from this, until they hit puberty.

 

The counter-argument to your rant is obvious - there is no "danger" to children. If they are old enough to understand the
sexual (and it's a big stretch to call it that) references made in cartoons and animated films from Disney, then they are old enough
to discuss it. For all the other children, the references will pass right over their heads.

And honestly, if you "couldn't care less," you wouldn't have made this thread in the first place - and the fact that it is an obsession
is clearly visible in your asinine attempts to link all gay people to pedophiles.

 

I'm so sorry to hear that.

I really do think that this type of confusion over your sex or your gender is related to early childhood trauma of some kind. I don't think it should ever even be considered TBH.

Now, while I can't get up specific statistics for transgender people, I know that suicide rates have risen exponentially since around the 1950s and 1960s, just about the time the first "sex change" operations were being performed. All this "help" the liberals try to give people really only hurts them, IMO.

They act as if these people will DIE if they don't have a sex change operation or hormonal therapy. Well, how did they manage around the 1950s and before? Suicide rates back then were relatively low. They are sky high now, especially amongst the transgender population.

- - - Updated - - -

Leave children alone and keep them away from your sick agenda, you bunch of Dr. Frankensteins.

 

I don't have a problem with sex ed, like what I learned in middle school and high school, using protection, learning about STDs, learning anatomy, etc. Transgenderism is just effing weird though. If a child expresses something like that, they should be brought to a reputable psychiatrist and not one who is going to send the child off to a gender therapist. Of course a gender therapist is going to say that the child is a transgender. That's how they make their $$.

 

Imo, it was a gift and a curse. I found the outlet known as masturbation which gave me both pleasure and a release from stress. And at the same time, I will admit that it kind of has hindered my own social expectations for love. How soon is too soon? Etc. Well, of top priority for me right now is to get my financial life in order. But I think that dating is going to be a bit of a unique challenge for me.

Of course, I'm well aware of consent and everything that goes with that(I'm a gentleman by nature.) It's just, I admit that the very topic is beyond reproach for me sometimes. Psychologically, I don't want to come off too strong, etc. The end result is that I'd rather not make any sort of move.(And yeah, that's what keeps me in the single department lol)

All of these confusing factors and perhaps hindered development, is why I think kids should be kids. You start them off right, and they'll end up right. I'd let my child grow to believe they can achieve whatever they want. But in love and romance, I'd teach discipline, patience and trust as the most important things.

Communication is especially vital IMO. The more people talk, the more they'll understand.

 

I agree with you 100%. So sorry that you had to go through that, and I can understand your predicament. You probably have a difficult time with trusting another human being after being abused as a child.

 

It depends(and trust isn't really it I think. Does the word "familiarity" make more sense here?). I do have trust of my grandmother(my legal caretaker for all these years), except when she combs my hair so damn violently . But when it comes to other people in general, I do have to warm up and get to know them. But also, from all the bullying and everything, I don't like opposition in general. Which is why I hesitate. Hearing "no" or anything like that is a disappointment(one that I accept from almost anyone, I mean. If it happens enough times, anyone can get the hint.)

So why a political career? I have no idea, other than my love for intellectualism. But politics is less intellectual, and more of that same dirty mud that's useless to me.

 

I'm not sure that answers the question.

 

Maybe you should be a teacher of politics or something like that. You certainly do seem well versed in the subject, and if you taught you wouldn't have to actually BE a politician and get all dirty with the other pigs in the mud.