Let me show you some interesting views about tragedy. Over whelming preponderance of evidence along with expert testimony from the late 30 year demolition veteran the world can see the perfectly timed demolition sequence, the thermate cutter patents released earlier that year designed specifically for cutting very thick material very fast and the precise demolition sequence used to pull building 7. Debunkers deny the existence of exothermic cutters. Watch this and this What is claimed is: 1. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising: cutting flame generating means disposed within said inner cavity; activating means operatively associated with said cutting flame generating means to generate a cutting flame to cut said target material; and wherein said apparatus is structured to be positioned a standoff distance from said surface of said target material when said apparatus is placed on said surface of said target material. 2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said cutting flame generating means has a thermite charge. 3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said thermite charge includes a powder comprising, by weight, about 15% to 20% aluminum, about 78% to 85% CuO, about 1% to 3% SiC, and about 0.2% to 4.0% nitrocellulose. 4. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said thermite charge includes parts, by weight, about 16% to 18% aluminum, about 80% to 83% CuO, about 1% to 2% SiC, and about 0.5% to 2% nitrocellulose. 5. The apparatus of claim 1, further including a directional foil positioned in said elongated nozzle for focusing said cutting flame against said target material. 6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a generally cylindrical volume. 12. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said inner cavity defines a predetermined volume to accommodate a sufficient amount of said cutting flame generating means to ensure effective cutting action on a particular thickness of target material. 17. The method of claim 16, wherein said positioning said cutting flame generating means includes placing a thermite charge in a charge tube and positioning said charge tube in said inner cavity of said housing. 25. An apparatus for cutting a target material having a surface to be cut comprising: a second housing having a nozzle channel positionable opposite to said nozzle channel of said first housing to permit cutting of said material in two directions, said second housing being connected to said first housing; and wherein said connection between said housings comprises a fixed connection and a pivotal connection between said housings. 29. The apparatus of claim 20, further including means disposed in said housing for electrically activating said cutting flame generating means Well, we can believe it or not, but I think it`s quite interesting theory
The World trade towers had an aluminum skin ... It was NOT a brick and mortar building.. and NO demolition expert has any experience in taking down such a building cantilevered off a central core.
Do you deny the 2.25 sec of 9.8 m/s^2 acceleration by WTC7 ? Do you deny the total destruction of WTC1, 2 & 7 ? The preponderance of evidence points to controlled demolition of all three buildings ...... what do you want?
Neither of which is a typical sign of controlled demolition. Also, neither of your points is true ... but since neither is a sign of CD, it matters little.
Given that there are documents widely accepted as authority on the subject that specify any case of complete destruction of a structure should be investigated VERY well, and in the case of WTC1, 2 & 7, what constitutes "not complete demolition" and why do you choose to disagree with NFPA fire code?
The conspiracy theories about 9-11 are utter crap.. Gravity is very predictable.. Things fall down, not sideways. The planes cut the spine out of the building, they didn't knock it over.
So ..... did the alleged "FLT11" & "FLT175" cut ALL of the core columns? or just some of them, and how is it to be known one way or the other? It makes a difference, and since no forensic examination of ground zero was ever done, we may never know.......
Oh joy, another 9/11 theory which ignores the fact that the building collapses have been explained for 6+ years. Another theory destined to spend a brief moment of time being thrown around the bowels of the internet and then never seeing the light of day. Goody..
All of your theories were disproven by popular mechanics in 2005. http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/1227842
I hope all of the viewers have seen this info. September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M (2:42:55 time mark) The part about building 7 starts at the 4:30:48 time mark. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-V1CiuGMJo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw
Thank you ever so much for that bit of info.... and now a bit about that WTC tower wall.... "The World Trade Center towers used high-strength, load-bearing perimeter steel columns called Vierendeel trusses that were spaced closely together to form a strong, rigid wall structure, supporting virtually all lateral loads such as wind loads, and sharing the gravity load with the core columns." From Wikipedia .....
The so called "official version" of events is well supported by all the evidence but you insist on believing it was an inside job. This is pure confirmation bias. You bring us biased evidence that supports your view. You ignore the mountains of data contradicting that biased evidence.
