lets look at the 10 internet forum debunker comandments they vow to inforce over the internet 1. ok... (leaving out hundreds of government connections) 2. ok... odd phonecalls... but......ok 3. ok... jews are arab...patsies were arab most likely muslim...ok.. 4. ok... no evidence of a shoot down? 5 really?? they had POSITIVE ID the whole time? 6. no witnesses saw fighter jet? debris field? changing crater size? no plane? 7. ok...what about it? 8. ok what about it? 9. patsies 10 lol weak ....... yes..this weak pathetic list is all the "debunkers" offer as proof.
Such a typical truther post. Nothing but outright lies and lameassed conclusions. None of what was posted is a "commandment" or even a command. Failure on your part. The list of evidence is nowhere NEAR the sum total of all evidence. I am sure you would LOVE it if that is all there was. A shame truthers have to lie their asses off about how much evidence there is. The funny thing is these ten things are STILL ten more pieces of evidence than what truthers can bring to the table. Not one piece of real evidence that truther theories are true and they whine about our supposed "lack of evidence"? That is too ironic for words! You should have stayed in bed, OC.
It's funny when skeptics spam that "10 points" list when we ask for evidence the plane buried because no where on there does it list evidence that the plane buried that the FBI claims.
Well, if that list is so weak, please refute it. And by the way, the FBI never claimed the plane buried. They stated that "Much of the plane and its contents were found beneath the soft dirt. The impact shot debris into the bordering woods and into a nearby pond." You should know that. It's from the link that you posted. Much as in some. And there are pictures that document that. The fact that you refuse to accept those pictures as evidence does not equal your ability to refute that fact. http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/ten-years-after-the-fbi-since-9-11/response-and-recovery/202ashanksville
Poor suede thinks every post is about him. News flash. The world does not revolve around you and your retarded theories you can't defend.
That was a link I posted, actually, which Suede then claimed, "oh that's my evidence" There seem to be a plethora of reading comprehension issues evident, if that is indeed his source.
How can I refute it when it doesn't list any evidence I ask for?! From that FBI page: Thanks for proving once again that you can't read very well.
You don't need their evidence to refute it. Just like we use our evidence to refute your retarded opinions, you should be able to use evidence to refute our claims. Ah, there goes suede again pretending a title says it all even when it is clearly explained in the text what is meant and even after it has been patiently explained to him. Anyone else need a better example of what we're dealing with here? Everyone but you reads just fine. You read what you want to read and ignore the rest just like you cherry pick everything else. It is no surprise. Honest people have no problem at all dealing with everything that is said.
He posted that link as well here. That's funny you telling me I can't read very well. Since the part you bolded just says "Burried In the Ground" Can you please tell me where on that page does it tell WHAT buried and HOW MUCH of whatever it was buried? All I can seem to find is this . . . Much of the plane and its contents were found beneath the soft dirt. That doesn't seem to mean the same thing as "the plane buried". But then I don't have a BS degree from the Killtown Academy of Logic and Critical Thinking. Are they still offering classes?
the list of 10 commandments says that they never lost radar of flight93... at no time it was not being monitored... debunkers are standing by that?
Awww.... look at the truther trying to pretend he is clever. ATC lost track of flight 93. The radar records examined after the fact show that Flight 93 was tracked from takeoff until crash. In rural areas, the radar is not as good as it is over urban areas and ATC relies almost exclusively on transponders. Computers remove ground clutter from the radar displays to make it easier for the controllers to monitor the real traffic. A plane in a bad area can be mistaken for ground clutter. It is why they have transponders. Nice try trying to pretend we're saying the flight was monitored the entire time. Wait. No, it was a pretty pathetic attempt. Better luck next time.
It's not 10 commandments. It's merely a list of 10 evidence points regarding Flight 93. So far you have refuted 0 of them.
Nowhere in that link does the FBI claim a definitive percentage was buried. Your source shows you to be wrong. Well done, you have shown your source and in doing so have proven your premise false.
