Anti-vaxxers' level of stupidity is now the highest ever

The article seems to be suggesting that this is just one of many such methods and that there is a market for this sort of 'vaccine reversal' nonsense. This wouldn't be the case if everyone getting the vaccine wanted it.

 

Mate - a fool and his money are soon parted

 

Clearly, its foolish to think a vaccine could be reversed. But thats immaterial to my point. People wanting to reverse it indicates they didnt want to get it in the first place. Which means they're being coerced into getting it.

 

We use a combination of Borax, Fels-Naptha, and sodium bicarbonate to remove vaccines (and Ivermectin) from….articles of clothing! Works great, especially on tough to remove vaccines like clostridials.

 

Shrugs

So? Anything that keeps people alive is good

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/08/briefing/covid-death-toll-red-america.html

https://www.news10.com/news/unvaccinated-20-times-more-likely-to-die-from-covid-texas-study/

 

There certainly were for testing. No information that I can find for the final product so that may be where the information comes from. Luciferase was used to track in vivo and in vitro testing. Allele is suing Pfizer and others for using their patented mNeonGreen without permission for testing.

 

Dismissive of several good arguments? I just debunked with scientific facts, all the not-good arguments you've posted over the months, including your deliberate misinformation (remember your picture of a child with chickenpox that you tried to pass for a vaccine reaction? Remember your manipulation of the data in a British study?).
I've never been dismissive of real arguments. I've never hesitated in addressing the thrombocytopenic thrombotic syndromes, the transverse myelitis, the anaphylaxis, and had long discussions in the open with @557 on vaccine efficacy and hurdles that may occur in the future, about side effects in the short and long term, etc. No, when the arguments are good, I address them. The problem is, the arguments you've propose are for the most part, deliberate misinformation. Yes, these I do dismiss, not before debunking them with solid science.

 

Well, many of them are irrational. In any way you look at this (minus misinformation and unwarranted generalizations), the rational decision is to take the vaccine.

 

Why is it rational to take an unlicensed experimental gene therapy not fully tested (still in phase III testing) and never before used on humans that is evidently killing some?

 

Fake Science pays better than science. That's probably why Fake Science is so common.

"Neuroscientist Edward Awh lost four papers in 2015 after David Anderson, one of his graduate students, admitted to falsifying data. In an unusual turn of events, Anderson responded to our request for comment by taking full responsibility for his actions, which he said resulted from an “error in judgment.”
THE SCIENTIST, The Top 10 Retractions of 2015, A look at this year’s most memorable retractions, By Retraction Watch | December 23, 2015.
https://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/44895/title/The-Top-10-Retractions-of-2015/

 

The main difference between vaxxers and anti-vaxxers is that anti-vaxxers have seen info that the vaxxers haven't seen. I can't post very much of it here but you can see it in the conspiracy section.

This one doesn't go into too much detail so I guess I can post it here.

AN "OPEN LETTER" TO THE WHITE HOUSE, CDC AND FDA FROM DR. CRAIG WAX
https://www.bitchute.com/video/RPAjZpRWLlfB/

https://www.bing.com/search?q=AN+"O...-67&sk=&cvid=C5A423B6193E41ABB1422FE6555AE177

 

That is strange. I don't usually see many ants in the winter, they usually come in the spring and early summer. The recipe is super simple. It is 1 cup of icing sugar and 2 tablespoons of Borax. My neighbor likes to add some water until it is syrupy because he says it makes it work quicker but we have always used the dry mix. I think the syrup mix does not last very long because it will solidify after a day or two. It takes a while to work because the principle is the ants bring it back to the nest and all the other ants eat it and it messes with their digestive system and they die. (Someone described it as they blow up because they cannot poop but I am not sure if that is true). You can put the power on a plastic plate or something but if I put it somewhere that get rains I normally take some small rectangular plastic juice bottles drill a row of holes on each side for the ants to get in and leave it out. The bottle keeps the power dry but the holes still allows the ants in.

 

That is the only thing I have ever used it for. Works great.

 

No. The main difference is that antivax activists have a level of unprecedented ignorance!

You can see where you consistently fail to verify a single one of the endless links- a conveyor belt of garbage! Never do you offer any of your own input because you know nothing about a single thing you post about. Every single item of rebuttal is ignored!

Unbelievable irony. He seems to think that a routine lack of detail is needed outside of the crazy conspiracy section! His latest crap link is from a damn osteopath!

 

This looks like a pretty objective discussion.

Are the Opponents of the Covid Injections "Anti-Vaxx Crackpots"?
https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/are-th...ns-anti-vaxx-crackpots/?showcomments#comments

 

I'm guessing you didn't read it! You just do your routine dump of a link then scoot! Show how that paints a picture that antivaxers aren't crackpots.

 

THANKS!!! I'll definitely give it a try, I've found they develop an immunity to most of the stuff in the box stores after a few uses, by mid-summer I'm ready to use napalm!

 

OK. Thanks for being OK about people who have some reasons that for them are valid, to be hesitant about the vaccine (afraid of some side effects, hesitant about rapid development, etc.)

 

Maybe they don't like getting used as free test trials crash test dummies vaccine edition?