Argentina abortion: Senate approves legalisation in historic decision

The girl was already a mother. The only thing an abortion would have done is make her the mother of a dead baby.

 

OF COURSE you can't address posts # 96, 98, and 99 !!!!

They show what Anti-Choicers are all about

 

.


No, one has to have a child before one becomes a mother.....

Wrong again, as usual....an abortion would've protected her little BORN body from the damage of pregnancy ….an abortion would've meant a dead fetus NOT A DEAD BABY, there is no "baby" in abortion.

 

You do realize that these days remote teleconferencing is an option?

Or are you admitting that some women get abortions not because that is what they want, but because they are afraid of someone else hurting them if they don't.

Doesn't sound so much like "Pro-Choice" to me...

 

What does that nonsensical statement even mean?

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
No, one has to have a child before one becomes a mother.....

Exactly what it says...you really don't know what the meaning of the word "mother" is ??!!!!!!!




OF COURSE you can't address posts # 96, 98, and 99 !!!!

 

Oh, drop dead. May I remind you that she is eleven? Have you even ever met a child?

Geez. I sure hope you are trolling now.

 

Not really news that the only times "life" is in tneir concern is when it comes to abortion and assisted suicide.

I am honestly lost for words here. They do not even make exceptions for 11 year old rape victims.

 

You are an absolute idiot.

 

But, Fox. We are both "undead corpses". Let's have a funeral.

 

Tell us again how old that fetus was.

Anyone who supports termination of a 20-24 week old fetus for reasons as trivial as rape, is NOT a moderate. They are an extremist.
(In my opinion)

Especially since we are not even talking about choice of the female involved here, it seems.

Now, if that fetus had some severe medical issue, it MIGHT be a different story.

You automatically assume that since it was a young girl and she was raped, an abortion needs to be done.

But look at the age of fetus here. It was a baby.

I don't mean to trivialize rape, but to say that since it was conceived in rape we have to kill it, is absurd, when one really stops to think about it. An abortion doesn't NEED to be done.

Rape just isn't a good reason to do it, at that gestational age.

 

That seems to go back to your philosophy of Born Supremacy. We've discussed in other threads.

 

FoxHastings said: ↑
Wrong again, as usual....an abortion would've protected her little BORN body from the damage of pregnancy ….an abortion would've meant a dead fetus NOT A DEAD BABY, there is no "baby" in abortion.

So we've discussed it.. (??) So what?


Yes, BORN people have rights and the unborn don't. I noticed you obviously can't refute that or my post

 

OMGAWD, you've really out done yourself...rape is TRIVIAL ?!!! Says one who obviously has never been raped and knows nothing about rape.

Despicable attitude to call it trivial !!

Disgusting..

People who call rape trivial are extremists..

The Very Good reason for an abortion is the RAPE victim is 11 years old.....I know that you think it's trivial to rape an 11 year old but she shouldn't be the one who suffers for it...


Again, it's quite despicable to call rape "trivial"....

 

Can you believe how sick it is to call rape trivial!!! That "other poster" called rape "trivial".....

 

No, I said it was a trivial reason to kill a 20 week gestational age human being in the womb.

And it is trivial, relatively speaking, when it comes to what you're trying to use it to justify.

 

You don't see the irony?
You are saying the girl deserves more consideration because she is younger.

Yet then you say that the fetus is not worthy of more consideration because it is too young.

You seem to be applying a double standard.

 

Let's hope they soon realise the error of limiting it to just 14 weeks. After all, we can't expect grown women to be organised and proactive, bless 'em. Women are pretty stupid, and incapable of sorting out their lives in a timely fashion.

 

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHA!

Great way to NEGATE your obviously RELIGIOUS based position by USING a meaningless RELIGIOUS accusation at the end of it!

 

WRONG!

She was PREGNANT!

She did NOT have any children ergo she could NOT be a mother.

Why do those who HATE women's rights constantly TWIST the meaning of words?

 

She would need a RESTRAINING ORDER but don't let FACTS stop you from making up absurdities.

 

Than you for CONFIRMING that you do NOT understand the MEANING of the term MOTHER.

Sad!

 

No, youth is not the standard here at all. The standard is human life and the fetus is not yet a human.

 

No, you remind how old that girl was.

I have never claimed to be a moderate or wanted it to seem as if I was. I have told you in other threads that I am Pro Abortion and I believe that the pregnant woman's life comes first even at 9 months because even then hers is the only actualised life in the equation.

I see what you are trying to do here, but it is not working. All you are accomplishing is looking like a defender of child rape.

A fetus is a fetus.

Young girl? More like little girl.

No, it was not a baby.

OK. I've had it. You are just a troll.

 

OMGAWD, you've really out done yourself...rape is TRIVIAL ?!!! Says one who obviously has never been raped and knows nothing about rape.

Despicable attitude to call it trivial !!

Sick and twisted to compare the pain and horror of rape of an actual BORN child with the quick painless death of a fetus...

So YOU would rather the 11 year old suffer and/or die from the pregnancy than the fetus ...that is SICK.