Australia will become nuc waste dumping ground for the rest of the world!

I love the fact you are getting more uncomfortable with the policy, it shows how easily you are influenced by others you believe to be your compatriot.

Look, I agree that we should not be even considering anything other than Australias storage here. BUT the only thing being discussed is a satisfactory location for a central repository for Australia's radioactive waste. NOTHING MORE. Once that has been decided there will be discussion on what TYPE of repository will be placed at this point. It is at this stage I gather consideration will be made to expand the repository, or not. Then maybe Cat will have something to complain about, but not until then.

I have been considering your premise of good old MAL, and I will tell you I am far more cynical than you (if you have not guessed). I alluded to so much with the GST comments and his schmoozing. It seems to me that somebody floats something and when public opinion appears to object to whatever is being proposed, out comes good old Mal to schmooze the situation and talk about how ideas are like the wind in the sales, blah, blah, blah. AND YOU DEFENDED IT. You have nothing to stand on with your complaint.

Honestly, as stated, I believe we should address Australia’s waste before even considering anything else. This has been a situation for over 30years, with no government actually doing anything other than junkets and reports. Get it right first, then if they want to talk about importing other nations waste, be honest and discuss it with further policy.

 

That is 110% on the cards, you wait.....
regards

 

Here we go again. Garry, go and talk to primary school children, you might gain a greater sense of superiority, because you ain't going to get it here my friend. Discuss the issue, stop pretending like you know it all. It's beyond rediculous now.

Why build a nuclear waste repository out on someone's backyard at the back of whoop whoop for low to medium radiation. Again, if it can be stored closer to the vicinity, seeing it is just simply hysteria to fear the Sh!t, which would also only require 2 Olympic swimming pools of space, then bloody bury the crap there. The ongoing cost to transport will far outstrip local councils or state government ability to set aside some land within city limits. Minimal transport costs and greater access to maintain and keep an eye on. The stuff they've already stored hasn't caused any issues has it?......if it has it wouldn't be hysteria.

If it don't make sense and you can't make sense of it, then don't try and make sense of it for the sake of it.

 

Nice attempt at deflecting from your hypocritical stance. Obviously you did not read the post and are just out on your usual try and insult as many people as you can because you are so good... Well it is obvious you’re at a loss....

Are you aware of where a considerable amount of this product is stored??? Do you think it is like your garbage that you toss out and forget about until the truck comes to empty your bin??? Obviously you have little idea of the cost of storage, handling and administration of this waste and WHO pays. So leave it lying around the hospitals and research centres so you can feel all comfortable about not moving it. Continue paying all those people whose job it is to secure and monitor the waste so your demands for safety are meet at those sights and continue to draw those costs from the health budgets and so forth. After all, who needs to do anything, the truck will pick it up Friday and you can forget all about it again… LOL

Oh so witty, unfortunately as per normal, your attempts at sounding smart died with your previous post. Now you’re at a loss to discuss the issue so you want to simply throw defamatory comments about in a hope people will think your credible. Not to worry, everybody knows you by now, you leave enough examples around the forum for everybody to see…

 

Wow, sadly incredible. I think I read everybody else's post to the word but one because you know what you are going to get. A rambling mess of extraneousness. Some muvers do ave em! : roll:

 

And he is back... Obviously your handler has taken break and your totally at a loss as to what to say... Nice to see not much changes.

 

I read that link and there was nothing could be construed as "Australia will become the world's dumping ground for nuc waste". It's all in your mind catter.

 

Yeah okay, whatever makes you feel superior.

 

I'm starting to believe it. Thanks for the thread. I was a little slow up on the uptake and the ability to read through the article provided. None of it makes sense and the more commentary I read the more concerned I become.

 

I will give you boy's the heads-up.

Go do some research on Australia's natural geology and geography, and then look in the mirror, and convince yourselves that Australia is NOT going to become the planets nuclear dumping ground.

Pull your heads out of your bums for once, and realise that Australia isn't good for much. Australia has been used as a strip mine to provide the planet with natural resources for decades. Now that the resources are gone, and other countries are moving to different energy sources, what possible purpose can Australia serve now? Its geographical location makes it useless for anything, except to serve as the planets rubbish dump.

Why the hell do you people think EU immigration has almost stopped. No one from EU wants to immigrate to a rubbish dump, besides rats

 

Putting two and two together and coming up with five...I wonder if the blockage of the Kidman property sale by the Fed Government had anything to do with using some of the property (or nearby property) as a nuclear dump...We wouldnt want to do that and upset our chinese friends, now would we..........

 

All I am saying is to anyone with a decent amount of education and a computer - please do a few hours research on Australia's geology and geography, and I think all your questions will be answered.

Pay special attention to Australia's limestone deposits and the quantity.

http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/n...ent-appendix-2--storage-and-disposal-options/

 

Yea we'd make a good dump compared to most other places.... but it wont happen without anyone knowing about it, so all your drama and fear is wasted breath. If it gets put up as a plan then do what everyone else will, vote against it. The biggest problem with your conspiracy is that hardly anyone supports it going ahead, so why the drama? All you've got is some rambling conspiracy with no foundation or supporters, oh except an MP from SA who think's it would be good for his electrorate - but I doubt he has asked his electorate, and it will take a lot more then that for it to happen.

 

Wants it on his property!

 

[video=youtube;x1Zuo2JtTdY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x1Zuo2JtTdY[/video]

 

Who said it won't happen without anyone knowing about it? Australians are so bloody dumb and backward they don't have the intellect or fortitude to protest against anything. The politicians will secretly have these things constructed in designated locations awaiting for the toxic waste to be delivered, and no one will be the wiser, especially dumbarse Australians.

How many Australians protested against nuclear toxic bombs being tested by the Brits in South Australia in the 1960's? How many Australians knew these nuclear bombs were going to be detonated? LOL

The media will be told to "black-out" anything concerning constructions or future developments, or report possible constructions as "conspiracy theories". You just proved my point.

You even stated Australia would make a good dump compared to other places. Australia has the correct geology for storage, and the perfect geography away from other major countries - the perfect place to store nuclear toxic waste for a few thousand years.

I'm not against this, I think its a good thing. Australia is the PERFECT location as a dump for the planets nuclear waste products, and much more.

Australia is a nothing Country, so it may as well serve some useful purpose!!

 

I agree with you yea, half the posters on this thread couldnt work out the linked article in the OP was about our own waste and not foreign waste LOL, oh dear, so they invented a conspiracy.

I disagree with the rest of your post though, the importance of a genuine free media and realistically maximized freedom of speech means something like a nuclear waste dump for foreign countries simply could not go unnoticed at any significant level.... without getting all Capricorn 1 and tinfoiled hat


Oh, and calling a conspiracy theory a conspiracy theory does not prove your point. I'd have to call something which wasn't a conspiracy theory a conspiracy theory...

 

I agree too. It takes a special quality to be able to analyse, synthesise and deduce complex workings. It's so black and white for half our posters. Oops, I did it again but just wanted to throw my weight behind ya. Anyways, I'll let you get back to building that sand castle but gotta warn ya the tides coming in.

 

That doesn't make sense. It shows poor comprehension and poor understanding of English. I had assumed you were an adult but now I am not so sure.

 

it only shows what you are made of - or better not made of - or is that too high to understand?
Regards

 

Oh we are not arguing the capacity for generating ideas, we are arguing their foundation and validity. If the source of an idea cannot comprehend a piece of trash reporting from a lefty mainstream outlet then it's not a good sign for their theory, and especially when the learning of that itself was the foundation of creating the conspiracy theory to begin with. How many ways are their to skin a cat, because those on the left just seem to enjoy the skinning rather then caring about the actual skin. I know the left just like to argue about stuff and attack the right, but the conspiracy theory just has no valid foundation.

 

Thought you would have trouble taking that all in!

 

Again in an attempt to sound intelligent. Obviously the poster has just purchased a new dictionary. Shame, they really should have purchased a thesaurus.

 

Who are those on the right? Those that love skinning cats or those that would rather enjoy the cat alive.....with its skin in tact that is! Oh, your trying to make an analogy, now I got it. Actually, I think there are those that love killing cats and those that don't love killing cats. Those that don't love killing cats would look at alternate measures for how we can deal with the cat issue, while others would rather kill the cats (and skin em) because it's too much work to think about the measures required to deal with the cat issue.......the cat issue can be whatever you want to make it by the way!

 

I think they're struggling to understand some of those words. You learn these words in kindergarten....just about anyway!