Boycott and Divestment from Israel. Part 2.

So you are saying I am racist against the Jewish people?

What lie am I repeating? I can back up everything I say, I am sure you can not. You have a habit of accusing members of doing the very thing you do. ie not providing sources for your fantastic, disnegenious claims.

Again you should post sources for those claims about what you are accusing! When I will post links to show that my claims are accurate, but you must do the same, your word is no better than mine, and I am claiming you have your history incredibly wrong. (I am happy you backed up while retracting, (as you should) your claims that I hated etc,

I will say that I should of said that the attack of Israel on Egypt was not unprovoked instead of incorrectly saying that Israel was attacked first (in a full scale war). I see no difference between a preemptive strike and a first attack if your countries national security is at risk. Nevertheless your claims of racism are so far off as to be an insult. Its like a redneck calling everything he hates communist. Even if my claim was based on fiction (it wasn't because Israel WAS attacked by Egyptian terrorists ie; "While Nasser (the president of Egypt) continued to make speeches threatening war, Arab terrorist attacks grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched

Don't forget that Syria attacked an Israeli kibbutzim from the Golan Heights (then in other hands) which provoked a retaliatory strike on April 7, 1967.

Hey try one of these (proof);

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six-Day_War

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/myths/mf6.html

ra

 

Semites are not just Jews.

You keep on claiming that the hated Semites attacked even though they didn't.

The reasons for the attack may be debated, but the fact remains that it was Israel which attacked in 1967 and this is recognized globally by all historians including Israeli Zionists.

 

Well done, the Danes. The neoZionists treat Palestinians like animals for slaughter at the ' checkpoints '. You will be shocked to see film of these brutes in action. The Warsaw ghetto over again.

 

Not that support or opposition from the likes of the crawler, David Cameron, is important in the grand scheme of things- but every little helps. Anybody distancing themselves from the racist JNF should be encouraged.
Particularly jewish Israelis;

 

Link please. I see no evidence that moon beats or tortures anyone or supports the Syrian government, nor is moon the thread topic. Personal attacks and insults also do not prove that Israel is always innocent. I'd say that it's rather more the contrary since practices of fascism tend to demonstrate guilt.

 

The bite hardens. The boycotts have their own Wiki page;

 

Are you aware of the fact that boycotts of states are not permitted in certain European jurisdictions. Section 4a of the Aussenwirtschaftsverordnung (AWVO)("German Foreign Trade and Payments Act") does not allow a resident to declare his participation in a boycott against another state (boycott declaration). The risk of criminal prosecution and fines can otherwise ensue.

 

Yes, I'm aware of that and it's a law which requires rescinding as fascist at the earliest opportunities. It's the sort of dumbass rule which makes EU legislation appear stupid, particularly German and French Zionism arselickers. Changes of regime will see changes in that area.

 

What regime change do you foresee that will bring about that change?

I foresee none.

BTW there is an EU blocking regulation which says the same. It is not just France and Germany.

 

The days of Sarkosy and Merkel are drawing to a close. There will be a reaction to what they have done.

Show us this ' EU-wide ' regulation so that we may examine how it relates to non-European fascist States, please.

 

Well Merkel is relatively new to the scene. What change would you foresee in relation to boycotting rules if another constellation took over such as SPD again?

I foresee no change here.

A change in our context will have no bearing at all on boycott rules.

 

Show us this ' EU-wide ' regulation so that we may examine how it relates to non-European fascist States, please.
__________________

 

I can't "show" it to you but you can google it and read up about it. It is known as the Council Regulation 2271/96. The intention was to make the EU independent of the extra-terratorial application of boycott directives of other countries such as the US, in relation to certain countries such as Cuba.

 

It seems that this regulation applies within the EU to prevent EU states from boycotting each other. It has naff-all to do with extra-EU countries to which all EU states can apply boycotts and sanctions if they so wish. In fact, EU countries are positively encouraged to boycott states which appear on the US of AIPAC naughty list. You've served up a bit of red herring. Boycotting Israel is praiseworthy and legal almost everywhere.

 

Be incontrovertibly clear about this; this is a member of the Israeli parliament calling upon the free world to boycott the unscrupulous practices of Israeli businesses operating from the Occupied Palestinian Territories and those Israeli companies which have dealings with them. Ahmed Tibi is a Knesset MK and he does not stand alone among Israeli politicians who despise Zionism for what it is- a political doctrine of ethnic cleansing. Boycott it.

 

And arab member you 'forgot' to mention. An arab Israeli MK, elected by the 5th column in Israel to represent the interests and views of the above mentioned 5th column in Israel.

Besides the obvious fact that he is anti-Israel, I wonder how the existence of an arab MK representing the interests of Israeli Arabs fit into your absurd "apartheid state" propaganda?

 

Ah, so you invoke a racist agenda in differentiating between one Israeli and another ? That's exactly the point the boycott addresses and you are. clearly, engaged in fanning those differences.

 

LOL, whatever you want to call it buddy. As always the liberal way to acknowledge that he has lost an argument is to accuse the opponent of racism. Seriously dude, you should come up with something new and more original, this is not working (if it ever did)

Anyway I am just pointing out that this particular arab israeli MK does not have Israel's best interests at heart, he is openly advocating views that lead to the elimination of Israel. If anything, it speaks volumes of Israel's 5th column that elected and supports him.

 

I'm calling it racism and you've declared your position, albeit unwittingly.

 

The Zionists' program of ethnic cleansing continues, whether the Palestinians resist or not. While much is made in the Western headlines of resistance against Zionist aggression and brutalities nothing is made of the aggression and brutalities themselves. Full details of these latest murders , thefts, imprisonments and State-sponsored terrorism are available here;
http://tinyurl.com/3sbqrx4
These are the recommendations of the Human Rights Centre, but individuals can take a variety of actions themselves, including boycott and divestment from Israel and any companies associated with Israel.

 

Excellent work moon...Thanks for bringing this vital information to the attention of this board..It is not going un-noticed and I for one appreciate your time and effort.

 

Cheers, zulu. The boycott movement is gaining strength;

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_boycott

 

An attempt to ' import Israeli oppression into America ' ;

Anybody in the US should be free to boycott whomsoever they godddam please.

 

We should all boycott the London Philharmonic until it does.

 

Geez, even people I ain't ever heard of are boycotting Zionism.