BREAKING: “Tens of thousands” of fraudulent Clinton votes found in Ohio warehouse

its just a photo, it doesnt discredit the fact that robert byrd was a kkk recruiter.

 

Original photograph:



Christian Times photoshopped photo:



And for those who are really obtuse, a contrast enhanced version of the Christian Times photo:



But there will still be those who believe the Christian Times is a true photo and its story based on "unnamed sources" is Christ's honest truth.

Propaganda is powerful stuff.

 

It's a fake photoshopped image designed to falsely portray Byrd as a major Klan member late in his life.

Byrd renounced the Klan, racism and bigotry in the 1940s.

 

it doesnt change the fact that he was a kkk member. the logic snopes is attempting to use is false. the photo doesnt discredit the story. sorry

 

No, but no one denies that.

It does change the fact that he was NOT a KKK member later in his life, which proof of the fake photo discredits.

 

no one made that claim.

 

That is exactly why the RW propaganda machine created that fake photo, and put it right next to a picture of Clinton kissing a similarly aged Byrd right next to it. To create the false impression that Clinton is a "racist" (just like Donald) and kissing a KKK member.

That fake photo and claim have been posted in this forum numerous times to show just that.

 

no one claimed robert byrd was a kkk member late in his life.

 

That is what the fake picture falsely claims.

 

Just a few images and websites using the fake image to create the false impression Clinton cozied up to Byrd while he was a KKK member.



http://www.jookos.com/2016/08/26/kk...party-kkk-anonymously-donated-20000-campaign/

http://blackrepublican.blogspot.com/2016/09/hillary-clinton-calls-kkk-grand-dragon.html

 

More:











Kind of a case study in how RW propaganda works.

 

Wow! More boxes say "Ballot Box" on the doctored photos.

Well that changes everything, doesn't it!

 

Your acknowledgement that the Christian Times photos were doctored is a step in the right direction.

 

This doesn't disprove the fact that he was a klan member.

- - - Updated - - -

No one claimed she "cozied up to him while he was a klan member" You see what you want to see.

 

And your obstinate denial is a step backwards. Please explain how printing "ballot box" on all the boxes, instead of on the few, props up the absurd claim that this photo supports the transparent denials of Snopes, and other servile leftist apologists.

Even if you only counted the marked ballot boxes in the original photo you are still unable to explain how these uncast votes were just sitting in a warehouse in Columbus Ohio. It seems you'd rather ignore that, however. Typical.

 

So what?

"Hillary kissing KKK leader Robert Byrd" is close enough to me. But if you feel my statement was inaccurate, you can replace it with "Hillary kissing KKK leader Robert Byrd"

- - - Updated - - -

The Christian Times want to create this false RW propaganda story, and nothing like a nice picture to show the proof to the gullible. They found a nice picture, but it was from England in 2005. So they doctored it up thinking the gullible wouldn't notice.

There are no uncast votes sitting in a warehouse. It's a phony story, just like the fake photograph they used as proof.

You've been duped and conned again.

 

Was he not a kkk leader? You don't have to add the word former. Anyways, the picture being doctored doesn't disprove the story. Good luck on planet potato.

 

Wow, hard to unpack everything there without missing all of the glaring errors, but that isn't even close to being an accurate analogy. If someone used that picture (as they did) to say that Byrd had remained a KKK member well into his old age, then yes, pointing out that the image was photoshopped would have discredited that nonsense . . . in fact, that's exactly what happened. If that were the only evidence that he had ever been in the KKK, then yes, maybe your analogy would be accurate. In fact, of course, it isn't. We have multiple independent sources including Byrd his (*)(*)(*)(*)ing self . . . how the hell did you miss that?????? who can attest to Byrd being involved in the KKK. The same can't be said for this article.

What we have is literally a single source, using photos as their primary evidence. They lied about who was in the photos. They lied about when the photos were taken. They lied about what was in the photos. And they lied about what was being portrayed in the photos. The source itself is a fake news site. There is literally no reason to give their claims any credence.

In order for the analogy to be accurate, we'd have to have a story, without any independent verification, claiming that Byrd was in the KKK and using a clearly faked image as their only evidence. In that situation, yes, pointing out that the image is fake and pointing out idiocy of the source would be sufficient evidence for dismissing the claim, as it is in this case.

Are you really going to keep pretending that the story should be treated with any credibility at all? Seriously?

 

Snopes hasn't documented that claim and neither have you. So it remains a bit of unproven rhetoric.

The DNC would never stoop so low...right?

 

no one said he remained a kkk member.

 

Lol, riiiiiight, because the photoshopped image was meant to convey . . . literally anything else. On the other hand, literally no one said that he wasn't a KKK member back in the '40s. He's spoken about it, quite transparently, on numerous occasions. So what's the point of those images again? Care to address any of the observation show what's wrong with your analogy?

 

Not when Hillary kissed he wasn't.

LOL - you were the one who posted that RW propaganda lie.

 

Doesn't disprove the fact that he was once a kkkmember

 

Link the story that said Robert Byrd was still a member and used that picture as evidence.

 

so what?

- - - Updated - - -

See above.