BREAKING: Judge Cannon DENIES Trump's motion to dismiss the classified documents case in Florida

BREAKING: Judge Cannon DENIES Trump's motion to dismiss the classified documents case in Florida based on unconstitutional vagueness.

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco

Awww, so sad...quick, lock up the ketchup...again!

 

It was predictable, but with her, you never know what to expect.

I think her credibility as a judge comes well before any loyalty to Trump.

And she's about to preside over the most devastating trial in US history....

Trump can't escape.

 

I don't doubt it, but the link is beyond broken(what, CNN wasn't fast enough for the 'breaking news'?). And water is wet.

There's no unconstitutional vagueness about this case. The provisions he's charged with breaking are obvious and what the defense has to show is obvious: That he either somehow didn't break them or that he can legally retain possession.

Short of that, there's no real defense to the charges. It's only 'breaking news' in light of the slander Her Honor has received in this case.

 

To do anything different would likely get her removed from the case. This way she can delay, delay, delay and still look like she's a real judge while punting. Either way, I'd be shocked if Trump gets tried in front of a jury in her court this year. Pretty sure if Joe wins, and I think he will, Joe will pardon him after the trials. The 2024 election must also not go to SCOTUS or the House so, get out vote and take a citizen non voter to the polls. Vote and welcome those true Republicans to vote for Joe until the R Party is rid of the authoritarian nut. Do it for the children to remain free, **** the Trump diehard boomers....

 

Pretty much every single motion on Trump's part is legal spit-balling. It's obvious he doesn't want to face the music.

 

The fact that he defied the subpoena and made to attempt to challenge it in court shows he knew he would lose.

 

Sorry, try again...

https://t.co/6FUVfbNJRO

 

She pretty much had to, otherwise she would have been booted from the case and that would have been out of the pan into the fire for tRaitor tRump.

 

The order is a fair and reasonable one(contrary to how people have portrayed Cannon's court, she is being fair and even handed before both the defense and prosecution. If we had more courts like this, we wouldn't have a 97% conviction rate, but we'd have a 100% conviction that we got the right crook. Because the defense is given every avenue)

She didn't outright deny the claims, just that the claims while warranting consideration should be deliberated at trial/jury instructions. This is fair to both sides. I admire her fairness against the public's desire for a lynching of this criminal defendant.

 

The other side of that ‘fairness’ coin is that Cannon gave the ruling without prejudice, which means that The Stain may revisit that claim after the trial has commenced, when it can no longer be appealed…

 

Likely because in her/the court's view, the government has already given its appeal which it will likely consider in a future ruling if defendant Trump tries to revisit it that way.

 

Trump needs to hurry up a lose so the press can find some other thing to write about.

 

lol…her “honor” knows that if she tries to throw the trial any more trump’s way, she would be removed as judge for blatant corruption.
There is no honor in having her head permanently stuck up trump’s ass.

 

She hasn’t taken any action which could be appealed! That’s the point. If she had upheld The Stain’s request to throw the case out NOW, Smith could appeal it to the 11th Circuit. However, once the jury has been empaneled, the trial is underway and cannot be then appealed if she tosses it…due to the ‘double jeopardy’ rules.

 

That's not how double jeopardy works:

https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/double_jeopardy

Double jeopardy would only apply if after tossing it, there isn't an appeal. Or put it another way, the decision to appeal is separate from the trial proper(IE: It's a judge's ruling.). If the prosecution feels as though the case shouldn't be tossed, it can always appeal to a higher court.

I know the 'Cannon conspiracy theory' has captured the hearts and minds of the Left(thank you MSNBC and others for being a bastion of journalistic integrity! /sarcasm), but in reality there is nothing wrong with Cannon's court.

It's just that fair and even rulings for both sides actually means this DOJ has to try to get the conviction, and they obviously hate effort.
(The contempt for effort is also contempt to we the people, not just Defendant Trump.)

If the DOJ has a court in its back pocket, that's 50 times worse than the allegation of the defendant having the same.

 

Oh so does this now mean she's not a Maga sycophant like you folks have been claiming?

 

Oh, so does this now mean that maga’s hysterical attacks on our justice system for prosecuting trump’s crimes are an obvious sham?

 

Exactly. Punted...

 

No it means she's covering her ass. If she had dismissed the charges she probably would have been dismissed from the case. Which wouldn't have been good for tRaitor tRump.

 

lol and how do you expect she would be removed from the case?

 

In the last 18 months, two of his decisions have been overturned on appeal.

That's a lot.

 

It's been talked about before, for lesser sycofancey.

 

for now.... DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. words have meanings..
It ain't over...

Trump can revisit this case after the court determines( which it has not yet) what the “unauthorized possession,” “relating to the national defense,” and “entitled to receive” is to actually mean.
""the Court elects to deny the Motion without prejudice, to be raised as appropriate in connection with jury-instruction briefing and/or other appropriate motions. ""

https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.402.0.pdf

 

Biden gets a pass because "he can't remember", but lets charge Trump with everything. And people don't see a problem with that. Total ignorance!

 

Exactly true. To believe President Biden gets a pass "because he can't remember" and tRaitor tRump got charged because "they're out to get him" is embracing total ignorance. It's been explained many time that neither of them are getting charged for having the "documents". President Biden isn't getting charged because he cooperated fully. TRaitor tRump IS getting charged because he kept them from NARA even after the were asked for MANY, MANY ... MANY times.