Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

BREAKING Lorreta Lynch under investigation!

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by PinkFloyd, May 3, 2017.

Page 2 of 15
  1. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still have yet to see a link regarding this story...
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #26
  2. Jestsayin

    Jestsayin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2016
    Messages:
    16,798
    Likes Received:
    17,571
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Kinda reminiscent of the "Russian ties" BS isn't it?
     
    Jestsayin, May 3, 2017
    #27
    daddyofall and ArmySoldier like this.
  3. PinkFloyd

    PinkFloyd Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
    PinkFloyd, May 3, 2017
    #28
  4. Steve N

    Steve N Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2015
    Messages:
    71,532
    Likes Received:
    91,489
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I was thinking the same thing.

    And your link is dead.
     
    Steve N, May 3, 2017
    #29
  5. Plus Ultra

    Plus Ultra Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This revelation about Lynch is significant. Without seeing the evidence and knowing the parties and more context it is hard to tell exactly how significant, but just from what Comey testified it does sound like there is evidence of wrongdoing.

    Many have long felt there was collusion, that meeting on the tarmac and a multitude of incidents along the campaign suggested Lynch wasn't at all impartial on Hillary's campaign, she seemed to be protecting Hillary, raising obstacles to the email investigation and accepting implausible denials.

    Time will tell what this suspicious email reveals, if it actually shows Lynch prevented an honest evaluation of Hillary's wrongdoing this would be quite bad for the whole Democrat establishment.
     
    Plus Ultra, May 3, 2017
    #30
    SeaFury and PinkFloyd like this.
  6. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Surprise, surprise! Loretta Lynch was making sure the FBI didn't go and investigate Hillary too closely?
    You don't have to be Colombo to see that coming.

    Gee...I wonder why Hillary needed Lynch to be her bodyguard? Why would she possibly need protection?
    Hmmm....:blankstare:
     
    Your Best Friend, May 3, 2017
    #31
    SeaFury and Steve N like this.
  7. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,677
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FAKE NEWS with no article
     
    Ronstar, May 3, 2017
    #32
  8. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So...you find the actual confirmation (as opposed to someone with a significant bias reading the tea leaves) that Trump and his associates are under investigation by the FBI to be really significant because it does sound like there is evidence of wrongdoing, correct?
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #33
  9. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    STILL waiting on a link...
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #34
  10. Plus Ultra

    Plus Ultra Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Maybe they need evidence anyone took any action as a consequence of this email and would prefer those who may have not know what the FBI may have (dates, instructions, recipients, answers...).

    If someone at the FBI confirmed to Lynch they'd prevent whatever investigation from proceeding, better that whoever it was doesn't go erase that confirmation or evidence of whatever steps he took.
     
    Plus Ultra, May 3, 2017
    #35
  11. Texas Republican

    Texas Republican Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2015
    Messages:
    28,121
    Likes Received:
    19,405
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not a smidge of corruption.
     
    Texas Republican, May 3, 2017
    #36
    AmericanNationalist likes this.
  12. mudman

    mudman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2013
    Messages:
    5,358
    Likes Received:
    4,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Yep, your side of the aisle is squeaky clean, not an ounce of corruption.

    Kick ass planet you live on
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
    mudman, May 3, 2017
    #37
  13. Plus Ultra

    Plus Ultra Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2017
    Messages:
    3,028
    Likes Received:
    1,190
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, this Lynch investigation seems a bit different, the Trump investigation is supported by inference, inuendo, suggestion and implication, with Lynch we've got all of that, plus this apparent 'smoking gun'.

    If Comey said he found an email from Flynn, Manafort, Sessions or someone close to the President offering Putín, Lavrov or their ambassador, assurances sanctions would be lifted or any other consideration in exchange for disclosure about Hillary's wrongdoing, then I think I'd have the same feeling I now have about this Lynch investigation.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
    Plus Ultra, May 3, 2017
    #38
    IMMensaMind and SeaFury like this.
  14. PinkFloyd

    PinkFloyd Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2017
    Messages:
    2,386
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It also might be wrapped up in the investigation regarding Russian meddling in the election or Obama wiretapping Trump.

    Today, Comey confirmed no evidence in Trump collusion with Russians. So that issue is dead.

    I want to hear more on Lynch though and see where this leads. It should lead to an indictment for protecting a woman who broke Federal laws.
     
    PinkFloyd, May 3, 2017
    #39
    SeaFury likes this.
  15. In The Dark

    In The Dark Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2014
    Messages:
    3,374
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd love to see the list of black Obama cabinet personnel that aren't corrupt.
     
    In The Dark, May 3, 2017
    #40
    SeaFury and ArmySoldier like this.
  16. ArmySoldier

    ArmySoldier Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2014
    Messages:
    32,222
    Likes Received:
    12,253
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I too would love to see that.
     
    ArmySoldier, May 3, 2017
    #41
    ButterBalls likes this.
  17. Crownline

    Crownline Banned at Members Request

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2016
    Messages:
    6,472
    Likes Received:
    6,538
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Benghazi is a laughing matter?
     
    Crownline, May 3, 2017
    #42
    ButterBalls and SeaFury like this.
  18. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don't even have confirmation of an investigation!
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #43
    Sallyally likes this.
  19. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, how could it possibly be illegal for an Obama operative to use the massive NSA to spy on his political rival?
    Why that presumes Obama is not above the law. It's absurd!
     
    Your Best Friend, May 3, 2017
    #44
    ButterBalls, SeaFury, AmericanNationalist and 1 other person like this.
  20. Esperance

    Esperance Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2017
    Messages:
    5,151
    Likes Received:
    4,379
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Her lies about Benghazi have already been proven through the release of her e-mails to Chelsea under a freedom of information act request.

    And now Comey has indicated that Weiner received over 6000 classified e-mails that were supposed to have gone to his wife.

    Once again, the law states that being careless makes you just as guilty as if you were intentionally breaking protocols.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2017
    Esperance, May 3, 2017
    #45
    SeaFury likes this.
  21. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I challenge you to prove that claim...AND to provide a link which supports the title from your thread (a required rule of this forum).
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #46
    Sallyally likes this.
  22. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Trump doesn't stand by this accusation anymore. Why do you?
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #47
  23. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rational people saw this one coming. Even with Susan Rice digging in the dirt nothing has come of it.....shocked face!

    Hopefully many more shoes will drop leading back to Ma Barker Clinton herself!
     
    Your Best Friend, May 3, 2017
    #48
    SeaFury likes this.
  24. MrTLegal

    MrTLegal Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 25, 2017
    Messages:
    41,095
    Likes Received:
    26,663
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The bolded statement is fundamentally inaccurate. The requisite mens rea for this law is not negligence.
     
    MrTLegal, May 3, 2017
    #49
    mdrobster likes this.
  25. raytri

    raytri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    38,841
    Likes Received:
    2,142
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Um ... yeah. He's referring to this story:
    https://www.nytimes.com/2017/04/22/us/politics/james-comey-election.html?_r=0

    Here are the relevant paragraphs:

    That is VERY thin gruel indeed.
     
    raytri, May 3, 2017
    #50
    mdrobster likes this.
Page 2 of 15

Share This Page