BREAKING: Trump Goes Scorched Earth In Response To Bombshell J6 Footage Released By Tucker Carlson

It’s a perfectly legitimate comparison. It’s a done issue. There was no insurrection and every time you all bring up the few actual bad actors that day we will simply throw the spring and summer 2020 leftist insurrection back in your face. When you all commemorate J6 in solemn pretense, we will simply laugh at your side and openly mock their hypocrisy.

 

How does one make the leap from someone saying eradicate and ideology to reiterating it as eradicating people?

 

He had to because the government and the prosecution withheld exculpatory evidence from him and his defense attorneys.

 

He had to plead guilty? No, it does not work like that.

 

Offhand, from memory, bear spray, clubs and fists come to mind.

Oh, and a fire extinguisher.

 

I never thought I would live to see political prisoners in the U.S. I guess I have lived too long.

 

I'm waiting for the part of the video where he uses his super shaman powers to overthrow the government

 

Ideology ≠ people — at least that’s what the right wing keeps telling me.

Whats good for the goose

 

How dare Tucker Carlson completely ruin the narrative we've created about January 6th / leftist

Chuckie Schumer is freaking out that video not approved by his party is out there now. lol

 

Our corrupt bipartisan ruling political class is demonstrating that it does not want peace.
Their opponents should resist any temptation to give them what they clearly want.

 

His super shaman powers did make the armed Capital Police escort him around the building. I guess they weren't powerful enough to open the locked door though.
He should have blinded them with a laser or hit them in the head with frozen water bottles. Those people get off with only spending 3 days in jail.

 

FYI: The American criminal justice system now relies on forced confessions.

“THOUGHT EXPERIMENT

With coercive plea bargaining, prosecutors have ripped that heart right out of the criminal justice system.Joan Wong for NBC News / Getty Images

America is the most prosperous country in the history of the world. We excel at innovation and mass production — and nowhere is that more true today than our criminal justice system, which features a streamlined process for transforming millions of suspects into convicted criminals quickly, efficiently and without the hassle of a constitutionally prescribed jury trial.

It’s called coercive plea bargaining, and it’s the secret sauce that helps us maintain the world’s highest incarceration rate.”

“Of coercive plea bargaining’s many problems, two are particularly concerning.

The first is false convictions. Though it was once believed that a confession in open court — a guilty plea — was proof-positive of a person’s guilt, we now know that simply isn’t true. Indeed, of the more than 300 people definitively exonerated by the Innocence Project using DNA evidence, some 11 percent pleaded guilty to crimes they did not commit since 1989. The National Registry of Exonerations puts the total number at 20 percent since 1989. But whatever the precise figure, it is clear that innocent people are routinely coerced into pleading guilty to crimes they did not commit.”
NBC NEWS, Prisons are packed because prosecutors are coercing plea deals. And, yes, it's totally legal., By Clark Neily, Aug. 8, 2019. (Emphasis mine)
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opini...utors-are-coercing-plea-deals-yes-ncna1034201

 

Great story. The shaman also admitted guilt.

 

What is fascinating about the reds that have decided to FINALLY watch any video footage from 1/6 is that all of these videos have been available and have been linked to youtube for the past 2 years. Reds ignored them because they despised the truthful narrative that the dipshit traitors trump invited to DC that day did this.

Now Tucker comes out and shows THE EXACT SAME VIDEOS with his own twisted horseshit conspiracy theory narrative and now the reds thing they have a smoking gun of some sorts. LMAO

I swear, Fox News knows EXACTLY their target audience. LMAO

 

The only thing Tucker Carlson was ever able of destroying was his own integrity.

 

you think finding a clam in the storm proves there was no storm?

 

So, applying Vyshinsky's rules of evidence -- ‘confession of the accused is the queen of evidence’-- case closed?

“In Poulantzas’s case, from the beginning he uses it to emphasise the autonomy of superstructure – and the law in particular – from the economic ‘base’. The early work can be read, then, in light of his later escape from and rejection of the metaphor, and I will trace this thread through his work as I progress.

In the 1964 essay he leaves the terms undefined, working instead by criticising earlier Marxian accounts of law, and thereby building a negative picture of his own view from which we are left to infer the meaning of his concepts. He begins with Reisner and Vyshinsky (the latter best known as Prosecutor General during Stalin’s purges of the late 1930s and his related jurisprudential principle that ***‘confession of the accused is the queen of evidence’***). He agrees with their definition of the law as a “conceptual ensemble of behavioural norms and rules” – that is, it expresses ‘what should be’ socially to reinforce the practices that reproduce the base (alongside other superstructural domains such as morality, religion, the state and “even art (albeit in a different sense)” [p. 26]). But he charges them with reading the ‘what should be’ directly from the interests of the capitalist class. Their picture of capitalist law is (at least in Poulantzas’s telling) an uncomplicated instrument by which capital maintains its domination.
SCANDALUM MAGNATUM, "FROM HENCEFORTH NONE BE SO HARDY TO TELL OR PUBLISH ANY FALSE NEWS OR TALES, WHEREBY DISCORD, OR OCCASION OF DISCORD OR SLANDER MAY GROW BETWEEN THE KING AND HIS PEOPLE, OR THE GREAT MEN OF THE REALM.”, Not, in fact, where we might choose to begin, The Poulantzas project 1, By Nicos Poulantzas in his final book, 1978. (*** emphasis mine)
https://scandalum.wordpress.com/2010/10/10/not-in-fact-where-we-might-choose-to-begin/

 

The shaman confessed to something? Odd. I thought it was an allocution when you plead.

 

The judge in his trial was Royce Lamberth:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royce_Lamberth

Nominated to the District Court of DC by Ronald Reagan.

Are you saying that this judge oversaw a wrongful, politicized trial? What's the evidence?

 

Common sense. 4 years in prison for taking a guided tour of the capitol? Think about it. It will come to you.

 

It came to me.

He wasn't on a guided tour, he broke into the capital in an attempt to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.

Do I win anything?

 

So, you are saying your common sense tells you this judge wrongfully convicted Chansley, for what? For being a tourist? Who made the judge abdicate his judicial duty and convict based on politics rather than facts? Why did Chansley plead guilty and later indicated remorse for his actions on 1/6?

 

And Chansley's attorney never brought up the fact that he was being escorted and directed by the capital police. They needed Tucker to show them.

The whole thing is just pathetic.

 

This is what you said you think: "Great story. The shaman also admitted guilt." You

 

Yes. Admission of guilt is part of a a plea agreement.