Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

you think a plane wing can do this to a 10 inch steel pole and not have a scratch?





You arent serious are you?

 

Once again, you need to make your apples and oranges strawman. Why do you do that?...can't really make the honest argument?

"what you are saying is that at that speed a 1 pound bird will go right through the freaking wing and out the other side "

Yes, just like the pumpkin in that video...went through both sides of the boat....the science is the same.

"but a 400 pound pole will be cut in 1/2 and simply just bounce right off."

Lets see....a hollow, breakaway light pole...what, 20 ft tall or so....afixed at the base, with most of it's volume at its base, experiences an impacted high on it's structure...and, you think its the same as your video of a plane impacting a solid telephone pole???

Your problem isn't Science...it's honesty.

 

I dont know about that this whole thing look pretty shady to me

 

well looky what we got here:

a King of Strawmen.

 

Where is your evidence the wing(s) were not damaged? Well????

 

but it had to accelerate a 400 freakin pound pole from zero to the 500 mph or to the point it broke, and now after you threw that lil ole fomulatoroid around now you forgot how to use it or is your purpose to just spout a whole lot of diaper doo doo?

 

not only was it not damaged, it didn't even have a single scratch.

 

and how is that a straw man patriot?

 

diaper doo doo.

this is the maturity level of your debate?

wow.

- - - Updated - - -

ohhh...now we're getting into personal attacks.

 

Just another nonsesical statement. Why do you even bother?...you're in way over your head.

 

if yo uhave a complaint lodge it with the board administrators, I am not the one who set up tha language filters.

 

why do Truthers always resort to strawman arguments and personal attacks, when they are backed into a corner by their lack of evidence?

 

well here you go troughers here is your star physicist who just (*)(*)(*)(*)ed up a physics 101 question!

 

It's what you do when you lack the evidence to back up your BULSH.

 

what straw man argument? Is this like charades and we get to guess wtf you are talking about?

 

and yet they LOVE to whine and (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) about how they are attacked.

- - - Updated - - -

where is your evidence that the wings weren't damaged and didn't even have a scratch after hitting the lightpoles?

that is your strawman.

 

Ya got nothing, huh? Shocker.

So, how did all those broken light poles get there?...Who placed them there?...and why did no one see those people placing them there?

You got some work to do....better get a wiggle on!

 

Hey you are the one who claimed to be a particle physicist and I am still waiting to see your cipherin on how much force a 10" pole weighing 400 pounds exerts against a wing moving 500 miles per hour, you know, considering a 1 pound tweety boyd put a huge hole in one side and went right out the other.

Maybe osama bin laden had secret anti forcity weapons installed you think?

 

I want to see evidence that the wings weren't damaged or even scratched by the lightpoles.

 

only for soemone who knows how to add 1+1 and come up with 2, anyone else no nothing at all.

 

still waiting for that evidence, Koko.

 

I am not going to prove a trougher claim LMAO

 

Where is your evidence the planes wings had no damage???

 

its your claim.

you claimed that the wings had no damage or even a scratch.

support your claim or you have no credibility.

 

I am not going to prove a trougher claim LMAO