Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 25, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Reality is not something you have a good relationship with.
     
  2. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You dishonestly dismiss any claim as "official BS" if it doesn't come from a Nutter.

    Here is one claim.

    There was no evidence of any explosive materical found in the WTC...NONE.

    Agree or Disagree. Support with evidence and proof.
     
  3. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Utterly hilarious. The bolded section you have no desire to seek the truth, all it shows is your aversion to it.
     
  4. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, actually you don't. You have swallowed hook, line and sinker the complete Nutter myth. It's been over a decade and not one Nutter claim has been found to be true....NOT ONE. But yet, you all claim to know the truth.

    How do you do that being wrong all the time?
     
  5. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113


    I havent see you put up any facts, do you have any facts?
     
  6. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    waste of time when since the troughers here have no clue what variants explosive demolitions can be performed under. another illogical DUH
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's a lot easier to disprove outrageous claims made in the "official" BS story, than it is to explain exactly HOW they pulled off every single detail, I'll grant you. The reality you mention? Well, that appears to be very open to speculation. I think the effort made to debunk a bunch of "crazy kooks" says quite a bit towards determining which way the truth detector pendulum swings. "Official" supporters are (*)(*)(*)(*) sure nothing is "official" amiss, and seem to go to an awful lot of trouble to combat a bunch of "kooks". Same players, year after year, and over, and over. Must all just be "good, caring Patriots", to persist with such vigor, wouldn't you say?
     
  8. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can't get through a sentence without hurling insults, can you?

    Disagree...now, I'll play it the "official" way here, and say 'cite your source' for your claim. I'll show you how the shill approach backfires.
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can't prove Mart Poppins didn't exist either but, I'm pretty sure she was part of a "story" (official, of course). Doesn't seem to slow down the continuous attacks on "a bunch of kooks", claiming fictional characters don't exist though, does it? Their story has changed more times than Carter has little liver pills since 2001, but WE'RE the kooks. Cracks me up.
     
  10. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ad hominen is all they got!
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They're pretty good at their jobs though, I gotta admit.
     
  12. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You don't get to do that. Absence of evidence, in some cases, is evidence of absence. You are just going to have to show evidence of explosive charges and none exists.
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Neither does Mary Poppins.


    Everybody else has to "cite their source"....except for supporters of the "official" fairy tale. I know. I'm just highlighting it here.

    On a side note...I'm good with the "absence of evidence" mentality though. Take supposedly buried planes, for example. It goes on and on, friend.
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Aww man...now that hurts. Another insult.

    You know, I often hear (on this forum) how architects, engineers are all whacko, and OCTers are always correct, despite people that say differently, and want to know who these "kooks" are that support outrageous "conspiracy theories". Well, here are some of these "kooks" here:
    http://www.ae911truth.org/en/news-s...-are-these-2000-architects-and-engineers.html

    Now, why is it that all of these folks are "kooks", yet somehow, the anti-Nutters (please excuse borrowing of the phrase from above but, I'm trying to highlight the obvious hypocrisy...thanks) are 100% infallible and 100% correct. How is that....always? How is it that nobody else has any "good points" raised (other than the anti-Nutters)? The Nutter myth? Glad you have something else to call it now.

    Hey, I admire your dedication...really. Takes an extreme amount of loyalty to all things "official" to accomplish what it is that you do. Kudos bro.
     
  15. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Waste of time since Twoofers just like to make up nonsensical claims to cover their BS. Debris was tested and found to not contain any explosive materials. Neils Harrit's work was refuted...no thermite found. Cadaver/Explosive material detecting dogs were brought in and did not "hit" on anything.

    Once again, you Twoofers can't back up your BUSLH.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Wish I could return the compliment...Takes nothing but stupidity, ignorance and simple hand-waving ability to be a Twoofer.

    Come back when you have an argument that makes sense.
     
  16. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Really? WHO tested it, exactly? The same entities that "enhanced" the act? "Twoofer"...that's an insult, or it's supposed to be. Am I right?
     
  17. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is the report, independent report that refutes the claims made by Harrit, Jones et al.

    http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/911..._030112web.pdf

     
  18. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113

    we did this already, his test was (*)(*)(*)(*)ed from the start.

    still waiting for a properly performed test for the energy signature.

    you got it? Do you even understand what you are reading? NO!
     
  19. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Prove it. I bet you can't and you won't because it requires research...something you have absolutely no idea how to do.
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    you want it you search for it, btdt not going there again unless you got something new and you dont.
     
  21. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    yawn...just another claim you can't back up. Why should I have expected anything different.
     
  22. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    troll..........
     
  23. Ronstar

    Ronstar Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2013
    Messages:
    93,464
    Likes Received:
    14,681
    Trophy Points:
    113
    its funny when trolls call other people trolls.

    ;)
     
  24. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it was not. You just don't want to take your fingers out of your ears and stop warbling. When the termite sniffers can show us some free aluminum in their crap, they will look at least as bright as fifth graders on the short yellow bus.

    Yes, when are the termite gang going to give us one on a chip from Jones' stash burned in an inert atmosphere?
     
  25. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,887
    Likes Received:
    1,862
    Trophy Points:
    113
    thermetic material, but then troughers do not understand the difference.

    Ever notice that?
     

Share This Page