Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 25, 2013.
I noticed the claims of thermite being found have been soundly refuted.
LoL what the hell is thermitic material? It's either thermite or it's not, it can't be somewhere in between.
That is by far the dumbest line I have ever heard belched from the truther community.
Thermitic material, what a clownshoe
yeh you will find that term used in the scientific community.
Strange...can't get to your link there. My, that's unexpected.
- - - Updated - - -
List one for us please. I'd like to examine the purveyor of such information. Surely, you can link one for me? Thanks!
I've linked you to the Millette study fifty (*)(*)(*)(*)ing times by now. Explain to me what (*)(*)(*)(*)ing evidence you have against, or shut the (*)(*)(*)(*) up. Drop it. You've lost. You have had your ass handed to you, by using the Millette study, at least 10 times, and in at least 3 current running threads.
Just running like a little (*)(*)(*)(*)(*) from it because you can't contest it isn't doing you any favors. Show some evidence of (*)(*)(*)(*)ing det cord, of ignition switches, of people being able to plant the actual thermite. Even if it was (*)(*)(*)(*)ing paint on it would have had to have been painted extremely recently. There were no reports of a fresh coat of paint being applied to the twins, anywhere. You've been shown at least 5 times that the largest demo in the world took four (*)(*)(*)(*)ing months of prep to get it ready to demo. You've been told a thousand times that there is no way in hell that thermite could live for an hour in extremely hot conditions.
Either face the facts, or stop with the argument. Fang's explanation of your behavior becomes more and more factual every single day.
A pretend IT specialist, and a pretend lawyer. Those two and a dollar will get you a cup of coffee.
My my...such anger towards a "kook" huh? Personally, I could care less what "kooks" have to say. I certainly wouldn't spend any vast amounts of time trying to point out that they're "kooks", or even responding to their "kooky" comments in the first place but, hey, that's just me, and I CERTAINLY wouldn't continue to waste said time, after continually hollering "kooks! kooks!", every ten minutes. But, maybe "official" "kooks" need somebody to ferment over on a continual and daily basis, year after year. I don't know. Who cares what "kooks" have to say though huh? What does it matter and why does it need to be tamped down? Oh, there are many here who apparently "care" that much, what a "kook" or "kooks" have to say. It's just that they care, more than everybody else, I guess...
I find that very strange.
Funny, I find it strange when morons constantly link to 'no planes' sites, then pretend that they aren't 'no planers'.
Hilarious, but strange.
not as hilarious as when you were trying to tell us your a truther.
keep in mind they are suffering incredible pain from the constant daily beatings they have to take from truthers. trougher life isnt that easy now that pm magazine jumped ship on them. LMAO
That's laughable (and sad that you actually think that...Delusion much?). You have yet to provide proof for one of you Nutter claims that can't and has not been refuted by the science. Not one.
Controlled Demolition - No thermite found, no controlled demolition took place. Niesl Harrit/Jones report was soundly refuted as bad science. The Controlled Demolition industry's leading trade mag even goes so far as to say claims of the Nutters are based on ignorance.
No Planes - Complete bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Not only are the video and photo evidence overwhelming, the people on the ground eyewitnessed planes so, any claim that an "orb" or fake plane added to certain video is outside the realm of reality. No to mention, the plane and body parts that rained down from the towers after the crash. Twoofers claims ignore evidence and logic.
Wow, are you and Ben Stiller related? Instead of commenting on any of the facts I presented, or disputing any of the illogical fallacies that you openly engage in, you went off on some ridiculous rant about how people come here to combat you?
Don't tell me, next up is your patented "shills", or maybe you're newly found "We can't have honest debate". Maybe that's because instead of facing the facts you cry like a (*)(*)(*)(*)(*).
well I am waiting for you to comment on facts that I provided
It's the truther dodge. Faced with serious questions and/ or facts, he will insult and run.
But I am still waiting
LMAO. Jumped ship or just given up on having to open all the mail that drooling nutjobs were sending them trying to sell hallucinatory evidence of an inside job? A lot of the media have just decided to cut off any discussion of such asshattery at the first sentence out of a nutbar's mouth. Notice that C-SPAN refuses to take calls about it any more?
Grownups with radio and TV shows and nationally-distributed magazines have other things to do with their time and print space.
You have provided none.
I'll try to address the anger and frustration you apparently partake in (just for fun).
Your "Millette Study" has been debunked some time ago, Sir. I'll link it for you below, and then you can resume your agenda. One point in the debunking link raised, was the fact that Mr. Milette did a pretty good job of "washing" these chips he (supposedly) tested, before he supposedly tested. Effectively, he washed away any thermite that may have been present at the outset. It goes on to state that the "thermite was ON the chips, not IN them". Small difference, wouldn't you say? The link goes on and on, explaining in painstaking detail, the whole debunking of the defective "study", and it even has sourced links, for everything. Have at it and enjoy.
For those too lazy or unwilling to look at the link, here is a humorous (but accurate summation) from it, regarding questions the would be reader should ask themselves about WHO had a hand (at the very least), and was likely a principal player, in this staged, bumbled fiasco, known as 9/11, and proceed to another powerful leader, right here at home. Take the evidence where it leads you, not where you want it to lead. It is the following:
Anyone still trying to figure out who did 9/11, eleven years on, should ask themselves:
Whose father was chief aide and secretary to the leader of a revolutionary movement which went on to perpetrate terrorist acts such as the King David Hotel bombing, which killed 92 people?
Whose father-in-law was a member of the terrorist organization that bombed the King David Hotel in 1946?
Which prime minister proudly participated in a two-day seminar commemorating the 60th anniversary of the King David Hotel bombing?
Who wrote in 1995 that "militant Islam" would bring down the World Trade Center?
For which prime minister was a report written in 1996, entitled A Clean Break, and advocating "removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq"?
Which prime minister said that 9/11 was "very good" and beneficial for his country?
Who is prime minister of a country with a reputation for staging false-flag terror - for example, attacking U.S. interests for political gain as in the Lavon Affair, and whose intelligence agency was described by an elite US Army study center as "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act."?
Which past and present prime minister has an intelligence agency that had a mole in the 1993 WTC bombing and a long-time asset whose cousin was one of the alleged Flight 11 hijackers?
Who is prime minister of a country that attacked the USS Liberty in 1967, killing 34 and wounding more than 170?
Who was in London on the morning of 7/7/05, and had advance knowledge of the bombings that morning which killed 56 people?
Which past and present prime minister has an intelligence agency that admitted to advance knowledge of the London 7/7 bombings, with the London-born head of intelligence as of 9/11/01 also exhibiting an intimate knowledge of the operation by revealing that he knew from day one that the Tube bomb blasts were simultaneous, when the London authorities believed for two days that the first explosion preceded the third by 26 minutes?
Who, like one of the Flight 11 passengers, is ex-Sayeret Matkal, ex-MIT, and lived in Denver and Jerusalem?
Whose brother was killed in a mission at Entebbe, and consequently would be the ideal person to recruit a fellow ex-Sayeret Matkal, MIT alumnus, Denver / Jerusalem resident, who "loved jumping out of planes" and had made and lost a fortune in the dotcom boom and bust, for a mission that could involve jumping out of a plane, after which the Flight 11 passenger would be hailed as an "all-Israeli hero", whether or not his death needed to be faked?
Who is qualified to BSc-level in architecture, was a close friend of the owner and (1987) developer of WTC7 who would have access to blueprints of the WTC buildings, and therefore would be capable of exploiting his expertise and those blueprints in devising controlled demolitions to take down the WTC buildings?
Who was a close friend of the principal new leaseholder of the Twin Towers who took control of the buildings and insured against multiple terror attacks for billions of dollars, six weeks before the buildings were destroyed in multiple terrorist attacks, on a day when the new leaseholder uncharacteristically failed to breakfast at the Windows on the World restaurant because of a "dermatologist's appointment"?
Who lived in the same town as a Popular Mechanics-reading billionaire businessman who met with a New York police chief when he visited Israel from August 26-29, 2001, ostensibly about fighting terrorism and Ecstasy trafficking yet was bizarrely unaccompanied by any narcotics or anti-terrorist experts, following which the businessman provided the police chief with a "loan" for $250,000 by way of a personal check made out to his wife via an intermediary, after the police chief claimed a "hijacker's" passport had been "discovered"?
Hint: It was the same man!
The link itself is: http://www.takeourworldback.com/millettepaintchips.htm
Now, for those that are actually following along versus lazily observing shill talking points....the debunker, has been debunked. The Millette study, was, well, BS (just like the "official" BS story).
As to the angry "official" BS story defender well, your serve, Sir.
Who just engaged in a pack of ad hominems and lies?
Who went through all the information in just 8 MINUTES, and boldly refuses to acknowledge the link has ANY valid points, at all??
I've seen it before,Fraud.......it all boils down to harrits 'thermitic material' chips having CLAY and EPOXY in them.
Just like adding water to gasoline.
The answer to the questions above (according to the anti-semitic site linked) is Benjamin Netanyahu.
What does Benjamin Netanyahu have to do with the Millette Paper, and how does linking to these questions address the Kaolin issue?
so the government is commiting treason and disenfranchising its citizens?
those are (*)(*)(*)(*)ing acts of war.
- - - Updated - - -
energy signature please
Until clown boy shows us a chip burning and producing heat in a vacuum, every rational person with an IQ of 90 or more will think he is playing with paint chips.
its false claims without the energy signature, waiting.
Well you know if you scratch a truther hard enough,a bigot pops out...
Separate names with a comma.