Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

nah its all fine with me if you want to believe in the fairy god mother and light pole mowers. (gasp)





Flt 77 was one bad ass mower!

Now most people would call that delusional but I am not that mean and cruel.

 

no you did not answer the question, I gave you specific criteria to use that would prove or disprove a point, you instead responded with a concoction of frivolous material that is useless to prove anything. sorry

 

Koko just refuses to understand there was nothing special about flight 77 ,it wasn't a 'light pole mower',the poles acted like they were designed to,when sharply hit

 

Really? show your data then.

go ahead see if you got the goods to make my face red LOL

Again not holding my breath it wont be forthcoming

 

Again,koko needs to show where we are wrong..it's no great secret that light poles on highways are designed to shear to ensure crash survivability.

If he has some sort of groundbreaking info,he needs to stop playing with it,and show us.

 

its also no secret that cars do not fly and the "poles" are not designed to shear LOL

ok 3 up 3 down

next!

 

No one said cars 'fly',but the poles would shear if enough force was applied by either a car or plane.....I fail to see why koko can't understand that.

 

but you know full well the pole does not shear when a car hits it because cars do not fly. no one said a pole wont shear with enough force.

nice backpeddling.

 

F=MA

Force=Mass X Acceleration.

If I take a sheet of printer paper and am able to accelerate it to 5000 Miles per hour....that sheet of paper would cut through a steel pole....through a brick wall behind that steel pole....and still be able to chop off the heads of 100 people lined up in a row.

AboveAlpha

 

yeh so?

 

My point is a Jet Liner that weighs Multiple Tons traveling at a High Rate of Velocity can cut through just about anything.

AboveAlpha

 

they're MADE to shear when a car hits them,and a 757 hitting them is no different in relation to applied force....why koko refuses to see this escapes me.....maybe he's just being a troll.

 

Yes...they are designed to shear just as the front of a modern car is designed to absorb impact.

But a 757 flying at 300 plus miles per hour will cut through about anything.

AboveAlpha

 

really? I think you are fibbing.

seems someone is smokin something good, who ever that was that wanted a "serious" discussion I hope they are hanging around to watch you all dance the trougher dance.




Wings completely sheered off!



LMAO

- - - Updated - - -

look friend, you dont drive a 757 down the highway any more than a fly a car.

try getting a grip on reality.

nope as usual you are in over head. lol

 

This aircraft does not seem to be traveling at any velocity greater than 80 to 120 miles per hour.

AboveAlpha

 

<sigh> no one 'drove' a 757 down any highway,but it DID fly over some roadways and there WERE lightpoles on ths sides of the roadway that the 757 intersected,the wings striking them at 500 mph were just the same,albeit with more force,as a car hitting them.

 

so?

It can slice right on through a steel pole but not a bird.




Its a flying tin can LMAO





Stoopid little bird sliced through the wing instead of the wing slicing through a bird.

Yeh I definitely think we need to see your work now how this fantasy of yours takes place. Now if you told me it was going supersonic thats a whole different tune, but birds dont fly supersonic and neither is 300 mph supersonic last time I checked.

The problem you have if it was super sonic the wing would have exploded on contact and we are back to that huge ball of flames we did not see. LMAO youve got problems pal.

so post your data. again not going to hold my breath lol

 

The data is self evident.

Whether or not damage is incurred upon the wings or air frame of the aircraft has nothing to do with the damage of the impacted object.

F=MA....that is the fact.

AboveAlpha

 

I never seen a car hit a pole 50 feet above the ground, got some pictures? Ok so then no 757 hit the box, that I can agree with you about. 500 mph? really? making more (*)(*)(*)(*) up are ya?

 

really? how does that work? Explain it for us.

What data do you think is self evident and how does f=ma apply to this again?

Explain how that will produce the results you claim.



You need to explain why the bird cut through the wing instead of the wing cutting through the bird. we nee fma man!

yeh you really need to fma this for us!

 

If the Shear Strength of a steel pole is 250 Lbs per square inch and I have a 10 Lbs 1 inch by 1 inch by 10 foot length of wood....all I have to do is accelerate that piece of wood to about 350 mph and it will punch a hole right through that steel pole.

If I have a 20 lbs wooden disc and I accelerate it to a high enough velocity regardless that the wood is not as dense or hard as the steel it will chop that steel pole down at impact.

AboveAlpha

 

Haven't you ever seen pictures of a stick that was driven straight through the trunk of an Oak Tree because a Tornado accelerated it to a velocity capable of allowing it to do so?

AboveAlpha

 

yeh so? we are not talking about "IF", coulda shoulda maybe, wood, or straw beer farts and belches.

this is steel pole versus plane wing. little birdies that CUT right through the wings but you think the wing will cut steel! like duh!

you are dancing around in circles

you seem to think the wing wont explode and burst into flames upon contact with a steel pole despite its air speed, flames which are nonexistent on the pentagon tapes, just like the pole mower!

- - - Updated - - -

irrelevant not applicable., lol

 

/no one has said a car hit the 45 FOOT above ground light pole,but the force needed to shear the bolts at the base would have been the same HAD a car hit that far above ground,just like it would been had a plane hit

 

Really?

show us how you came to that conclusion since they are not designed to operate that way. LOL this is getting more comical by the minute.