Building 7 was the most obvious example of the 3 that fell

watch the whole thing, i dont know how you can compare light poles to telephone poles which were there to simulate trees to what happenend at the pentegon.

Watch and read[video=youtube;TrIZd53Gl4E]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TrIZd53Gl4E[/video]

http://http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=AD0624051

I don't know how this relates to 9/11 I don't see it myself but maybe koko can enlighten me

 

So, you do think it's a planes wings hitting trees and telephone poles are the same thing as a plane's wing hitting a hollow galvanized aluminum ligh pole?

Are ignorant or dishonest?

- - - Updated - - -

Come back when you learn how Science is actually done. Until such time, you fail.

 

Hey, guess what, *******...

You've been proved wrong AGAIN!

 

Kookoomojojo,

Explain how the light poles, if not clipped down by a plane, were found in the condition they were in? How did it happen?...Let's see what you really have?

 

now now now, like most troughers, nothing like proving that you do not know the difference between the pole and the base structure that the pole mounts upon.

[video=youtube;WGL8FEMc378]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGL8FEMc378[/video]

- - - Updated - - -

are you kidding? you think you got a case prove it dont ask me to prove YOUR claim FOR YOU! LMAO

 

Eyewitnesses saw the plane clip the light poles. You would have to PROVE they are lying and for what reason. You can't.

Tell us again how tree and telephone poles are similar to hollow light poles? Tell us how your apples to oranges comparison is equal? And then tell us what really happened to those light poles?

I bet you can't.

 

lateral strength

 

Eyewitnesses saw the plane clip the light poles. You would have to PROVE they are lying and for what reason. You can't.

Tell us again how tree and telephone poles are similar to hollow light poles? Tell us how your apples to oranges comparison is equal? And then tell us what really happened to those light poles?

I bet you can't.

 

hopefully koko is just a kid in jr high school and just practicing his keyboard skills..because no way can an adult be that stupid..could they?

 

Are the eyewitnesses lying???

 

Well at least I remember now where I saw the quote.....

 

No. The base broke free and the pole went flipping end-over-end and broke. Anybody but an idiot can see that the base sheared exactly as designed.

Sometimes the birds just bounce off leaving a big ding. Those that you showed were laid across blades with no place to which they could slide off or bounce off.

The plane did not shear the poles. It just pushed them out of the way and the way and the bottoms of the pole broke under the torque. You got problems in Dodge pal!

 

there are three famous people that could explain this do you koko..names are sum ting wong..way to lo..ho le fuk..and dang bang ow..ever heard of these guys?

 

Eyewitnesses (police) saw the alleged plane fly over the navy annex and miss the light poles entirely.
So you need to prove those eyewitnesses are lying.

lateral strength

Mr plane meet the winner: Mr Pole

 

No. The base broke free and the pole went flipping end-over-end and broke. Anybody but an idiot can see that the base sheared exactly as designed.

I have no idea if that base broke free or if it was cut. The base when hit 50 feet above the mount is irrelevant of have you not been paying attention?

They are not designed to break from lateral force 50 feet in the air they are designed to break from lateral force of a car shattering the box for this particular design. The box is not shattered.

You mean the pole broke and went flipping end over end, otherwise cite how a pole can break by flipping it end over end LMAO

(*)(*)(*)(*)s pretty weak in dodge!







Sometimes the birds just bounce off leaving a big ding. Those that you showed were laid across blades with no place to which they could slide off or bounce off.

sorta like one of the big ole heavy 400 pound poles, no place to slide off!




The plane did not shear the poles. It just pushed them out of the way and the way and the bottoms of the pole broke under the torque. You got problems in Dodge pal!

ah ok they got in half by magic, yeh we can follow that. sure. of course.

Nope Dodge has a problem with me LOL.

 

No, they did not. You have never worked on a flight deck or on line standby on the crash crew, so you may not be familiar with the sorts of tricks persective will play on your mind. But ignorance of the facts does not absolve you.

Got proof?

 

Only an uneducated child believes that. Pressure applied at the top of a lever is transferred to the bottom of the lever. That's how a crowbar works. I knew that in Fifth Grade.

No, they are not designed to shatter. Shattering would lead to a total loss of control over which way the pole would fall. You would have cars driving into the bases and laying nasty great pikes horizontally behind them instead of pushing them over in the direction in which the vehicle was travelling. Start using your head here. We can see that internal structures in that box have been sheared. You need to learn to look at things as they actually are, not as some tin-foiled Nazi like Bollyn tells you they are supposed to be.

They are designed to bend in the wind. Nope Dodge has a problem with me.

 

Only an uneducated child believes that. Pressure applied at the top of a lever is transferred to the bottom of the lever. That's how a crowbar works. I knew that in Fifth Grade.

Ah that explains why they all fall over from a little breeze! Leverage! Whoda thunked it? Thanks for your in depth 5th grade analysis!

No, they are not designed to shatter. Shattering would lead to a total loss of control over which way the pole would fall.

In over your head again, as usual.

Start using your head here.

Oh for (*)(*)(*)(*) sake Mr obvious, dont blame me for your failing 1 line later! LMAO

We can see that internal structures in that box have been sheared. You need to learn to look at things as they actually are, not as some tin-foiled Nazi like Bollyn tells you they are supposed to be.

are you kidding? when you put up half assed 5th grade trougher explanations? It requires very little brain power to respond to this intense level of academic achievement seen out here.

They are designed to bend in the wind.

But your 5th grade explanation said that pressure on the top causes leverage and pressure makes them break away and fall over just like they were designed to do.

Good luck trying to get a 6th grader to accept that.

Nope Dodge has a problem with me

 

yeh the interview is on you tube try google, oh and you dont know me or my experience, please stop pretending you have a clue.

 

Building 7 fell for reasons other than fire. There are several buildings that have suffered much worse damage of fire and either still stood, or partially collapsed,but to completely fall like points to the obvious answer that the building was rigged.

 

Of course, the "demolition" just so happened to have coincided with the planes striking the towers. I mean it makes perfect sense given that what the world witnessed was in reality a hologram.

 

Good, then post one claim with evidence. We are still waiting

 

I am curious what do you call evidence?

a sworn statement from GW that he planned the whole thing or some such other brain-dead nonsense you typically see out here? I get the impression this is where this is headed.

 

Oh yes they can. The truther movement is proof positive.

 

Ok, you haven't a clue as to the meaning of evidence..... That's why you are a truther. Thanks for the clarification.