Can you be racist if? Can you be racist if you're black? CAN YOU BE A RACIST IF YOU'RE AN AFRICAN AMERICAN? The answer is NO!!!!!!!!!!!!! Not to American Democrat Politicians, or to their lacky media, whom they control, own, and pay. (ABC, NBC, CBS). Why don't Democrat Politicians care about black on black crime, and do something about it? because they don't! BUT JUST ASK YOUR DEMOCRAT POLITICIANS IN AMERICA, AND YOUR DEMOCRAT MEIDA IN AMERICA THIS..... IF YOU'RE ANY OTHER Ethnicity, besides Black, or African American, can you be a racist? Maybe, we should ask all the other "ETHINICITIES" THREWOUT America? Do you consider yourself, not Black or African American, in America? Then you're probably a "Racist", atleast to the Democrat Politicians!!!!!!!!!!!!! Does anyone want to know, why, most things like this will never gain traction? Because Democrat Politicians and their media, and their voters, keep it hindered Intentionally! and they do so, for a good reason. Because they realize, the truth hurts them. Alot!
Actually there's not that, because the Democrats who owned slaves lived 170+ years ago. And you can bet there were Republican slave owners too. Only complete morons try to equate a political party that existed that long ago with the current form that exists today. Doesn't matter what party you choose to do it with or what topic you're doing it for, it's always moronic.
Anybody of any race, religion, sexuality, etc etc can be racist. This isn't the Democrats telling you any differently, it's the morons on social media. Stop taking the morons on social media as being representative of millions of people, no matter what the topic.
Hi, RoanokeIllinois, Reference to a good dictionary will provide the answer to the questions asked. I recommend the Merriam-Webster(r), on-line version. Regards, stay safe 'n well.
Yeah after Republicans ended Democrats established the KKK and Jim Crow. After George Wallace's failed third party attempt demonstrated that there weren't enough racist asshats left to matter, Dems created a welfare state that destroyed the African American family and note the same issues persist among white welfare recipients. So no it isn't a race issue it's a family issue. You gut the family you destroy the child. And no a woman who thinks she's a man isn't a sufficient replacement for a dad nor is a man who thinks he's a woman a sufficient replacement for a woman. So while the Democrats are no longer the party of Jim Crow and the KKK, what they are the party of us far worse and in the end as they more and more closely align themselves with the Davos crowd they become more and more the party of slavery once again.
Any human can be racist, that's a dumb question. Individual racism isn't as much of a problem as systemic racism, which is in place to help white people. Of course, i know the systemic racism deniers are going to ask for a definition, which they will ignore when provided, so don't bother asking me that question.
Children don't need moms and dads more than they need adults in their life who care about them and look out for them. Far too much emphasis is placed on the gender of the parent and this is because of traditional gender stereotypes that tell you a kid can't learn something from a mom that they can from a dad and vice versa. It's complete nonsense and antiquated thinking from a world that was far more male oriented than the one we live in today. In reality, it's entirely dependent on the specific parent's personality, not their gender. So while you're right that the family unit is important, no argument there, the gender of those involved is of less consequence than the traditionalists would like it to be. And that's ultimately what they are raging against. The loss of the world they knew and the inability to adapt to the natural evolution of society. No, the Democrats are not more and more becoming the party of slavery, that's also complete tripe. There is nothing about welfare that equates to slavery. Slavery is not a choice! I know what point you're trying to make here, seen it a thousand times before, but it's dumb and it's wrong. There are rational ways to argue against entitlement programs that don't require you to venture into ridiculous land.
Actually its scientific fact that men and women think differently. For instance women can multi-task very easily compared to men who are not as good at multi-tasking. Where as men are more single task focused compared to women. Think about how that affects the ability to teach a girl or boy child and how/what they learn. NOTE: Before you start hollering, I have no problem with two people of the same sex raising a child. So long as they understand that it is a good idea to have someone of the childs opposite sex there as a role model also. The raising of children can be accomplished without such, and I'm not saying its absolutely needed. But if you want the most opportunities for a child, it is recommended. NOT NECESSARY. Just recommended. The biggest factor is of course a secure home with a schedule that is designed for the child in question, and enough income to handle all of the kids needs...including both the parents staying home as much as possible. And a same sex couple can accomplish that just as much as a heterosexual couple can.
The Democrats of yesteryear, are the same Democrats of today. They are still playing identity politics. The only difference is in who they are calling the villains.
There are certainly differences in the way men and women think but that is largely internal. Women aren't taught to multi-task by their mothers, they do it because mentally they are capable of doing it. Men can do it too, while some women can't. I don't disagree that having role models of the same gender can be a good thing, but even then it depends on the child and the value you place on learning gender roles that match your gender is entirely subjective. I'm sure there is a scientific formula out there for how to raise a child in the perfect environment, but it's applicability to real life is effectively nill because real life doesn't work the way a perfectly designed scientific environment needs to work.
And hereagain, identity politics has been a part of political discourse in this country for hundreds of years. It's not limited to the Democrats. The entire facade of the Republican party being the party of family values and the Democrats being the party of immorality is one example of identity politics on the right.
The main stream news media does seem to ignore the fact that when they advocate or ignore the conduct of people of color who commit crimes that those crooks often victimize people of their own race. The desire for law and order is not racially motivated. It’s a common desire that is fundamental to establishing and maintaining safe neighborhoods. Minority criminals should not be the recipients of “legal reparations.” Going to jail for criminal offenses, especially violent ones is not “systemic racism.”
Anyone who puts together a whole group of people of one race in order to criticize them unfairly is racist.
media personalities RE OAID BY THEIR BERY PROFITABLE CAPITALIST CORPORATE IWBERS, NOT THE DENOCRATIC PARTY.
media jerks are paid by their very profitable corporations from ad revenue generated by america's job creators, not the democratic party. as usual your trolling is tiresome.
