don't you worry.........in the process I will produce you one, to serve your personal satisfaction. polscie
do you think 3M is fair enough. I guess that is too small, given the fact that this thread is first of its kind. this is an opening door. this is global. polscie
if PF is serious from your viewpoint....so do I pocket some $ too? am not providing evidence,am not a believer of the claim in the belief in "GOD". polscie
you is "Incorporeal". origin is the appearance of the very inception of "GOD" to the equation in the existence of everything. polscie
these elements on the periodic table is your entry to my thread. actually, I am a bit lost with these periodic table of yours. I deny any responsibility to these elements periodic table of yours. polscie
First of all, it is not my periodic table. Secondly, regarding your denial of that periodic table.... Of course you are lost with regard to that table... should anything else have been expected?
I see that there are still no takers that are wanting to give a whirl at explaining where those numbers on the original periodic table came from. Watzamatta? Cat got your tongues? Is this a scientific issue that is so basic in its construction that it surpasses your ability to give an honest, truthful and efficient explanation?
Before I give your answer, please explain what you mean by "original periodic table". The way elements were "originally" arranged on the periodic table was different than how we do it today, as our knowledge has greatly increased since then. If you truly are referring to this old "original" method, why? It is irrelevant now. If it was a slip and you mean the current periodic table, please be more specific and I will answer.
I see no reason for criticizing an attempt to "catalog God, provided it is recognized that God is not a material entity. God is a spiritual entity and a list of God's spiritual attributes might reveal some kind of periodicity. But this remains to be demonstrated. Ludwik Kowalski (see Wikipedia) .
Exactly my point Ludwik. Demonstration. Showing objective empirical evidence of any of his claims regarding the nature or attributes of God. To show empirically, those attributes, it is necessary to reveal the source of those attributes, so that the source can be examined by others who desire to validate that information.
An impossibility for me or anyone else to totally, completely, and without any omissions to name all of the attributes of God. Therefore conclusively stating that God, in His entirety, cannot be placed in a simple little box of definitions because some part or attribute will have been overlooked. Subsequently the desire expressed in the OP is just an exercise in futility.
Good questions. Have you completed the research as yet? When you do, let us know what the outcome is.
I am not here to feed your brain. I am here to cut open what is not seen by the world. because the whole world has been having a wrong belief. you could not even forward a single answer because your answer shall provide no more than a correct one. polscie.
