Sorry mate, I was trying to quote the other bloke. His 'expert', etc... I'm probably on 'ignore' now so I doubt he'll get the message anyhow.
No we want evidence. What you are saying is there are specific chemicals in these trails, show one piece of evidence, just ONE. The problem is you make a fantastical accusation and then say "prove me wrong". Okay, I think people who believe in chemtrails or aliens or are truthers have a mental disorder....I mean look at them.....prove me wrong.
As another poster pointed out, you're dealing with the faithful here. They don't need facts or evidence, because they 'know'...just like religious nutters 'know' their gods exist because a book told them so.
Well, I think there is lots of proof here: http://www.wanttoknow.info/g/chemtrails You can dismiss it or you can read it and respond to it. Check out the patents that are a direct result of chemtrails. Now please respond with something more than hot air, if you are interested in more than rhetoric.
Interesting link. There's a few things I take issue with though. The website lists a couple of revelations in senatorial committees. After researching the committees themselves. There does not appear to be any mention of Chemtrail usage. The 1969-1977 committee it refers to seems to be the committee on nutrition and human needs and does not seem to list anything that relates to chemtrails. Also the Church committee did not refer to chemtrails.
That is the thing, references to things sound like evidence but when investigated is nothing. Some guy brings a "sample" to a TV station and they find barium. No evidence of where the sample came from. Still trying to figure out the purpose of the ubiquitous spraying that people are talking about. No test would be done if everyone is sprayed. Also no mention that that certain atmospheric conditions will allow the contrails to last a lot longer than normal. But lying is not a problem for the chemtrail crowd. Look here: http://metabunk.org/threads/661-Debunked-Chemtrail-Plane-Interior-(Ballast-Barrels)
Oh I don't believe any of it. I just think the only way combat the chemtrail argument is the empirical application of reason and knowledge. But in all fairness if there's any validity then we'll know.
