Chic-fil-A Anti-gay?

Antoine was right, "you know the waffle fries is bangin"

[video=youtube;LUmoTOujJ7Q]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LUmoTOujJ7Q[/video]

 

Gayocrat bullies just found another victim. It is also a great opportunity to get attention, "gays" love the attention because one of the many characteristics of their mental-sexual illness is their gigantic attention wh*ring.

 

Homosexual people are correct to fight for equal rights; homosexual couples should be allowed to marry legally in every state. Religion associated with the same, should be handled on a case-by-case basis.

Of course, publicity matters in politics. There is no doubt about that.

And here, we have one of the most STUPID forms of stereotyping I've ever seen. What idiocy!

In the above, I see ignorance, fear, hatred and a fairly ample amount of irrational animus; the kind of thinking that will surely lose an argument in a court of law. In that sense, I am highly encouraged.

 

I really love this...

We don't like what the Chic-Fil-A owner says so lets give him billions of dollars of free advertising and increase his business by at least double.

Then the Christians will claim the Lord blessed him because he stood by the Word.

You can't make this stuff up folks!!!!

Hilarious!!!!!

 

Sorry all I got from your post was "Whaaaa I don't like gays and their civil rights."

 

perhaps the poster does not like gays but nobody supports the denial of civil rights. The GOP fought and won that battle in the 60's but that was about race, not what you do in your bedroom

 

of course you did.

 

Frankly I'm more of a moderate.

I think both sides of the issues are to busy frothing at the mouth and spewing hate to listen to reason.

However, as a person who doesn't define himself by his sexual orientation...I am done allowing others to pin labels on me and treat me as if one single characteristic is the sum of who I am.

So no, I won't take crap from anyone on anyside and I call it like I see it.

 

The same people condemning this restaurant also champion anti-gay Muslims.

 

BINGO

if you look at 2 women walking down the street you have no clue if one is gay or not. Everything is the same except how they have sex. If I'm sick, I want a Dr. I don't care if the Dr has straight or gay sex.

If my car is broken I need a mechanic, again, could care less what they do in their bedroom

It is only the gay movement who feels what they do in the bedroom is what defines them; I will never understand that and will never ever support any legislation which also allows the creation of rules/laws based upon how one group engages in sex. Nope, people who are gay have the same exact CIVIL RIGHTS as every other man and woman

We need less govt intrusion, not more

 

So would you be in favor of removing the government completely from marriage? No more special rights based on people's relationship status? Because that is how I have always wanted it. Less government in people's personal lives. It's none of their business to be meddling in who's married to who and dishing out tax breaks and other benefits for it.

 

Despite various chicken sandwiches, religion, homophobia and the rest... this kind of young person is what will change things to the way things should be in America. It is just a matter of time.

Plenty of people who aren't gay (in your mind), are around you and near you. And they WILL change this nation in due time.

For a guy from the "South", I love his father's overall reaction!!

 

yes yes yes yes yes

let's remove sex completely out of the topic and disregard what this hypothetical person does in the bedroom


single
never had kids
worked as an employee since 16 years of age
currently 65 years old

person dies

why cannot the money paid into the system or a healthy portion of it by both the employee and employer be willed to charity, or another family member?

hmmm, not a gay issue is it?

another example

single adult wants to purchase family plan medical at work and add his/her sibling to the plan. THe employee is not allowed despite the willing ness to pay the increased fa,ily plan rate. Again, not a gay issue is it?

You see, the things you whine about are not issues just because you sleep with the same sex. The govt over-stepped by anointing this thing called marriage and moving away from the individual

I will not and cannot in good conscience support any more intrusion in that regard

 

Well it looks like we agree on a lot more than previously thought sec. The guvn'mint needs to get the heck out of everybody's bedroom!

 

there are a lot of people who feel this way. We do not support gay marriage or incest marriage or any of it. It's not because it grosses us out or we're homophobes; it's because you don't add more stupidity to already existing stupidity. The root cause needs to be fixed and that is over-reach of the govt.

The biggest challenge is that even though gay folk might agree that any govt "sanctioned" marriage is an over-step, the gay folk continue to support liberals who keep piling on more and more govt.

It's like complaining about being overweight while you are dining on a Big Mac.

 

Well, I guess the heterosexual crowd has be caught with their pants down. We are all anti-gay, if we apply this posters theory to everyone who isn't gay. What clear and logical reasoning.
I guess, then, those who chose the celibate lifestyle must be anti-gay as well. Itcould very well be those who are waiting for the partner (applied to non-gays) are anti-gay as well.
Ergo, anyone who is not gay is anti-gay. If we are attracted to the opposite sex we are bigots and homophobes.
One of the premises of marriage is to propogate the species. Those who practice same sex marriages do not propogate. They must depend on "borrowed assets" to create a family structure. Whether the female gay has artificial insemination, or male gays adopt, the child is not of their creation, it involves third party assets, or "borrowed."
That statement should not be viewed as bigoted, but as a truth.
If you say you believe in God, then how can you function as a man or woman, if you do not practice the most basic tenents of the Christian faith, Creationism?

 

I think the homosexual rights side of the argument would be far more effective if they tried an argument similar to what you wrote.

Rather than try to hijack marriage - something that many people feel very strongly about - in order to gain the rights of legacy, why not just fight to allow each person to choose their own legacy, regardless of marital status?

If the group got laws adjusted where any individual may give legacy rights to any other individual they choose, it would still allow married individuals to pass things - inheritance, benefits, etc - to their spouse or children. It would also allow homosexuals to do the same for their partners.

This would negate the arguments from the sanctity of marriage crowd and would give homosexuals their desired rights.

 

No, LOL!

I agree it wasn't some perfectly-wrapped comment.

No, not that either. I'm not an extremist (in case you didn't know).

Not really.

What would you say is an example of something that is anti-homosexual? I'm curious.

Wrong, again.

"One" premise (as some perceive it)... not ALL. Not even ALL heterosexuals are in it for the 'propagation'; and that is obvious.

Incorrect.

Just as MANY opposite sex couples rely upon their that nature has provided. So, that are YOU saying? Nothing so reasonable, I suspect.

And is there something particularly wrong with that as an option? Not to mention that whatever ANY COUPLE makes use of is DONATED, not "borrowed. I think an anti-homosexual person might very well make the kind of argument you just did.

Many people are amazingly bigoted against homosexual people. And they tend to get back what they dish out. No 'excuse' actually makes up for their consistently irrational animus.

Because God (as MANY see or believe in Him), is NOT LIMITED TO YOUR PERCEPTIONS or biblical beliefs of Him. Do you not realize that?

I've seen more than a few theologians mitigate the thoughts/beliefs of Bible-Thumping Christians. Those who are so militantly fundamentalist that they would never hear from such a theologian... don't likely realize that EVERYONE does NOT believe exactly as they themselves do. And while (problem) it isn't limited to Christians in America... it is a serious issue that plagues many who are of a religious mindset.

And Lord knows, the obsession with America's Christians over homosexuals, instead of so many other things that are actually destroying families and the lives of others, is astoundingly hypocritical. Really, they won't sound-off to this degree about:

War
Death by Firearms
Greed
Usury
Lack of Compassion for the Poor
Hunger
Divorce
Clamoring for Power
Lying for Political Gain... and more

The list of things which these misguided "believers" seem to push aside in some no-holds-barred, sporting-event to hunt down and persecute HOMOSEXUALS (so exclusively) is beyond 'vast'. They hypocrisy is so THICK... one can cut it with a "Bible".

 

You have to "procreate" to be a "Christian"? (Answer is: No, you don't.)

Now, who told YOU that?

 

If they gave the government entitlements and tax breaks of marriage to just any two people, they would cease to be special rights. Gays are all about gaining special rights for gays. Thus this decades long push for GAY MARRIAGE and no push for equality for all.

 

Oh yeah... THAT must be true. (But it isn't.)

Please, stop lying.

 

One of their favorite argument is that marriage is overinclusive, in that it includes couples who have no ability or desire to procreate. And their solution is to make it EVEN MORE overinclusive by including gays.

 

Dont confuse your inability to accept reality with a lie.