Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

Children will win the fight for same sex marriage and adoption by gays!

Discussion in 'Gay & Lesbian Rights' started by ProgressivePatriot, Jan 26, 2015.

Page 23 of 25
  1. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Actually, Ive been told over and over again, that I did argue that procreation is "required for marriage"
     
    dixon76710, Jul 5, 2015
    #551
  2. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Heterosexual couples (one man and one woman), not necessarily "heterosexuals". And as opposed to the argument that procreation is "required for marriage", as you alleged.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 5, 2015
    #552
  3. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    .............
     
    dixon76710, Jul 5, 2015
    #553
  4. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    And again...the court destroyed that argument.

    That "promoting" heterosexuals to marry and procreate is not the purpose of marriage.
     
    Osiris Faction, Jul 5, 2015
    #554
  5. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Silly little man. The court didnt address what my argument is or is not. Thats the role youve taken on.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 6, 2015
    #555
  6. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    By saying same sex couples can't marry because they can't procreate, or only opposite sex couples can marry because only they procreate(which isn't true)you are arguing from a position that procreation is required, otherwise it's nonsensical.

    Like I keep saying, you don't fool anyone with this game.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Right, has nothing to do with procreation in the law. Posting paternity statutes don't change that.
     
    rahl, Jul 6, 2015
    #556
  7. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, its overinclusive. Government isnt concerned with married couples not procreating and are instead concerned with unmarried couples doing so.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 6, 2015
    #557
  8. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    its an invalid argument. That's why you lost.

    Government isn't concerned with either. Procreation is irrelevant to who can marry.
     
    rahl, Jul 6, 2015
    #558
  9. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, it is now. With marriage extended to homosexuals because they might adopt or use artificial means to create a child.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 6, 2015
    #559
  10. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Always was.

    Marriage wasn't extended to homosexuals. Bans on same sex marriage were removed.
     
    rahl, Jul 6, 2015
    #560
  11. Flintc

    Flintc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,879
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This sounds like an argument as to whether the batter hit the pitch, or the pitcher hit the bat. The result is the same. Whatever the hell dixon claims he's not saying this time, the law is pretty definitive. I expect at least one definitive decision that religion grants no exemptions from the law.
     
    Flintc, Jul 6, 2015
    #561
  12. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So the opponents of same sex marriage did not try to use an argument for procreation being the center of marriage?

    Oh wait they did. And they lost.

    It's okay I know you'll never admit reality, that you will play silly little semantics games, and circular logic to try to escape reality.

    You've lost.
     
    Osiris Faction, Jul 6, 2015
    #562
  13. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    He'll endlessly run in circles because he will never admit the truth of his argument.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Exactly. Because that was always how it was.

    Marriage was extended to heterosexuals who could not or would not procreate. Why would it be any different for homosexuals?

    That's exactly where you're entire argument fall apart.
     
    Osiris Faction, Jul 6, 2015
    #563
  14. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Rahls the one running circles. Heres two different courts addressing and rejecting Rahls silly arguments and agreeing with mine.

     
    dixon76710, Jul 6, 2015
    #564
  15. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,641
    Likes Received:
    18,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Dude, there are more productive hobbies than arguing with dixon. You could ram your head into a brick wall or use your teeth to turn glass into sand.

    It's the same circular argument he has been pitching for years. It goes from procreation, to paternity, to some appeal to history and back again.
     
    Polydectes, Jul 7, 2015
    #565
  16. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Procreation and paternity and it 1000s of years of history in marriage is all a part of the same argument, youve never been able to grasp.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 7, 2015
    #566
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Both outdated and overturned. Your argument has been ruled nonsense. Because procreation is not and never has been a requirement for marriage.

    - - - Updated - - -

    It's all part of your failed argument. That's why you lost.
     
    rahl, Jul 7, 2015
    #567
  18. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Hey guess what?

    Doesn't change the fact that the Obergefell case made same sex marriage legal in all fifty states.
     
    Osiris Faction, Jul 7, 2015
    #568
  19. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,641
    Likes Received:
    18,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Homosexualpuerile can procreate, whenthe parents are unknown what importance does paternity play? And there was thousands of years of slavery, nobility,and subservient women.That crap just ended one day.And it's a good thing.

    So you don't grasp how your arguments are irrelevant.
     
    Polydectes, Jul 7, 2015
    #569
  20. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Dont know what a Homosexualpuerile is, but a homosexual couple cant procreate. At most ONE of the couple and a third party can procreate. My dog and I can procreate using your logic.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 8, 2015
    #570
  21. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No one has claimed otherwise.
     
    dixon76710, Jul 8, 2015
    #571
  22. Flintc

    Flintc New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2010
    Messages:
    11,879
    Likes Received:
    79
    Trophy Points:
    0
    And it won't make a trace of difference to procreation.
     
    Flintc, Jul 8, 2015
    #572
  23. Polydectes

    Polydectes Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 21, 2010
    Messages:
    53,641
    Likes Received:
    18,218
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So what?
     
    Polydectes, Jul 8, 2015
    #573
  24. Osiris Faction

    Osiris Faction Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    6,938
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So then you admit the cases you quoted are as of now obsolete?

    You do understand that the Obergefell ruling invalidated them?

    - - - Updated - - -

    So what? Procreation isn't required for marriage.

    You said as much yourself.
     
    Osiris Faction, Jul 8, 2015
    #574
  25. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,665
    Likes Received:
    4,510
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Youre contradicting yourself.

     
    dixon76710, Jul 9, 2015
    #575
Page 23 of 25

Share This Page