Chris Christie, YES PLEASE!

Why are you calling me that? Makes no sense.
On another note, why continue to belabor the point with Overitall? He’s given you an explanation. Time for you to agree to disagree.

 

Precisely

 

Leave it at that? It doesn’t look like you’re “leaving it at that”.

 

I can quote the ECA again if you want and you can run and hide from it again if you want. Up to you. Or maybe you can finally address it.

 

Are you willing to do what @Overitall won't and actually address the ECA?

 

He’s done. Leave it like you said you would.

 

Is saying "you can run and hide" addressing any argument I made or is it directed at the character of the man you're addressing instead?

 

Ah, the "Let's just pretend the law doesn't exist" excuse. Fun times. I'll note that.

 

He can't.

 

You claimed that Trump's attempts to overthrow the election were allowed by the ECA. I quoted the ECA proving that you were wrong. You refused to read the ECA or to address it at all. This is addressing the failure of the arguments of the man I'm addressing. The man may be a perfectly nice guy. But his arguments with regards to this are garbage.

 

You didn't answer my question.

 

Just like you are incapable of actually addressing the ECA after pretending that it backed up your claims. YOU were the one who brought up the ECA here. And now you are upset someone actually read it and that it doesn't actually support what you falsely claimed it supports.

 

You've never answered any of mine. Come to think of it, I don't think you've ever answered any of my questions even while you demand I answer yours. Weird how that works. But here's some charity: I did answer your question. When can I pencil you in for answering any of mine?

 

You're projecting. I'm amused by your feeble attempts to steer me in the direction you want to go without conceding the point I made. I even suggested a simple solution to this empass -- agree to disagree and move on.

 

How many pages before you answer my question about the ECA? I've already answered yours. I can only assume that you are conceding that you are either unwilling or unable to defend your position.

 

Let me check my calendar.

 

You can assume whatever you like.

 

Cool. So I answer your questions and you refuse to answer even one of mine.

 

Depends.

 

Are you willing to answer a single question or not? I've answered all of yours.

 

Yes.

 

Let's say we have one set of EC votes that aren't approved by the executive under the seal of the state and one that is. Which of those votes should be counting according to the ECA?

 

That's another question. I already told you the stipulation for addressing it.

 

You said you were willing to answer a question. I asked you a question. Will you be a man of your word an answer the question you said you would answer?

 

You asked if I was willing to answer a question. I answered -- yes (to that question).