Why are you changing the subject? Admit first that your one picture does not tell the whole story, then I'll address your strawman question. (Where do you get the misconception that there was 'little to no debris left'?)
Why are you so thick? A picture tells a thousand stories...didn't they teach you that? Perhaps not eh...sad... So OK...debris at the Pentagon...for what its worth... Wow...that's somethin' hey Elroy... OMG! It says "AA" and its HUGE!!! Now lets look at some REAL plane crash debris shall we? Now that's more real...isn't it Hannibal... Part all over the place...gee that's more believable...
Where is the building that the second plane in your series hit? You are trying to make an honest comparison, aren't you? Perhaps you are not aware that AA77 didn't crash on the lawn, it crashed into the building? You could show the pictures from inside, but that wouldn't help your case any. Here are a few.
Ya I've seen that MASSIVE collection of bits and pieces. UNFORTUNATELY...there is little to nothing outside where the plane struck the wall. No engines...not wings...no tail... Just some stuff found 2 to 3 days later. Gee...how convenient... Face it shill...NOTHING about the explanation of that morning makes any common sense what so ever. Films confiscated...men not 100 feet from the crash live...a second plane...lack of wreckage where you'd expect arms and legs and all sorts of debris... And that's not even considering the WTC or that other plane. We may never know the truth...but I can tell you this with the utmost of certainty...what we have been told is a lie.
Actually,the only thing you can say with any degree of truth,is that NO ONE will shake your belief that men and women who took an oath to defend their country were somehow behind one of the largest attacks in this country's history over a group of well funded extremists who a few years earlier had declared war on the US. And you have the GALL to wonder why we're here.
How much would you expect to be outside? The plane didn't crash on the lawn, it crashed into the building. As you say, the evidence is MASSIVE. But you close your eyes to the evidence and believe the woo.
There you go... This should be entertaining watching the back peddling on this one. LOL Man, plane everywhere! LOL Seriously folks, you all can't be that stupid, and common sense should certainly be kicking in on this one...
The same guys who told an oathe to defend their country were the same ones who went AWOL and fled during the critical 11th hour once they found out NOW was the time their country needed defending. Don't sit here and pretend this "oath" means anything to these leaders, as an argument as though they couldn't possibly back down on their oath, when that is what they CLEARLY did. Such an oathe means NOTHING to these "leaders".
Still looking for pieces of the plane (or anything indicating a plane crash). Haven't seen it yet. Maybe somebody could point something out that I'm missing? A picture really does tell a thousand words (none of which spell PLANE CRASH). Those big black spots though...I'm curious. That where pieces of the alleged plane hit, before it didn't hit the ground first, or after? Gosh....I just can't get over that huge hole hiding the plane.
Exactly how did they go 'awol'?And the damage was already done And I'll expect any oath our leaders took to be valid, and it's absurd to claim they backed down fron that oath. And what evidence have you that their oaths mean nothing to them?
I guess this thread is like the buried (LOL) Flight 93. Just a claim with no supportive evidence. Where did the plane go? Can anyone point to even a small sample????
Most persons have even the slightest grasp of their native language, and people who speak English would know that to "tell" something can mean to express in words, and would have known that soon after learning how to speak. "tell1    /tɛl/ Show Spelled [tel] Show IPA ,verb, told, tell·ing. verb (used with object) 1. to give an account or narrative of; narrate; relate (a story, tale, etc.): to tell the story of Lincoln's childhood. 2. to make known by speech or writing (a fact, news, information, etc.); communicate. 3. to announce or proclaim. 4. to utter (the truth, a lie, etc.). 5. to express in words (thoughts, feelings, etc.)." Are you telling me oaths aren't expressed in words!??!?!?!? LMAO.. What have I told you about consulting your dictionary before you try to play grammar police, in order that you don't come across utterly foolish?
The top two positions in the U.S. military chain of command, also known as the National Command Authority consists of the Commander in Chief and the Secretary of Defense. AFTER finding out the country was under attack, when MILITARY response was URGENTLY required, what did they do? Bush continued reading the pet goat and then proceeded to preoccupy NOT on his constitutional duty, i.e. commander in chief of the U.S. military, but instead "projecting calm" and then addressing the nation (NOT his constitutional role). SECDEF continued with business as usual, failed to report to the NMCC where people like the National Security Advisor, staffers from the Joint Chiefs of Staff etc. were expecting him.. After learning of the attack he did NOTHING to deal with it until well too late. Hell he ADMITTED he was out of the loop? Why? His country was under attack! False.. This was BEFORE the Pentagon was struck. Do you really believe this? I won't call you naive here but c'mon! So they DID take decisive and prompt action to defend the country? NONSENSE.. See above for proof otherwise. The fact that they don't honor them... Especially the one about "uphold and defend the constitution of the US". Okay so the oaths don't mean nothing to them? Would it help if I rephrased and said they mean very little to them?
