Congress/CSPAN refuses to answer WTC7 call in questions

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 13, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So judgmental.

    I haven't said anything about you that you haven't said yourself. You are the one that said your goal was to validate your feelings. I merely pointed out that this is not a pathway to the truth. Now you're judging me for things I haven't said. You're also saying you know to question yourself? That statement is in direct conflict with this one:

    It's a very strong gut feeling for me and I will stand by that.... I'll wait for validation, no matter how long it takes

    I'd also like to add that you did something that's typical for truthers. You didn't bother to review information that was made available to you, but that didn't stop you from making assumptions about it. Katheryn Schulz is not a psychologist, and she wasn't talking about common sense.
     
  2. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Like I said, consider vetting your "sources".
     
  3. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    10,644
    Likes Received:
    3,694
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The problem isn't his conviction. It's his inadequacy.

    Of course, no one can adequately validate a delusion, so there's only two alternatives:

    1. Rejection of the delusion
    2. Apathy to reality
     
  4. patriot43

    patriot43 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2013
    Messages:
    180
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yep, ya'll got me all figured out. Nice try. Say whatever you like, your not honest with yourself. None of that (*)(*)(*)(*) you just posted bothers me. None of it! I (*)(*)(*)(*) on the graves of the 9/11 victims? Huh! They've been pissed on from the start by their own government numerous times and from people like you, not me. I expect the investigation will happen and when it does I hope you cry about it like you're crying about the mere aspect of it happening.

    Bye-Bye
     
  5. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Its already happened, your theories have been shown to be without merit and substatiative physical evidence. Bye-Bye.
     
  6. djlunacee

    djlunacee New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2013
    Messages:
    1,489
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Thanks for the laugh, where's your real evidence?
     
  7. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LoL. later kiddo
     
  8. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow,I thought koko and Fraud were out there...
     
  9. cjnewson88

    cjnewson88 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2013
    Messages:
    1,133
    Likes Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    48
    whose sock is patriot43?
     
  10. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's a good question, I think NAB called it out a bit earlier in the thread. I am not sure, honestly, but I definitely think it belongs to someone. He\She spells too well to be happy fun dude, RTW or Koko.
     
  11. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You know, we have people who visit us here in Connecticut just to claims the Sandy Hook massacre never occurred...and they get the same reaction. I wonder why?
     
  12. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    isnt it nice to know people trust you
     
  13. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, it's both scary and sad to know, there are people who have no critical thinking skill, like you, out there.
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Perhaps I've read it prior to when I posted it? Seriously? That's it?

    - - - Updated - - -


    First off, that entire article just assumes that it is a fact that building 7 was a CD, which it obviously isn't.


    "Obviously". Cite your source. I mean, it was so obvious...there HAS to be a source...right? Or did somebody simply claim that it wasn't? Help me out.
     
  15. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    People are ignorant?
     
  16. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Sandy Hook CT whackadoodles are way beyond ignorant. They add a whole new dimension to stupid.

    After a while, the grownups just get tired of responding to them.

    They are a lot like you lot in that sense.
     
  17. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are marginalize the loss of life and continue to cause more pain and suffering to the families of those who were murdered that day. They are disgusting excuses for human beings.
     
  18. plague311

    plague311 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2012
    Messages:
    1,256
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You want sources that say building 7 wasn't a demo? Do a search for "NIST Building 7". That would bring it up better than anything else. You can look at the popular mechanics piece.

    The one thing that I think escapes you is that the NIST report was done by a bunch of professionals. It wasn't done by 4 or 5 people. All of those professionals came to the conclusion that building 7 wasn't a demo. So the NIST report isn't a single source, it's a collection of professional explanations to the reason why it fell.
     
  19. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh, I already know the (his) reply to this one!
     
  20. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,828
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It looks like the WTC7 building will remain a mystery.
     

Share This Page