Congress/CSPAN refuses to answer WTC7 call in questions

So judgmental.

I haven't said anything about you that you haven't said yourself. You are the one that said your goal was to validate your feelings. I merely pointed out that this is not a pathway to the truth. Now you're judging me for things I haven't said. You're also saying you know to question yourself? That statement is in direct conflict with this one:

It's a very strong gut feeling for me and I will stand by that.... I'll wait for validation, no matter how long it takes

I'd also like to add that you did something that's typical for truthers. You didn't bother to review information that was made available to you, but that didn't stop you from making assumptions about it. Katheryn Schulz is not a psychologist, and she wasn't talking about common sense.

 

Like I said, consider vetting your "sources".

 

The problem isn't his conviction. It's his inadequacy.

Of course, no one can adequately validate a delusion, so there's only two alternatives:

1. Rejection of the delusion
2. Apathy to reality

 

Yep, ya'll got me all figured out. Nice try. Say whatever you like, your not honest with yourself. None of that (*)(*)(*)(*) you just posted bothers me. None of it! I (*)(*)(*)(*) on the graves of the 9/11 victims? Huh! They've been pissed on from the start by their own government numerous times and from people like you, not me. I expect the investigation will happen and when it does I hope you cry about it like you're crying about the mere aspect of it happening.

Bye-Bye

 

Its already happened, your theories have been shown to be without merit and substatiative physical evidence. Bye-Bye.

 

Thanks for the laugh, where's your real evidence?

 

LoL. later kiddo

 

Wow,I thought koko and Fraud were out there...

 

whose sock is patriot43?

 

That's a good question, I think NAB called it out a bit earlier in the thread. I am not sure, honestly, but I definitely think it belongs to someone. He\She spells too well to be happy fun dude, RTW or Koko.

 

You know, we have people who visit us here in Connecticut just to claims the Sandy Hook massacre never occurred...and they get the same reaction. I wonder why?

 

isnt it nice to know people trust you

 

No, it's both scary and sad to know, there are people who have no critical thinking skill, like you, out there.

 

Perhaps I've read it prior to when I posted it? Seriously? That's it?

- - - Updated - - -

First off, that entire article just assumes that it is a fact that building 7 was a CD, which it obviously isn't.

"Obviously". Cite your source. I mean, it was so obvious...there HAS to be a source...right? Or did somebody simply claim that it wasn't? Help me out.

 

People are ignorant?

 

The Sandy Hook CT whackadoodles are way beyond ignorant. They add a whole new dimension to stupid.

After a while, the grownups just get tired of responding to them.

They are a lot like you lot in that sense.

 

They are marginalize the loss of life and continue to cause more pain and suffering to the families of those who were murdered that day. They are disgusting excuses for human beings.

 

You want sources that say building 7 wasn't a demo? Do a search for "NIST Building 7". That would bring it up better than anything else. You can look at the popular mechanics piece.

The one thing that I think escapes you is that the NIST report was done by a bunch of professionals. It wasn't done by 4 or 5 people. All of those professionals came to the conclusion that building 7 wasn't a demo. So the NIST report isn't a single source, it's a collection of professional explanations to the reason why it fell.

 

Oh, I already know the (his) reply to this one!

 

It looks like the WTC7 building will remain a mystery.