COVID19 Fraud - Fauci, Daszak, Gates, stand charged for Nuremberg Violations.

Attorney Hannah Rose and seven applicants brought the Nuremberg action on behalf of the victims, the entire population of the United Kingdom. She filed the legal proceeding with the International Criminal Court located at The Hague. The Hague is notable for its long history in helping victims seek redress for war crimes and defining appropriate ethical guidelines for conduct during war.

In a stunning 46-page legal filing to the International Criminal Court on December 6, an intrepid attorney and seven applicants accused Anthony Fauci, Peter Daszak, Melinda Gates, William Gates III, and twelve others of numerous violations of the Nuremberg Code. These included various crimes against humanity and war crimes as defined by the Rome Statutes, Articles 6, 7, 8, 15, 21, and 53.

....a set of principles was developed, which ultimately led to the development of the Nuremberg Code.

These principles essentially meant that anyone, no matter how wealthy or powerful, even a head of state, was not above the law. The fact that the law of their home nation would permit their action would not relieve the person from justice under international law.

As we all know, before receiving a surgical procedure, there is a legal and ethical requirement that the patient be apprised of any significant potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve damage, or even death. The patient usually signs the consent form following this explanation. And as we all know, whenever we receive prescription medication, we are notified of the potential risks on a package insert and usually a discussion with the Pharmacist.

A person about to receive the jab is rarely told that there are risks of blood clots, bleeding, cerebral thrombosis, myocarditis, and death, yet those risks exist.

Attorney Hannah Rose notes in Point 40 of her brief that the ethical standards of the Nuremberg Code amount to an obligation on physicians and pharmaceutical manufacturers to abide by its principles. Accordingly, any physician or research scientist found to have breached any of the ten principles of the Nuremberg Code would face criminal liability.

“The first principle of the Nuremberg Code is a willingness and informed consent by the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention, either through force, deceit, fraud, threat, solicitation, or any other type of binding or coercion.”

In Point 43 she argues, “When the heads of the Ministry of Health as well as the Prime Minister presented the vaccine in the United Kingdom and began the vaccination of United Kingdom residents, the vaccinated were not advised, that in practice, they would be taking part in a medical experiment and that their consent is required under the Nuremberg Code. This as a matter of fact is a genetic medical experiment on human beings performed without informed consent under a severe and blatant offense of the Nuremberg Code.”

Besides the four kingpins, twelve others were named, including the CEOs of the leading vaccine corporations and the health leaders held accountable for the United Kingdom.

Albert Bourla, CEO of Pfizer
Stephane Bancel, CEO of Moderna
Pascal Soriot, CEO of Astra Zeneca
Alex Gorsky, CEO of Johnson and Johnson
Tedros Adhanhom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the WHO
Boris Johnson, UK Prime Minister
Christopher Whitty, UK Chief Medical Adviser
Matthew Hancock, former UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
Sajid Javid, current UK Secretary of State for Health and Social Care
June Raine, UK Chief Executive of Medicines and Healthcare products
Dr. Rajiv Shah, President of the Rockefeller Foundation
Klaus Schwab, President of the World Economic Forum


Holocaust survivor Vera Sharav issued a statement in Points 34b and 34c:

More HERE


Dr David E. Martin Exposes Anthony Fauci & the CDC

”Let’s make sure we are clear…[Covid 19...] This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine.”


”This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards [1]. And the vaccine specifically has to stimulate both the immunity within the person receiving it and it also has to disrupt transmission. More







Appears they are using the same failed model they used for infuenza Vax, why do his findings not surprise me? Something definitely seems fishy, especially after reviewing the phizer docs!

 

Fauci dodges senator Kaines question with non-responsive strawman answer and Kaine did not challenge the dodge! If this was an average american (not a guv actor) they would relentlessly hammer an average into the ground until the question was answered on point or a guilty determination was entered, or in his case a point of acknowledgement entered into the record for prosecution purposes. Instead Kaine 'quickly' says ok.......and drops it!

As an attorney we know for a fact that Kaine is well aware the question was dodged and he neglected to do his duty and obligation to his elected office.

Timothy Michael Kaine is an American lawyer and politician serving as the junior United States senator from Virginia since 2013. A member of the Democratic Party, he served as the 38th lieutenant governor of Virginia from 2002 to 2006 and 70th governor of Virginia from 2006 to 2010.

Tim Kaine - Wikipedia

Then again maybe Im wrong and it really is the will of the people, to have guv actors take over and mandate our medicine, feed us bullshit and force us to accept shoddy strawman reasoning as fact?

 

What is the Gates' connection? How are they lumped into this group?

 

I'm betting a lot to do about nothing.

 

Funding commitments to fight COVID-19 - Gates Foundation
https://www.gatesfoundation.org › covid19-contributions
Since January 2020, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has committed more than US$2 billion to the global COVID-19 response.

 

Nuremberg violations are nothing? alrighty then!

 

Did you read the breakdown of those funds?

 

I don't think any of those people have been "charged" with anything.

 

I havent seen the evidence entered into the court at this point so we have to wait to get the specifics.

 

Ah, okay. So just another opportunity to berate Bill and Melinda Gates for sharing their money with various charitable organizations throughout the world.

 

What evidence? What court? There's not even any evidence that International Court will take the case. Only a letter acknowledging receipt. Nor is there any evidence that Ms. Rose is a lawyer...

 

dup

 

have you considered actually 'reading' the links provided?
I find it very helpful

Is it?
Wow so you have access to evidence that has not been entered into court yet?
Please share it with us!

 

Well, you might find it very helpful but none of it establishes that the case will be heard by, the ICC, let alone that it has any merits.

 

Thats why we have courts isnt?

 

Yea, but your thread title implies that they have been "charged", when really they are just accused, which doesn't really mean anything.

 

Yes, a brief submits charges to the court against a defendant, it is an accusation, or at the least a presumption of guilt, the court then decides.

 

"presumption of guilt"? i guess the person writing the brief has a presumption of guilt, but it doesn't really mean anything at all.

 

I read the link stating their contributions. I see nothing nefarious - but as you say, we haven't seen the court docs. But until then, its as I said - two people donating huge sums to assist in pandemic relief.

 

Yes, and a court can toss a case - refuse to entertain it because it has no merit.

 

DUH thats why people take their complaints to court!

 

DUH, you're the one who started a thread that says they have been charged in the title.

 

meaningless to the fact the brief charges them with crimes

 

Thats what filing a complaint does DUH

 

So you dont think you need to see the actual evidence entered into the court huh?