Discussion in '9/11' started by Maria99, Mar 24, 2014.
<sigh> a truther site?...Really?
<sigh> 'official' accounts?..Really? See, I guess we can do this all day huh?
At least Anyone trying to sell the offical story?
AE911 is trying it's damnest to get rich off the conspiracies
regardless of any given person making $ from selling their books, DVDs
etc..... the facts are what they are and AMERICA has a huge problem here.
Quite frankly, I am shocked at how many people actually buy into the totally
bogus story about airliners being used as weapons.
Why is it bogus?..Why don't you think the airliners were used as weapons?
Total lack of proof of there having been any actual aircraft at any of the 4 crash sites.
+ the fact of the demonizing of people who have the guts to question the official story.
+ the fact that the video of the alleged FLT175 hitting the south tower is an obvious fake.
Where are the airplanes at the Pentagon & Shanksville?
You have got to be joking....Oh ,that's right...You think the plane parts were 'planted'
What 'facts' do you bring that bolsters your claim that the flight 175 video was 'faked'?
As far as demonizing you,you deserve it,bringing this spurious crap to the board.
Believe it or not, lots of people got rich (and richer) off of 9/11 too. Does that bother you too?
- - - Updated - - -
So, you're here to demonize then?
Not especially,but I do if need be.
its a given that the Military Industrial complex has made big bucks
from the disaster that was 9/11/2001, not only that, but the profiteers
who sold tons of high-tech hardware to "homelandsecurity"
in addition to out-fitting "tsa" and all their minions for increased airport security.
and don't forget that in the middle east war that followed 9/11/2001,
there was the total fiasco of mass quantities of CASH paid to contractors
without any sort of accountability at all.
by orders of magnitude, there has been more $ wasted by the forces
of the dark side, than all of the book sales & contributions to AE911TRUTH
Forces of the dark side...lol
You had to knock your response off the rails with that one,huh?
The rest of it,well...
What would you call it?
or are you one of those rose colored glasses
sort of individual who doesn't believe evil exists in the world?
Are you going to write a real rebuttal, or what?
You have yet to actually address the issues that I addressed in my post.
what say U?
Do you twirl a mustache when you speak of the forces of eeeeevil?
I'm surprised my eyes didn't roll out my head.
Do you have a real rebuttal, or do you insist on trying to divert attention away from the facts of this case by posting silly remarks?
That was a rebuttal to your 'forces of evil' comment. It's ridiculous. (As ridiculous as Bush's 'evil doers' comments)
Is this the same ae truth fraudulent non-profit using the fraudulent peer review process by a fraudulent scientist?
Just asking questions.
You charge fraud? on what basis, an article in the "guardian"
you are going to have to do a LOT better than that in order to call fraud
and be taken seriously.
Even if Gage is making $$$ from this, there is a point where people need
to come to the realization that our "leaders" have lied to us, the mainstream media
functions as a PROPAGANDA MACHINE and truly big brother is watching...........
Just because U R
Paranoid .... doesn't mean they are NOT out to get U.
Have a nice day.
One further point should be added here. Even if money is being earned by reporting the truth then, so be it. Money seems to be the catch all/end all for everything anyway so, why not make money generating the truth? I submit that it's certainly not worst thing that has ever happened as a result of profit, by far. God bless them and may the they continue to profit promoting the truth.
Well, when one can admit fraud when and where it exists, regardless of where the chips may fall, I'd say that I would consider them credible. Conversely, when one cries fraud because it goes against the grain of what it is they're trying to promote, while simultaneously defending and accepting blatant lies, I'd say one might ought to refrain from throwing around the term 'fraud' at the outset. Wouldn't you agree?
May I add that CNN, ( etc .... ) makes $$$! from broadcasting what is alleged to be truth
but in fact is propaganda. and they are making big money from their efforts, does anyone
have a complaint about how the mainstream media does their job?
CNN is a joke and a nothing more than a bad SNL parody of 'news' these days (almost as bad as FOX). Propaganda geared at keeping the dumbed down masses dumb (certainly little 'news' content). I suggest AlJazeera network for actual news (as far as the boob tube goes anyway).
Separate names with a comma.