Ya, that came and went pretty quickly, no discussion though. That is what it is, you know. It's Official and it's about a Conspiracy Theory. What about your constant use of the idiotic term "troofer"? Hypocrite much? Me too. They are after all hiding thousands of documents/pieces of evidence. They also made sure to destroy as much of it as possible. Absolutely agree. However, one still has to take into consideration that we are being told that something that has never happened before happened 3 times in the same day and at the same general location, hours apart. You don't mind if many of us find it extremely difficult to swallow, do you? Or are you that much of a hater that you feel compelled to use name calling when referring to those who haven't bought the government fairy tale? I don't have any for you, I swear. You'll just have to do the research if you really care. I'm not sure why you're asking for it anyway, aren't you 100% convinced about what you've been told?
No, it's still BS. The towers collapsed at approx. two thirds of the rate of free fall and for 7WTC, free fall was only noted at the 12.5 second mark for 2.25 seconds. Truther memes are wrong. I hope that clears up your confusion. Get back to me if you have any technical questions on the subject, especially 7WTC.
That's only what I've been saying forever. 9/11 truth has no evidence for its crazy stories. I knew that and Shinebox knew that. Finally, an admission to the lies and fraudulent claims of 9/11 truth. LOLOL, and there it is. 9/11 truthers aren't smarter than everybody else. 9/11 truthers don't have a higher IQ than anybody else. 9/11 truthers aren't better researchers than anybody else. 9/11 truthers just have internet access.
Not an ad hom, just a statement of the simple truth. One cannot engage in rational public dialogue with a person in denial of facts.
More silly rhetoric. Remember, you're the guy that doesn't believe in any source material posted and you swallow the nukes fairy tale. Any judgement made by such a 'thinker' is questionable.
More than can be listed here, probably. The big ones are molten iron and the presence of airplanes, or not, in certain locations.
I got another weird one for you... How about that being isn't just simply evil to the core but........ knew that The Ancient of Days the Father needed to test humans somehow so...... Perhaps Lucifer / Loki / Iblis / Satan.... is really more like Stanley Milgram Ph. D. and is testing each of us in ways that will show our true nature? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milgram_experiment
I'll ignore the no-plane nonsense, as that transgresses stupid and runs off screaming into lunatic territory, however, can you explain what the presence of molten METAL (not iron as that can't be determined) means to you and why do you find it suspicious? Please, I'd like a proper answer for a change.
The presence of molten iron (it can be determined indirectly, by the results of the air sampling conducted by DELTA Group) is suspicious because burning office furnishings, the NIST explanation, cannot keep iron in a molten state at all, much less for 90 days. What runs off screaming into lunatic territory is the belief that an airliner was in that field in Pennsylvania when nobody could find one. Delusional territory might better describe it.
The analysis of the supposed flight 93 crash at the 2:19:30 time mark of this video pretty much proves that 9/11 was an inside job. September 11 -- The New Pearl Harbor (FULL) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8DOnAn_PX6M
Please supply the study for scrutiny as I don't believe it. The presence of traces of molten iron in air samples hardly tells us much. And that is just wrong. You need to bone up on the subject a little. - - - Updated - - - Yep, more spamming of Griffin's long debunked nonsense. Do you get paid to do this?
9/11? If buildings' fall don't fit, conspiracy you must admit. If conspiracy a fit, Dancing Mossad I submit. And CIA and Khazarians wrote the script. An American citizen, not US subject.
That's funny. I've never seen it debunked. I've seen people try to obfuscate it and then consider it to be debunked but I've never seen it actually debunked.
Don't you know that the definition of "debunked" is that it appears on anonymous self admitted "debunking sites"? The same sites that focus strictly on attacking anyone and everyone who contradicts/questions the OCT and never, ever questions any aspect of it. It's the exact same characteristics you'll find with many posters engaging in 9/11 discussions.
..even if true. Useless imaginings. Do the physics of collapse. Can the supernatural change physics on that scale? psik
Where would you like to start? You can't just put out a blanket response like that and expect someone to spend a large amount of time on it for free. Be specific.
