Dare I promote an off-the-wall-thought

We have seen ( that is most of us have .... )
these special charts that have circles with lots of colors
and some people can see specific numbers in the arrangement
of colored dots, and some people see either no numbers at all
or a number that indicates partial color-blindness.

Now my thought is, that certain events
such as the events of 9/11/2001
are of such a nature that various people
will see various different things in these events,
and most of us are to some extent color-blind and
can not see the true picture.

Maybe the master architect of this whole thing
isn't really human, but satanic in nature.
So the really true "big Picture" is unavailable to the mortal mind.

or? .... 2 weird?

 

Nothing is "2 weird" when it comes to belief in the supernatural. The only limiting factor is your own imagination.

 

You have of course heard
" Truth is stranger ......... "

 

Yes. I've heard many such platitudes.

 

It is easier to believe in the unbelievable than to face the facts.

 

Believe the unbelievable
such as the story about hijacked airliners being used as weapons?

 

Or that Hitler killed millions of Jews.

 

and that is an uncalledfor shift to this discussion.

The topic at hand is 9/11/2001

 

The thread is actually about conspiracy theorists with a sideline of 9/11. You may not realize that but that is what your thread is about. People that think they see what others don't.

 

I'd just like to ask, are you absolutely certain that you
see what you think you see?

 

You should ask yourself that question.

 

That bit comes with the implication that you are very certain of what you think you see.
but please think about what you think you see, in light of what was presented in science 101.

 

That's what the evidence points to and there is nothing to the contrary. If there were, you would be able to provide it.

 

Well that may be your problem, having never gone beyond science 101 you are unable to understand things like physics.

 

and the "truther" faction produces proof, and you say
OH NO, that is not proof, thank you very much.

 

When,exactly have you done that?


Never.

 

You refuse to look even when proof is offered, in my opinion.

 

Proof has yet to be offered. That's a fact.

 

Because you 'offer' NO PROOF,only opinion

 

point: anybody who did not sleep through science 101
can get this and get it very well, let us not cloud the issue
with requirements for mass quantities of numbers as some
sort of proof. bottom line here, there were no airliners hijacked....
and WTC 1, 2 & 7 were blown up. and no airliner impacted the
PENTAGON.

and either I'm only suited for residence on the "funny farm"
or there is something VERY wrong in AMERICA right now.

 

Tell this to the families of the passengers.

 

Oh!...let me guess the answer to this one...."They're lying!!!"...or..."How do you know they are REALLY missing a family member???"

 

To use the bank theft example,
there is a point at witch the bank manager
knows there is money missing, and indeed
knows how much is missing, however has
yet to name a suspect in the case.

There are the KNOWN KNOWNS
and the KNOWN UNKNOWNS
and of course the UNKNOWN UNKNOWNS
so how is it that we know what we know?

Phenomenology(?)

 

Failed analogy. You have yet to prove the theft happened.

 

Look at the "collapse" of WTC1,2 & 7
look at the alleged airliner crash at the PENTAGON
you say there is no cover-up, what? there is something
very wrong with this picture! 9/11/2001 was NOT the
product of angry Arabs!