~ Do more research. Only two countries allow late term abortion — China and North Korea. Civilized countries do not condone the killing of infants unless the mother's life is in danger . As usual the extremist Democrats killed themselves with their exaggeration and theatrics pushing hostile and unpopular policies . ~ My comment was about your opinion .
My opinion is that abortion is not what you call infanticide. That is YOUR opinionated référence. Please stop talking about abortion after 12 weeks. Neither the article or I mentioned à length of time.
"A government in which a single dictatorial ruler is vested with absolute power." This can never happen here, as long as the right of the People to keep and bear arms remains. Step one to implement such tyranny here is to disarm the People, and there is only one political party who makes doing that a prominent plank in their platform.
This cannot happen anywhere unless the entire military force of the country is involvedcand loyal to the tyranny. Your popguns wouldn't stand à chance. Unless you live inside à Marvel comic book.
Your comment does not reply to my post to which you replied. My use of the word is merely falling into line with the drama queens who threaten tyranny if you don't get to keep your guns. When in fact, you would be completely irrelevant.
I don't engage in your speculation. You make lots of assumptions to arrive at your opinion. The only thing I have to defend is my own assertion that step one to tyranny is to disarm the people, and that only one party makes that a priority.
That is an assumption. There are many ways to prevent tyranny. And many steps to arrive at it. You just can't see outside your box of necessary propaganda. For example, the attempt at armed tyranny on jan 6 was not stopped by firearms. Even though those who attempted tyranny were armed. No one else says they need arms to prevent tyranny. They use law, police and the military. It is called being civilised.
I am not going to sit here and do a "yes I do" "no you dont" double act with you. The closest to tyranny you have come for 200 years was via a right wing deranged président who loved guns and tried to interfère with the democratic Constitutional voting process .He was taken down NOT WITH GUNS. But by law. You can't seriously think that you can stop à government from imposing martial law and invading your private property with your guns! First, this is a government you will have elected unless you think some secret gaggle of people will be able to control the military. Because you will have to establish à police state and control of said military in order to be a tyrant. I find it so astonishing as to be funny that this conspiracy theory is still alive other than to understand that it sounds patriotic in the old school enough to justify having guns. ISTM somewhere you ate the American myth that is identified as heroic patriotism communicated by hollywood and now the media. Look at Ukraine. Do you see pockets of people arming their guns at tanks and missiles and making any difference?? What progress does the man with the gun have against à proper attempt at tyranny? Instead the Ukraine is begging for proper weapons to use against real weapons. Not 18th century weapons. You will never revisit the heroic tales of the foundation of your country...imperfectly understood as it is. So dont give me that reason to keep guns. Chasing off thieves? You are ready to murder someone who tries to steal an INSURED OBJECT and by allowing gun ownership, allows the deranged to slaughter children. Personal and property protection can be achieve in other ways. So please dont tell me about your reasons for having to have guns. None of them stand up other than to feed the NRA corruption that wriggles through your Congress like à poisonous snake. And who have taught you to Believe the Fantasy. And far too many like the romantic fantasy. While small children and innocent people pay for your games with their lives. You live with defending that. I couldn't.
Diverse population? Easy. Find a way to turn the group's against eachother. Perpetuate the systemic racism boogeyman should do the trick!
I asked myself, WWDD? What would Democrat Do? lol. In my defense, i did add, more than simply just a question. Seriously, though, Liberal Statistics have lost a lot of their credibility. I thought that most people new that. But now you know! It's like Liberals praising movies that come out of Hollywood with their reviews. the new york times, the washington post. ABC News. Of course, they're going to say it's the best movie of the year, and good things like that. lol.
do you mean, just like back when Rowe Vs Wade was first implemented, it was also what the American people wanted? lol. no it wasn't back then, and it still isn't. You see, that's how a dictatorship works. Democrat Politicians don't care about We the people. They're going to do what they want regardless.
I'm thirty five. So, ever since I could vote, they've always been insane to me, anyways. lol. demoncrats is right. Demon, and un-Godly Party
You realise that voting these days is a rigged deal. It just gives us that false sense of 'doing the right thing', also a false sense of 'make a change', 'Hear my voice through my vote' rhetoric. If there is an agenda, the right party for the job is always already picked. Just look at what happened 2.5 years ago. The DEMONS got in and everything went pear-shaped. All by design, no random acts happened to make what's going, to occur.
