Dictatorship is the answer

Of course you do. I believe that violence should not be initiated against peaceful people. That is in direct conflict with your desire to be a dictator with an eye on controlling the entire world. It also clashes with your desire to have people executed for ideas that form in their head.

 

So people have no right to protest, and if they do, they should be killed.

Thanks, that's all you had to say in the first place,

 

Bring back dictatorship to the White House. Vote Republican.

 

Ah, the philosopher king! Pure fantasy thought up by philosophers who are pretentious know-it-all's who have become fool's with all their learning.

 

I'm taking this as more of a theoretical question of what would ideally be best. I think probably a dictatorship or an aristocracy would be the best form of government if humans were completely moral and not corrupted by power. These people/person would be the smartest among us and the most moral and could act without having to deal with a Congress that was full of paid for politicians.

 

I'm starting to wonder if peoplevsmedia and Americann are the same person.

 

Besides throwing around your vocabulary skills you fail to make any point.

 

Exactly my point. when people here get disguisted with me even mentioning the idea, it is only because they are quick to associate the word "dictator" with what they have been taught on the media. and while I can agree that dictator is not the right word for a leader, the purpose of this thread was to demonstrate that dictatorship, a HIDDEN dictatorship is what we have in America and most other countries (enslaved by debt) NOW!. that is the purpose of this thread.

 

The best systeme would be a truely democratic one. It is the best form to control any existence of corruption.

 

There are better ways of removing such a hidden dictatorship than hoping that someone ambitious enough to become dictator will suddenly see to everybody's best interest suddenly.

 

Oh, you want a point! Here it is! That is pure Bovine Scatology, the purest progressive leftist loser manufactured manure of all time. Leftists do not appreciate their freedom and liberty and status as individuals. Collectivism and other societal mediocrity is the best they can hope for or desire. Leftists are simpletons.

 

It is true that most people think the word dictator means something that is bad. Part of the reason is the media. I think where you and I disagree is that you think the media is purposely doing it. I think they're just stupid and don't know any better.

 

We could actually vote for someone that has the best interest of the people in mind and is smart. Instead, we vote for Bush and Obama.

 

Sure, "da media" is one reason. Other reasons beings education, knowledge of history, books, capability of rational thought, etc...

 

There has surely been some good autocrats in history, don't you think?

 

Leftists 100% you are right, only problem is I've seen also a lot of RIGHTISTS on welfare and as they call themselves "unemployement"... In other words it is great that you see a pimple on the poop on the left side of the diaper, but if you take a closer look I am sure you would see that there's mess all over the diapers

 

Nope.......

 

Yep. that is where we dissagree, and it is fine to dissagree. when you say they're just stupid you need to understand how fishing works: a worm on a hook is stupid. it is allowed on camera like a reporter, but that worm is controled in much the same way as a reporter. if these reporters become too smart they are fired, because the networks are controled, by special interests. your answer "they're just stupid" does not cut it as far as organized deception.

They also like to show society as stupid, and society likes to watch stupid people for entertainment.

 

Society is stupid.

 

How about Kangxi, Charlemagne, Emperor Taizong, the 5 good Roman Emperors, Asoka, Peter, etc.? I based these more on their economic and cultural influences than military influences. There have been many good emperors or dictators who conquered vast amounts of land, too.

 

How about Kangxi, - Tyrant

Charlemagne, - Tyrant

Emperor Taizong, - Tyrant

the 5 good Roman Emperors, - Tyrants

Asoka, - Tyrant

Peter, - Tyrant

Any other questions?

 

I implore you to take the longer view. Occasionally, humanity faces such dire challenge that the collective decision is to hand off decision making to a small group or individual. The only variable is just where that threshold is reached. In Weimar Germany, all it took was a severe depression.

It might be "off the table" with full stomachs and no gas lines, but it doesn't take much suffering before we look for "The Man on a White Horse".

 

The lives of the people they were ruling were much better at the end of their rule than it was before.

 

All that tells us is that preceding rulers were even (*)(*)(*)(*)tier than the current one. It doesn't make the current ruler a good one.

 

It wasn't better for the people that they killed nor does your simpleton comparative analysis mean that they were "good" emperors.

It would be like one foster parent kicking and punching a child and the next foster parent only kicking the child. That doesn't make the second caretaker "good".