Direct Monthly Payments to Joe Biden from Hunter Biden’s Business Entity

Care to explain the existence of canceled checks? There are also bank records.

 

Nope... talking about your boy the brown stain... and we only need one, but have several.... I'd be happy to go over the rest but will start with just one... holler if you want to be shown how you and your ilk are wrong about the others also....

you continue to start such a misleading and factually incorrect posts... . and once again the corrupt FBI is the agency that has to prosecute the corrupt FBI..
Durham absolutely slays the FBI... but your CNN and WaPo won't go within a country mile of the actual report...
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23813493/durham3.pdf


Treasonous Participation in a failed coup.......

Smells like a "coup" attempt to me.

Chairman Graham Releases Information from DNI Ratcliffe on FBI’s Handling of Crossfire Hurricane
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/pr...liffe-on-fbis-handling-of-crossfire-hurricane

https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/09-29-20_Letter to Sen. Graham_Declassification of FBI's Crossfire Hurricane Investigations_20-00912_U_SIGNED-FINAL.pdf
https://tinyurl.com/5ayc2ky7

 

The premise of your statement is false.

It's not illegal to make money in China. Just ask Ivanka or Trump, who had a checking account in China.

 

Your question assumes illegal activity.

Well, I'm not going to take the premise of assumption as valid.

So,

Produce them. Then, and only then, will we debate the point.

 

they don't upload SC docs until the investigation is finished, apparently.

 

@fullmetaljack
And we had Durham chime in also about a failed coup and failed insurrection, by Obama, Biden and whole intel community, while spying on American citizens and a treasonous failed attempt to overthrow a dule elected president
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23813493/durham3.pdf

 

Comer has shown the connection from China to Joe....
the least you can do is show us the connection to Comer from China.... unless you want to stick to the "loan" nonsense...

 

So, ivanka and trump committed treason. Thank you.

Evidence please

No evidence he was hiding anything.

I doubt it, but, even it that were true, lying is not illegal.

But, if lying really bothered you, you would have contempt for Trump.

And since you love Trump, clearly lying only matters to you if it is a democrat.

they have a word for that, and it's not very nice.

 

Weiss has no indictments..

Let that be your answer.

Without that, your questions are moot.

 

No, he hasn't.

 

Comer did produce them... prove him wrong.... all in black and white

https://oversight.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Fourth-Bank-Records-Memo.pdf

just one of many examples...

 

Let's just take this document. and I'm going to parse it, section by section, and explain to you why it is not evidence.
You'll have to bear with me:

Doesn't matter. It's not evidence of a crime. Besides, claims of lying are exaggerated for partisan purposes.

These are allegations. They haven't been proven.

This is a partisan interpretation of what will be explained in innocent terms when Hunter testifies.
In short, it's an allegation, not a fact.

Allegation, not fact. has yet to be proven.

yeah, Trump has 500 llCs. BFD.

Hunter is not obliged to tell congress of his business in China. He is not an employee of the US Government. The allegation of 'raising serious notional security concerns' is partisan hyperbole. I wouldn't trust Comer in the slightest. .

yes, they keep fishing and maybe one day they will land the fish. Unfortunately, there are no fish in this lake.

So I will assume your other documents or of this extremely piss poor caliber, and not bother with them.,

 

Yea that is how coverups work.... The corrupt DOJ is hiding this..... the dereliction of duty by the DOJ is the give away....
But here is their investigation website... feel free to show us their investigations into the Biden family.... what did they uncover with the national security breach when the VP office sends the son of the VP, and the VP by way of a pseudonym email, the personal phone numbers of many high ranking government official... do you know if the CIA did a risk analysis on this national security breach?

https://vault.fbi.gov/


Please notice it was sent to Hunter and Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov (which is Joe's pseudonyms on e-mails) from the office of the vice president while he was still in office.

National security nightmare of Hunter Biden's abandoned laptop containing phone numbers for the Clintons, Secret Service officers and most of the Obama cabinet plus his sex and drug addictions - all secured by the password Hunter02

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...-security-nightmare-Hunter-Bidens-laptop.html

https://bidenlaptopemails.com/biden-emails/email.php?id=20150607-133904_22008

 

Democrats Know the Evidence Against Bribed Joe Biden Is Solid.

https://archive.ph/wyz2u



Amusingly, dems 'and their allies in the media have been steadfast in their defense of Joe Biden—all while making it plainly obvious that they know he’s guilty as sin and that a full impeachment is inevitable.'

Bribed Joe is the 'titular head of the Democratic Party, they’ve been defending him from accusations of influence peddling and corruption and scoffing at the evidence. Their defense of Biden has evolved over time as new, incontrovertible evidence has been presented.'

A defense of lies, that collapses, followed by a fall back position of lies, that collapses, followed by another fallback to another pack of lies, that collapses. They deserve what they are experiencing.

“If the evidence wasn’t legitimate evidence, they would still be at their very first position,” Rep. Andrew Clyde (R-Ga.) told The Daily Signal in a phone interview this week. “But they are not because the evidence has refuted their position. It’s going to refute their position all the way.”

'They are seeing that the evidence is concrete, it is hard evidence, it is legitimate evidence,” Rep. Clyde said. “It is irrefutable evidence. They are doing everything they can to try to minimize this.”'

'Even the mainstream media, which has long defended Biden, admits that the evidence contradicts Biden’s public denials about his connections to his family foreign business dealings'

'Considering the way the media and the Democrats have moved the goalposts on the Hunter/Joe Biden investigation, it’s quite clear they know the evidence is legitimate.'

'“From the evidence that has come from the Oversight Committee and the Ways and Means Committee and the Judiciary Committee, he [Biden] is leveraging United States tax dollars to enrich him and his family,” he said. "That is bribery, that is extortion.'

And that's not good.

 

@fullmetaljack
@yardmeat
@Patricio Da Silva

Why are you scared of an investigation into Joe Biden and his family? The Democrats set the precedent with all the investigation from before Biden... Why not let Comer do his thing and then when he flops you can rub it in our faces...

PSSSST.... Comer is not done yet... don't shake until you are done peeing...

 

I'm going to explain to you why David Weiss has not indicted Hunter, especially on this one.

1. Origin of the Claim: The allegation that Yelena Baturina wired millions to Hunter Biden was primarily fueled by a report released in September 2020 by Senators Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley. The report claimed that in 2014, Baturina wired $3.5 million to a firm associated with Hunter Biden.
   
   
2. Lack of Direct Evidence Linking Hunter Biden to the Transaction: Investigations into this matter, including media scrutiny and fact-checking, have not found direct evidence that Hunter Biden personally received the $3.5 million or was involved in the transaction. The wire transfer was made to a bank account belonging to an investment firm, Rosemont Seneca Thornton, in which Hunter Biden was not a co-founder or owner.
   
   
3. Hunter Biden's Lawyer's Statement: Hunter Biden's lawyer has stated that Hunter had no interest in, and was not a co-founder of, Rosemont Seneca Thornton, so he did not benefit from this transaction. This statement challenges the direct connection between Baturina's payment and Hunter Biden.
   
   
4. Context of the Business Deal: The payment was reportedly for a consultancy agreement. However, the specifics of the consultancy work, the parties involved, and the nature of the agreement have not been fully disclosed or verified.
   
   
5. Political Context: The allegations gained significant attention in the context of the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, leading to questions about their political motivation and timing.
   
   
6. No Criminal Charges or Official Accusations Against Hunter Biden: Currently there have been no criminal charges or official accusations against Hunter Biden specifically related to this transaction.
   

In conclusion, while the transaction from Yelena Baturina to a firm associated with Hunter Biden raises questions and has been the subject of investigation, there is no conclusive evidence that directly implicates Hunter Biden in receiving or benefiting from the funds. The story, as it stands, lacks direct proof and is mired in political and contextual complexities.

In other words, your claim is bunk.

Devon Archer testified to what Biden said at the meetings. 'pleasantries' 'chit chat'.

No crime.

Sorry.

 

Debunked, see previous rebuttal.

 

The document is a claim, not fact. Here's a fact for you: Hunter Biden had zero interest in Rosemont Seneca Thorton.

 

No crimes are revealed in your documents. Nothing about Joe.

Doing business abroad as a private citizen
though you have a famous dad does not equal 'influence peddling'.

You have to prove it.

I don't have to explain why Hunter and siblings made money. Innocence is the default.

You accuse, YOU prove.

You haven't proven squat.


Fail.

I'm really getting tired of your nonsense, popscott. Off to ignore land, you go.

 

famous people cloak emails. So do I and I'm not even famous.

famous people know famous people.

BFD.


Big deal. '

Yawn.

 

No one is scared, except for those wetting their pants about their inability to provide evidence.

 

You have congress and repubs smearing Hunter, a private citizen, daily, in public, and I think a special case out of fairness that any deposition or hearing involving Hunter should be done in public. The vast majority of folks being depositioned are not subject to public ridicule daily by Congress.

Lowell really isn't anywhere near in the public eye as Trump's lawyers are. So, your claim doesn't ring true.

 

I will agree with Hunter's depositions being made public prior to the open hearings. Do you think Hunter will go for it? I doubt it.

 

Your flailing and have nothing to claim. Typical liberal cheap talk with no rebuttal.

 

No really... Why are you scared of an investigation into Joe Biden and his family? Why do you put up such a fuss when it is just normal everyday thing since Trump road down the escalator with his beautiful wife?