Do you support eugenics?

I support eugenics.

I think most of the masses are too dumb, while most of the elite are too wicked.

This creates horrible consequences for Humanity.

The only way I think to combat this is to apply eugenics, because so much has been thrown money wise to educate people, and they're still usually painfully dumb, and I think the elite are just more likely to be wicked, because they're more likely to be power crazed, greedy psychopaths.

I think these societal problems can get better with environment, but the real solution is to apply eugenics.

 

Another racist thread?

 

More like a misanthropic thread, nothing racist was written in this thread's OP.

But, people looking for racism everywhere, and profusely going nuts over racism, kind of prove my point though, about the masses being painfully stupid. LOL

 

I think swift executions of people who murder, violently rape or steal(grand theft or greater) would solve many of our DNA problems. No buying your way out either. A banker who steals millions should be executed right along side a scumbag who steals a car.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I think Hitler would agree with you OP.

 

The Communists, and the Capitalists killed way more people than Hitler did, but there's not a knee JERK reaction to those, like there are to Nazism, how come?

Nazis actually had a lot of good ideas, they just went too nuts.

But, the same can be said about the Capitalist British Empire, or the Communist Soviet Union who killed 10's of millions.

Besides, in WW1 Germany was wicked too, even though they weren't Nazis, when they used poison gases against other Europeans they fought too.

So, is it really a Nazi thing, or a German thing?

 

Yes, stupid people shouldn't breed. At least we should stop subsidizing stupid people to breed.

 

Some on this very thread

 

I think if people with lower IQ scores, SAT scores, PISA scores etc.
or a criminal background have kids, they should be taxed through the roof for it.

I also think if people with higher IQ scores, SAT scores, PISA scores etc.
or a non-criminal background have kids, they should receive tax benefits for it.

I call this peaceful eugenics.

I think it's great, it would be a great way to improve society over generations, without being immoral.

But, I'm sure many Liberals would screech about that, as would some Christian bible nuts who think it's against God's will.

But, personally I don't care about that, our aim should be to improve society, not what we have now, where society is wrecked, by the reckless.

 

So each person would be tested and if certain blacks and Hispanics score high and certain poles score low then you would be ok with this

 

You, Margaret Sanger, Hillary, Planned Parenthood and the Progressive Socialist KKK.....

 

Sure, why not?

 

Depends where you set the score. Set it high enough and only jews and Asian americans would get the benefit

 

Eugenics would be progressive.

Liberalism which caters to giving hand outs to lower IQ people to have more kids would be regressive.

I for one think Humanity could be much better than it is, why shouldn't we aim for that?

Obviously environment isn't going to solve it, because the environment is pretty good, and there's still lots of dopes, and degenerates, but also lots of intelligent, and peaceful people.

Why the disparity?

The clear answer is genetics.

- - - Updated - - -

As if there's no high IQ, law aiding White people?

 

It assumes IQ is the only quality to promote which is false

 

You left out Polish Americans who scored a 109 IQ.

 

Most are rocks

 

Um, what?

I listed criminality, PISA scores, SAT scores, and IQ scores.

That's clearly multi-dimensional, and not only based on IQ scores.

- - - Updated - - -

Poland also scores one of the highest PISA scores in Europe today.
(That's with less resources)

Hate to break it to you, but Polish are quite intelligent people.

 

No,here's why and this is an example of Eugenics:
http://www.ncas.rutgers.edu/center-...tion-and-human-rights/nazi-euthanasia-program

Sick,sick stuff.
Sounds like you would have made a good Nazi,Polish-American man.

 

They only test intelligence not artistic ability, creativity, strength, social ability, entrepreneurship, inventiveness, compassion or beauty

- - - Updated - - -

I demand a retest.

 

There is some value to this idea; the premise of idiocracy is absolutely true: dumbasses vastly outbreed intelligent people, resulting in reverse evolution. In a sense, eugenics is already happening for the bad, since people with no business having kids (because they are already failing at their own lives) are being subsidized to have them. I oppose the "criminal background" restriction, though. That says more about the legal structure of the society one lives in than it does about an individual's intelligence (a political dissident in North Korea will most likely have a "criminal" record, for instance).

 

Eugenics just aims to improve genetic quality, has nothing to do with murder, although like any philosophy can include murder.

Look at how many Communists killed in the name of equality, or Capitalists killed in the name of greed.
(I suppose that's okay though)

A lot of posters here, are kind of proving my point to why we should promote eugenics actually. LOL

 

The PISA scores of Poland have been tested for awhile, and moved up from average, to some what high, to now high.

Which makes a lot of sense, considering Poland's grown in it's resources for education, as it's resources have grown.

Oh, and the IQ of Poland at 99 was the highest in the Soviet bloc, even beating East Germany with a 95 IQ.

I don't really know where you get such nonsense from?

- - - Updated - - -

Instead of eugenics, we have dysgenics.

 

Again IQ is not even the most important factor in success. I have met some brilliant bartenders

 

WTF?

A bartender can have a high IQ.

But, on the whole high IQ people are more successful, they tend to be better workers, and tend to think before they act.