Do you trust the US government ?

Discussion in '9/11' started by PPP, Feb 24, 2013.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    oops,major blunder there by the government in their coverup.hahahahahahahahahaaaa
     
  2. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    You're most definitely the king of the reach-around in this forum.
     
  3. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,508
    Likes Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    63
    well sound advise but the day he follows it, is the day I become president of the united states.hee hee
     
  4. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    where's the funny? You always end your asinine posts with a lol or hehe which are so out of place based on the context. Are you like this when you speak to someone in person?
     
  5. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well, NIST is not a report, either. Want to try again?
     
  6. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0



    NIST....isn't NIST that government agency that said the fire in WTC7 only had a "small probability" of causing the collapse??
     
  7. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're making that up...
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wrong again, RtWing.
     
  9. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Because the questioner is an obvious twoofer nutjob to be brushed aside like a blowie looking for a place to lay eggs.
     
  10. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You lose credibility every timme you post that. It demonstrates that you have not read any of the reports that did not come out of some Nazi fool's underwear. The engine was damaged on the way into the target striking a light pole.
     
  11. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh wait.....that was in the official "commission" report. My apologies.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No problem. It's rare that you get a claim correct.
     
  13. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    Thanks man. I knew YOU would understand that.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You're welcome.
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,259
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    (from post #160)
    Leftysergeant is misrepresenting his original statement to mislead those who don't acutally look at what he said. Here's the link to what he said.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-11.html#post1062370641

    Anyone who reads what you really said will know that you don't even believe your own arguments.
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have yet to show why I shouldn't. Let's see YOUR science.
     
  17. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I did not say that it was normal jet exhaust. I said that it was normal in the context of emissions from a damaged engine. Notice that I have stated several times that I base this on my experience watching aircraft with damaged engines landing on several occassions, and from observing smoke emitters at air shows. <<<mod edit/off topic>>>
     
  18. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,259
    Likes Received:
    843
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Everybody please actually click on the link and see what leftysergeant really said.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-11.html#post1062370641

    He's misrepresenting what happened to mislead those viewers who don't take the time to click on the link and look at what he said.
     
  19. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It has been known almost from the day after the attack that the plane was trailing smoke after it hit the light poles. I should not have had to include that every time that I post anything regarding the smoke trail.

    Further, it is obvious from the shot from the other camera that it was a smoke trail. That was why some idiots saw a missile.

    But it was not smoke from a missile. Smoke from a missile is not swirled about in the vortex that forms under the wings of an aircraft. It expands in all directions.

    <<<mod edit/flame bait>>>
     
  20. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    and what does your professional experience tell you about what would happen to a wing when hits a pole at 300 knots?
     
  21. leftysergeant

    leftysergeant New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2012
    Messages:
    8,827
    Likes Received:
    60
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Same thing that happens to a Kenworth when it hits a light pole at 50mph. The pole snaps off at ground level the way they are designed and the Kenworth continues on with some structural damage. DERP!
     
  22. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    The same thing that happens to a hot knife when it goes through butter.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,470
    Likes Received:
    1,721
    Trophy Points:
    113
    finally you guys got one right.

    nothing happens to the knife and the butter is sliced into 2 pieces
     
  24. gabriel1

    gabriel1 New Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2012
    Messages:
    3,789
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I don't believe you can actually guard a parameter with a wire fence
     
  25. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If goes on unimpeded, successfully slicing through many more poles without hitting any part of the ground, still able to hover just above the grass top, and then disappear never to be seen again? Poles fall down that aren't actually in the supposed flight path? Oooooh...wait....I know, I know. It keeps going right on through concrete and steel, and then evaporates?
     

Share This Page