Donald Trump’s alleged ‘sexual proclivities’ graphically detailed in new Epstein documents

https://news.yahoo.com/donald-trump-alleged-sexual-proclivities202228651.html?fr=yhssrp_catchall

This is a pretty shocking release and I think a more thorough investigation needs to take place. This is a presidential candidate so I believe no stone should be left unturned. Perhaps in the next couple of days we will learn additional details about Trump's relationship and role in Epstein's cabal.

 

Only two things are really of interest.

1. Was he married at the time.

2. What were the ages of his sexual companions provided by Epstein.

 

Ahh yes more allegations without evidence. The democrat MO lol.

 

If only it wasn't second hand information.

But yeah, please, investigate. I encourage it. Talk to the original girl about it.

 

years of the right blaming Clinton.... and now looks like more evidence for Trump may b showing up

 

Firstly let’s brace ourselves for massive “whataboutisms”. There will be a resurgence of “but Clinton” and “Biden sniffs kids” bunkum.

But…underpinning this is a story that has lain dormant for too long

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/assault-allegations-donald-trump-recapped
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863
So, why did “Katie Johnson” drop her lawsuit? Seems she got a lot of death threats

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-poli...-13-year-old-lawsuit-katie-johnson-allegation

At the time even the “liberal media” was questioning her veracity

 

I've always wondered if Trump settled this right before she was scheduled to do her presser with her lawyer Lisa Bloom?
A no-show days before the Nov.8,2016 Presidential election.

Trump was dealing with the release of the "Hollywood Access" tape and had just paid off Stormy Daniels the end of Oct 2016.

Here's Ransome's deposition in the Virginia Guifee/Roberts lawsuit against Maxwell.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23453527-de-701-1-sarah-ransome-depo

 

Oh! I have no doubt Trump first organised/suggested someone made threats to her - she certainly was not the only woman who said she was intimidated on that long list of women who came forward to say he had assaulted them. I am also sure he slapped her with an NDA but he may be in trouble there too. His NDAs have just been successfully challenged and proven to not be worth the paper they were printed on. https://www.forbes.com/sites/alison...s-court-finalizes-settlement/?sh=362045d13a6b
Interestingly I stumbled over this

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-do-papers-allege-trump-epstein-took-part-sexual-assault-1857863

I am pretty sure there is more than one journalist who is out hunting this girl and I truly truly hope that she gets justice

 

It works in a court of law.

 

Of course Agent orange partook. Anyone that doubts this is still myred in denial. Whether the girls were of legal age or not is unclear.

 

it doesn't matter

accusations against non-Democrats are now viewed as factual.

 

Serious question — if it comes from a first hand account do you believe it will cost him a single voter?

I don’t

Short of video evidence I think his magapatriots will explain anything that happens to him as a conspiracy, even if it matches his record.

This guy frequently was accused of walking in on young girls, during pageants and concerts by numerous people, and not a single one of you care. Numerous rape accusations and one proven in court. Major instances of infidelity and prostitution.

Zero issues for the “christian” right

 

Like I said — it’s a trend and this trend looks like it crosses more than one path with Epstein.

But the people that doesn't care that he walked in on naked women in their dressing rooms won’t care about the trends here either.

 

He allegedly had sex with one of Epstein's girls.
That’s the issue.

The ones of age were basically prostitutes and the minors were… minors

 

If she was a minor, obviously that's completely wrong and illegal.

 

I am not aware of her age at the time so I am assuming she was of age until evidence is given in the other direction.

Do you not think it speaks to the moral character of someone who engages in constant adultery, prostitution and peeping?

 

Sure, I think that's a fair statement. I don't think the "peeping" is as big as a deal as people make it out. If you ever attend a fashion show, runway show, any type of pageant you are going to see these things. I think adultery is terrible though, and Trump doesn't escape that scrutiny.

 

So all the evidence now pouring out about clintons..... never mind you don't care about what he/she did....

 

There is a big difference between staff seeing those things and a person that has no business being in private dressing rooms wandering in to perv on women. It’s a private space and those women expressed discomfort.

It’s the same reason I don’t support trans people in female locker rooms. Why are your views different?

 

Our positions have always been the same.
If they did something illegal then lock them up.
If they did something immoral don’t vote for them.

Magapatriots are the ones that only seem concerned when there is a (D) beside their name.

 

Trump is the owner - literally the head of staff in that scenario. It's like an owner coming down into the football locker room.

 

It will surprise you that I don't doubt any of this at all. The things he's said about his own daughter, his flesh and blood are things people don't normally say. Even for example, those who have incest as a sexual fantasy they don't actually share that fantasy. Trump's sexual perversions are well known, so it wouldn't shock me if in fact he took part in Epstein's escapades.

 

So you would be ok with the male owner of a gym constantly walking through the locker room and sauna areas to see naked underage girls and women?

 

Not the same context. If that gym is about to host a "body building" contest with television and advertising, would I be ok with the owner if the gym and the host of the contest checking on the contestants? Sure, why not? Seems like the prudent thing to do if you depend on said event to generate income. No different than a grocery store owner checking on his product prior to opening.

 

We will just have to disagree then.

His actions taken into account with the accusations against him as well as his other words show a disturbing trend. That none of his supporters can see it — or more likely just don’t care — says a tremendous amount about their character.