Doritos Offers New Chips to Support Homosexual Lifestyle

Oh I see, so as called....it was only trying to squeeze in your pet group into an institution they never belonged in. Sounded better when you rewrote it to "Marriage Equality".

 

Simple, remove government from marriage, no tax breaks, financial incentives, legal protections.... But then you will not be able to limit churches STILL marrying homosexuals so your end goal is still not reached.

If consenting adults want to sign a contract they should be free to do so.

 

Making it legal for two gays to marry is "shoving it down your throat"? Well divorce is legal so it's already being shoved down your throat using your logic and you give it lip service instead. You've proven your hypocrisy.

 

A man made "institution they never belonged in". Marriage has been redefined hundreds of times, the same could have been said about interracial couples.

And yes, we as humans create buzz words to advance deeply held causes. Also see civil rights movement, gender equality (just for white women at the time). Take offense with those?

 

it would be hypocracy if I wasn't concerned with divorce. You not seeing my disapproval of divorce does not mena it's lipservice. It just means you only choose to focus on stuff that affects you and your ability to gay-marry and nothing more. Tunnel-vision.

so why do you not support siblings to marry, legally? Seems your demand for equality stops after you get yours

 

Never once to this degree. This one is a mockery.


Civil rights and gender equality were valid....Gay is not, sorry. Being a Female, or of a Different Skin color are immutable characteristics. Gay is a behavior and belongs nowhere near those causes.

Gay is on par with smoking, an unhealthy choice that some find pleasure in and choose to do.

 

Really so where have you fought for divorce to be banned like you have SSM?

And as for siblings being able to married it is clear you don't bother to read anything anyway so I will repeat again. I have no problem with it. The only relationships that I have a problem with are between mother/son, father/daughter and any other combination because last studies have shown those relationships to be harmful to the daughter, son. If you have any studies that show otherwise please let us know and I will reconsider those ones.

So the only hypocrisy is still from you.

- - - Updated - - -

Good thing your opinion is irrelevant and SSM is legal isn't it?

 

I'm sure they would, but it keeps getting shoved in their faces...look at the title of the thread.

 

It certainly is unfortunately, however USSC rulings arent always the final word as Im sure you know. I'm hoping sanity takes another look at this one in the future.

 

Really? You are being forced to buy Doritos? You'll have to show where. Why do you hate capitalism so much?

- - - Updated - - -

Yeah I'm sure those that were against interracial marriage were saying the same thing. I wouldn't hold your breath, but hey if you turn blue and pass out it will at least be funny.

 

for all you know, yes.... but again, it's not in your tunnel vision, so you haven't paid attention.

- - - Updated - - -

on par with another minority group who wants to marry for love, but are currently unable to.....

#polygomy
#incest

 

So first you try to distract and call me a hypocrite and then when I prove you wrong, you accuse me of having tunnel vision. Do you have proof on anything or will you continue to spout off BS. You cannot refute the fact that conservatives as a whole do not fight to make divorce banned like they have with SSM. Therefore hypocrisy proven. Elrathin-3 JavisBeacon - 0. This score brought to you by the hypocrisy of conservatives in regards to SSM and divorce.

 

Yawn.

The ole Race= Behavior canard.

 

you have no idea if conservatives support divorce. Even the ones that have can still not support it. Past sins sorta thing. You are simply trying to distract so you don't have to face your own hypocracies that you can't rationalize in your own head.

That you demand "Marraige equality" (but not for everyone)

You can't really call your movement "equality" when you don't want to include everyone.

See, you and I aren't much different.... we both have a pretty specific definition of what marriage should be. My line in the sand is right after heterosexual marriage, and doesn't include you or your boyfriend.... your definition includes you and your boyfriend, but doesn't include siblings marrying.

the only thing different is where we draw our arbitrary line of morality.

I get mine from my faith
you get yours based on how many likes you get on social media when you show support

"I support marriage equality" gets a gazillion likes, therefore, you support it
"Marriage equality should also include siblings marrying...." doesn't get you as many likes.


but keep focusing on the high divorce rate that Conservative Christians don't support, as your defelction... lol

 

Opponents of interracial marriage believed their arguments were valid.
So now you are asserting that homosexuality is an addiction? Do you know any smokers that were addicted to smoking before their first cigarette? Most gay people I assume realize they are gay long before their first "behavior".

 

Not to mention that it doesnt have any upside for society, like perpetuating the human species.

 

Nope simply pointing out that both those against SSM and interracial marriage have something in common. Neither got what they want.

- - - Updated - - -

So gay people don't do anything for society? Pretty arrogant of you to think that considering that many are doctors, fire fighters, police, military, etc. How about this, you tell us what makes you so better?

 

But purifying he white race isnt a legitimate governmental interest while improving the wellbeing of children that only heterosexual couples produce is a legitimate interest.

 

Gay sex doesnt do anything for society. Has the same impact as my relation with my left hand. None whatsoever.

 

You're ASSuming that gay people cannot raise children successfully. You would be wrong in that ASSumption. Why do you hate children so much?

 

For starters, straight couples can have intercourse and continue their bloodline. Two gay men or women can't.

 

How has drinking alcohol or smoking done anything for society? How has many other things. Does something have to have a positive impact to be legal?

What have YOU done for society that you think your better than gay people?

- - - Updated - - -

So that makes them second class citizens because of that? Old people can't either in many cases, are you going around telling them they can't marry? What about infertile people?

What makes YOU better than any of those other people?

 

Why are you and so many people on the left always so concerned about interracial marriage?

 

Making a comparison is hardly "concerned" Why are you and so many on the right always uneasy about being compared to those against interracial marriage? Is it because you both are wrong?

 

Old people and infertile people stand a much more significant chance of reproducing than a gay couple. Don't hate on me for stating facts pal. I've got four boys that are carrying on my bloodline. Do you understand that a gay can't carry on his bloodline and that bloodline dies out with you? I suppose that's not a bad thing, but had it been a fad a couple of centuries ago, half of y'all wouldn't even be here. But hey, what lefty looks ahead at the future anyways? At this rate, Conservatives will be well in control in another generation or two. That's very good news for my children and grandchildren.