Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

As explained by the partisan lens of Lesh..... Of course folks like the Sierra Club, the enviro Nazis over at Green Peace et al had notta to do with it....

 

Prove that it has not.... Prove you can demonstrate the global impact of an increase of 2 hundredths of a degree F.

 

Impressive, I must say. Not one thing you just said is true. You wrote four paragraphs of falsehoods. It's all bullshit.

 

MBH98 and MBH99 have been shown to be dishonest junk science.

 

It is immoral to implement policies which raise the price of energy for no significant effect on temperature. That's a moral issues and not a political issue.

 

I am not seeing your point.... Because I don't support conspiracies about AGW I don't buy light bulbs? Try to stay on topic.

 

You demand proof of a negative?

Why do you even post?

 

I keep hearing this. Tell us how much it will raise the price of energy please. And use a source not related to the fossil fuel industry please

 

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/527196/how-much-will-it-cost-to-solve-climate-change/

That's MIT

The cost is negligible...unless we delay. THAT will add significant costs

 

Don Esterbrook is a well known climate denier, and has shilled for oil industry financed global warming denial orgainizations. He is also known to inflate both his resume and the accuracy of his findings.

 

The reality is that global warming is net beneficial for the next 3 deg C above the temp in the year 2000. Global warming is a positive.

 

In Germany the price of electricity is triple that of the US. QED.

 

Easterbrook Derangement Syndrome. Define the term "climate denier" ??

 

Therefore I am too damn smart to look at others opinions?

 

Come'on man - read your own source.

 

I did. And your point is what?

 

In the 70's the fear was global cooling.



http://notrickszone.com/2016/09/13/...ific-consensus/#sthash.pEovmtFu.ACwCBgRr.dpbs

 

A blog! How academic!

 

Couldn't find all the information on Wikipedia for some reason. Any idea why ??

 

That you misrepresent what is said in the link.

 

The simple fact that the climate models have been extremely good instantly refutes that denier whopper. Like all deniers, the stuff you push is just wrong.

 

Don't project.

We understand. You'd lie, cheat and steal for a buck, or for political gain, so you assume everyone else must be as corrupt as you are.

That's not how it works. We are nothing like you.

 

It was mainly deniers in the 1970s pushing global cooling. Kukla and Bryson were both hardcore deniers. Just about everyone else predicted warming.

Your denier cult has been completely wrong about the science for over 40 years now. You were wrong with your ice age predictions in the 1970s. You kept on making those bad ice age predictions for 40 years. Many deniers are still making those ice age predictions, and they're still totally wrong

In contrast, the good climate scientists have been right about everything for the past 40 years. That's why climate science has such credibility, because it has earned it through decades of successful predictions.

If deniers want the same credibility, they need to earn it the same way, through success and hard work. Creating a conspiracy theory about being oppressed is not going to get you any credibility.

 

Climate models have been extremely good?!?!?



Please do cite the climate models, and how they've been 'good'.

 

Not one climate skeptic(realist) has received one penny from any fossil fuel entity on the other hand billions of dollars have been handed out to GLOBAL WARMING proponents in the form of research grants. Please find one statement or piece of data presented by Dr. Easterbrook, Dr. Tim Ball, or Dr. Roy Spencer that can be .refuted. Then provide one ,just one, piece of empirical data that can prove any prediction, hypothesis,or claim put forth by Global Warming Proponents.