You quoted plague311's post (#22) but you responded to my argument. I addressed the issues you raised on this other thread. Most of it is in this post. http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html#post1061951134 There are plausible scenarios that would explain what we're told about the radar, DNA, eyewitnesses, etc. Your attitude that they constitute real proof is pretty lame.