Dismiss Notice
Thanks for being a member of our community. Please donate toward site expenses if you can.

"Equal Rights" is a joke

Discussion in 'Gay & Lesbian Rights' started by MrBaseball, Sep 24, 2011.

Page 6 of 6
  1. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    "Relies"?????

    "Federal district courts dont shoot down supreme court precedent. The"...
    "judge in California didnt even mention Baker v Nelson, let alone shoot it down." Doesnt even need it. Argument remains the same. You are drawn to irrelevancy, like a moth to a flame. Probably to avoid addressing the relevant. Typical.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 14, 2011
    #126
  2. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly... the question is:

    Why did you have to refer to the "...gay judge..." at all?
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 14, 2011
    #127
  3. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm not the one who applied the label. that was you. I'm not drawn to the irrelevant. I'm simply pointing out the bigotry in your posts.
     
    rahl, Oct 14, 2011
    #128
  4. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes it was. And it was you, who was attracted to it like a moth to a flame. I used the term "gay" judge because it led you all to know exactly who I was referring to. And I thought it was referring to them as homos that was bigotry. Gays are just sometimes offended by their own sexuality and resent being identified as "gay".
     
    dixon76710, Oct 15, 2011
    #129
  5. Knuckles

    Knuckles New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Wow I don't think I have ever heard anything farther from the truth. We do not have the right to get married to another man, which is ridiculous. I'm a far right Republican and I support everything a normal Republican supports except when it comes to Gay Marriage. This is the one that I take to heart the most because I can relate to it. It makes me mad when people say well I'm straight and I can't marry a man. Why would you marry a man if you straight? Its Tom Foolery.
     
    Knuckles, Oct 16, 2011
    #130
    Makedde and (deleted member) like this.
  6. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    __Indeed.__
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 16, 2011
    #131
  7. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    For the same reasons a gay man would marry a man.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 16, 2011
    #132
  8. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Why do gay men marry?
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 17, 2011
    #133
  9. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A multitude of different reasons.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 17, 2011
    #134
  10. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    I wonder why some people are so against homosexuals being legally married?

    (Anyone?)
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 17, 2011
    #135
  11. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Because using tax breaks and governmental entitlements to encourage behavior that is beneficial to society is a proper role of government while using them so that those who engage in certain behaviors can feel better about themselves for doing so is NOT a proper role of government.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 17, 2011
    #136
  12. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
    homosexuals marrying has the same benefits that heterosexuals do.
     
    rahl, Oct 17, 2011
    #137
  13. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Encouraging heterosexual couples to marry reduces the # of children born to single mothers and increases the # of children with the benefit of both their mother and father together to provide and care for the child. Homosexual couples produce no children. What benefits were you referring to.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 17, 2011
    #138
  14. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Exactly. There is is no good reason to deny homosexual people the right to be legally married.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 17, 2011
    #139
  15. Johnny-C

    Johnny-C Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2010
    Messages:
    34,039
    Likes Received:
    429
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    Stop promoting a LIE that has already been disproved; it makes no sense to keep repeating it, except to have it sink into the unthinking via repetition.

    Homosexual couples DO have children.
     
    Johnny-C, Oct 17, 2011
    #140
  16. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,847
    Likes Received:
    4,937
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Nope, its a physical impossibility. At most, ONE of the homosexual couple, with a 3rd person of the opposite sex, can produce children. Thats not the homosexual couple producing children. One or both have no involvement whatsoever in the process.
    You are a brilliant demonstration of how detached from reality many of the gay rights advocates have become.
     
    dixon76710, Oct 17, 2011
    #141
  17. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
    rahl, Oct 17, 2011
    #142
  18. rahl

    rahl Banned

    Joined:
    May 31, 2010
    Messages:
    62,508
    Likes Received:
    7,651
    Trophy Points:
    113
     
    rahl, Oct 17, 2011
    #143
Page 6 of 6

Share This Page