Every baby deserves a chance to Live !

Every little child deserves a chance to live, doesn't make any difference whether they're a 3-year old or a developing human being in their mother's womb.
I suspect most pro-choicers actually know this to be true, on some level, but just believe the woman's rights override the chance to have life that the fetus deserves.




Would you agree or disagree with the following statement: "Every baby deserves a chance to live" ?

 

You think that's what? A trick question?


I don't know of anyone who proposes killing babies so why are you even asking that question????

This isn't the Baby Forum, it's the Abortion forum, so no babies are present....


And your photo above is of a baby , a BORN baby...did you confuse it with a fetus? you must not know too much about science and biology and Facts and things like that.....



What exactly do you think a fetus has done that it "deserves" to live..???



Just another "appeal to emotion" juvenile post of the desperate

 

It doesn't have to be outside the womb to be a baby. However much certain abortion supporters would like to think so...

Try clicking on the picture.

I don't know, but I know what the woman's trying to do that makes her not deserve to have the choice.

 

At some level, I suppose pro-lifers know full well that specks aren't people. They just don't want to admit it. After all, if they admit specks aren't people, their whole philosophy collapses.

It's good to be on the rational side. We don't have to pretend to believe something as insane as that.

 

There's a point in time where it's a speck, and there's a point in time after which it isn't.

Just because a human being is much smaller than you does not mean they are not a person. Premature babies much smaller than regular people. So are African pygmies.



No one would say they are any less of a person because of their size.


Look at how small they are:




Click link here to see actual human being who was miscarried at 12 weeks

 

__ click on picture to see a larger frame ___________________________ click on picture to zoom in






Just a "speck" ?

 

they are not a "baby" until they're born. words are supposed to have MEANING. Until it's born, it's a fetus, plain and simple. It's like having your cake. when you eat it, you aint GOT it anymore. It's GONE. When the fetus exits the mother (if it lives) THEN it becomes a baby. Your wishing it was different won't make it so.

 

A baby—even an unborn one—has just as much right to live as the mother does, if not more so.

 

Since every photo you ever posted was either photo shopped or erroneously titled I'll just blow these off as more of your desperation emotional appeal fallacy because you never have facts ...

 

All your photos have proven in the past to be photoshopped or mislabeled.....there is no reason to take them seriously now.

- - - Updated - - -

NO, it doesn't and you have never proven it does.........


Accepted Fugazi's challenge yet?

 

Are you going to adopt these "babies" that the mother doesn't want?

God lets babies die every day.

 

this is a human zygote.



it really doesn't "deserve" anything.

 

this is a human embryo



it too, doesn't "deserve" much.

 

a potentiality is NOT the same thing as an actuality. The pregnant woman IS an actuality. she has rights, the potentiality does not. It really is that simple and again, WHAT biz is it of yours what women do with their own bodies? or men, for that matter (ie, dope)

 

How are they just potentialities?

 

Notice how there's still a lot of abortions performed after 11 weeks.

 

because they are not yet human beings, just potentially so.

 

And they are LEGAL up to 23 weeks.....so what's your point????

 

I voted agree.

 

You can always state why ....but the poll is fake. This is the abortion forum not the baby forum... there are no babies involved in abortion...

 

As has been pointed out, this is an abortion forum so a question about babies would not be relevant. We can all agree that babies have a right to live.

 

IF they're outside of the womb. But not before then, apparently.

 

I'll have to disagree, because I'm trying to legalize baby hunting for sport. The problem with the deadliest game is that adults run too fast, and teenagers are usually better armed than a swat team. Babies on the other hand? Slow, can't hold or shoot a gun worth a damn and will usually just sit there while you pick them off one by one.

(and thus ends my dark sarcasm portion of this thread)

No one will say that a BABY doesn't deserve to live. (unless your an ancient Spartan)

But a zygote and a first trimester fetus? It could go either way, depending on the current situation of the mom. That's the CHOICE part in pro choice.

 

What about a second trimester fetus? Those pictures I posted earlier were of second trimester fetuses, not third. Yes, a fetus doesn't necessarily have to go through the third trimester to come out and survive.
Don't worry, I won't refer to it as a "baby". Even though it may be clasping with its little hand onto mommy's finger.