I love the character..."Maineiac Redneck Yankee"...you should patent that. I've spent time yonder in Rochester and the Finger Lakes, and I didn't meet any rednecks. Are there redneck yankees in the Aderondacks or sumpn'? Nobody is capable of invading the US, nor will our government become evil and turn on us, so a militia isn't neccessary to the security of a free state. The definition of "arms" has been made vague by the gun lobby, so they can make up their own definition. I have guns, and nobody has expressed the intent to come and take them away, and they never will. The 2nd amendment is not threatened by anyone, and fake threats have been created by righties for years out of sheer paranoia
Uhhhh boyeeee,they already DID it after Pearl Harbor,for nothing more than the shape of a persons eyes
That's ridiculous....they didn't round them up for the shape of thier eyes. If they would have done that, they'd have rounded up all the Chinese and Koreans too. They rounded them up because thier potential to be spies was too great. It was obviously a mistake...but if the Japanese tried to use a well regulated militia to stop the government from rounding them up, they'd all be dead.
Here are the issues: 1. Most if not all studies are started with a goal. This goal is what defines the study. 2. Assumptions must not be made yet they are. If I insert a variable (just guessing until I find the proper input) that had not been proven accurate I could have a misleading result. 3. Humans and human behavior can not be used as a variable because it is not consistent. 4. Assigning arbitrary variables to prove a study causes a flawed result. I have read over many of these studies and found many issues that Reiver is so scared to address that he has me on ignore. Funny but I think that depending on studies to do your thinking for you, even when the study is counter to all data, is stupid and shows how closed minded some people are. I mean if the data does not support you make up a study that will.
