Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Discussion in '9/11' started by suede, Sep 28, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do you have any of this evidence in your possession?
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I do. You would be better served by hearing it directly from them, however.

    You have been provided with their contact info. Use it. Don't be lazy or frightened.
     
  3. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sweet! Let's see it. We've only been waiting for evidence like this for 10 long years. :bored:

    Na, from you is fine. I don't want to bother those good people.

    Let's see what you got! I can't wait!! I'm really excited about this!!! :sun:
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No, you've proven that you won't accept evidence from me. You have the means in your posession, go forth and seek the truth.

    If you are sincere, that is.
     
  5. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    But in your original post, you made the assertion that "the very few photos of parts allegedly unearthed were staged".

    So I am just trying to clarify . . . are you asserting that
    A) Flight 93 did not crash there?
    or
    B) Flight 93 did crash there but was not buried?
     
  6. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    DDave, don't you agree that would be the most logical conclusion?
     
  7. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    I'll answer that after you answer my question.

    First, please answer my question . .

    Are you asserting that
    A) Flight 93 did not crash there?
    or
    B) Flight 93 did crash there but was not buried?
     
  8. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    C) Nothing was buried and the few photos of supposed buried debris was staged.
     
  9. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    C was not an option.

    So are you saying by extension of "the few photos of supposed buried debris was staged" that Flight 93 did not crash there?
     
  10. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It is now.

    Not necessarily.

    Now do you agree with my conclusion?
     
  11. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what people say who really don't have any evidence. Say you have it, but never, never show it.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I gave you the info to directly see the evidence yourself. You refuse to look.
     
  13. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Quit trolling. You claim you have this evidence in your possession. Enough of your wild claims. Put up, or shut up.
     
  14. Fangbeer

    Fangbeer Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2011
    Messages:
    11,008
    Likes Received:
    3,931
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Where is your evidence that any evidence at all on site was "staged?"
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well of the measly three pieces of debris supposedly unearthed, here's evidence the black boxes were planted:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9wllcP8QtQ]Back in Black boxes [/ame]
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=52sSMYxGBDw]More evidence 'Flight 93 recorder' photo was staged[/ame]

    And here's evidence that single engine was planted and the story about the other engine changing a bunch of times:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5nRP19-eHP0]The Little Engine That Couldn't[/ame]


    OK, I showed you my evidence. Where's your evidence most of the plane buried?
     
  16. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    How can a plane "not necessarily crash"? Are you proposing that it was shot down?

    You mean this conclusion?

    No, I don't.

    http://www.spiegel.de/international/spiegel/0,1518,265160-5,00.html

    I don't believe the photos were staged. Whether the debris were buried or not is a separate issue.
     
  17. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  18. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's not what I meant.

    Nope.

    What does that article prove about the alleged buried debris?

    Couldn't help giggle about this: "Moreover, there was nothing particularly mysterious about the subsequent handling of the wreckage. For the duration of the investigation, the remains of the jet were placed under an FBI guard."

    Well that's the issue, where was most of that "recovered 95%" of the plane after this supposed crash? It's got to be somewhere, right?
     
  19. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which of it was fabricated?
     
  20. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Nothing but it does establish that eyewitnesses said that there were debris everywhere.

    The logic -- or lack there of. Their facts and assertions don't support their conclusion. It's nothing more than circumstantial evidence, cherry picked facts and assumptions.

    If you find that FBI involvement in the investigation of the crash mysterious, then I am pretty sure that NO evidence would be accepted by you and would be dismissed as faked or just another part of the "conspiracy".

    But I am curious, if you accept the fact that Flight 93 crashed there and was not shot down, what does the fact that no one can prove to your satisfaction that most of it was buried matter? And how does that prove that the debris photos were staged? Would you require photos of enough debris to reconstruct an entire 757? And what source for these photographs would you trust?
     
  21. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Repeated opportunities to present ANY proof of Flight 93 buried. None offered, AGAIN.
    Psssst...that's probably because, guess what...IT WASN'T BURIED, and therefore, THERE ISN'T ANY EVIDENCE TO PRESENT, because, well, IT DOESN'T EXIST!
     
  22. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The evidence for the crash, and the direct source for those who worked the scene have been posted. Numerous times.

    Those truly seeking evidence would stop whining and go to the source.
     
  23. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Okay . . . where is your proof that it wasn't buried?
     
  24. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    well,'evidence' of the black boxes being 'planted,of engine parts being 'planted'.....THAT part,to start with
     
  25. 10aces

    10aces New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2011
    Messages:
    829
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where are the photos of the bouncing engine?

    Lots of photos, but none of the engines, recovery, transportation, etc, etc, etc.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page