I keep looking for this shill I heard about who loiters in airports everywhere. Maybe he's at the bar. You know him?
You're funny. Look for threads started by loopdloop. Last I knew, it was twenty something pages. My response IIRC is on page 18.
Did you get your IP issue resolved yet? No disrespect intended but you don't seem very resourceful for a Marine. If you can't get around it on your Kindle, go to a freakin' public library or Internet cafe for crying out loud.
It's unfreaking believable to me that your IP address has stayed the same for this long. That's not to say that I don't believe YOU, that's just very unusual for an ISP to have their DHCP lease time set that long. I'm guessing you wouldn't have paid extra for a static IP would you? Hell, sometimes my IP address changes 3 times in the same day. Freakin' AT&T DSL drops connection a lot some days. Leaves me a lot of options though should I decide to go back to Let's Troll and poke the bear. Oh, and one of my new accounts just got a "Friend Request" . . . from Phil no less.
I reset my router and modem and cleared my cookies before trying to get on the site...no dice. Still IP banned.
Well, I deal with that stuff for a living. A static IP is one that does not change over time. It always remains the same. Versus a dynamic IP which can change. A dynamic IP from an ISP using DHCP (Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol) may (but not always) change when the lease time expires. A DHCP lease from an ISP is typically short -- like 24 hours. But when you reset a router that is using DHCP the IP from the ISP almost always changes. It could be that they blocked a range of IPs which would be pretty stupid because they could block some of their regular users that way. But they do not strike me as the smartest mods in the world. Go to a local library or Internet cafe and try there.
I'll do it when I can, I promise, but you do realize you are telling me to go out of my way to get back on Let's Roll
what you are REALLY saying... 1) state where he doesnt believe the corrupt hijacked american government 2) name the source where the truth LEAKED out... since corporate media would not let the truth escape 3) you will discredit the source...."not corporate media" THUS.... helping to keep intact the lie told by the corrupt hijacked american government... and re-inforce the notion that only corporate owned medias information is valid.. am i close?
I was thinking about that while I was typing that post. You're right. Never mind. You're better off not going there. Not really. The "sources" which leak out the "truth" usually have no evidence to back up their assertions. Therefore they tend to discredit themselves.
ohhh my bad..... the ol...no evidence source trick... seen it a thousand times.. question when you see information that does not support the official story.... do you keep digging? or do you try to discredit the source to keep the official story intact?
Well, thank you for asking. I keep digging. And I usually find an out of context quote or an out and out lie. Think David Ray Griffen and his "missile batteries around the Pentagon" claim. Now a question for you . . . If a source is caught in a bold faced lie or caught taking quotes out of context, is that unfairly "discrediting the source"?
i have noticed this... sometimes "truthers" are wrong.. out of context quotes and other stuff. but.....at the end of the day... i just dont buy the 15 saudi catching norad off gaurd... looking at where we are today.. wouldnt be possible without 9/11.. after america is dead and gone.. the history books will tell the truth... it was a false flag attack... truthers and debunkers can argue the details... but we ALL know it was a self inflicted false flag attack.
