Ex-CIA chief admits he got spies to write false Hunter Biden laptop letter to 'help Biden'

The one that Hunter will be standing before a judge next Monday being asked, is it your laptop and your financial records and the judge will not accept "it might be". The one that has been verified by the leading MSM news journals and everyone else who has analyzed the contents. The one Hunter has never denied was his and had his attorney attempt to retrieve it as his property. Then sue for release of the information on it.

And this letter that The Big Guy, knowing it was Hunters, used to back up his statement of FACT that the laptop was Russian disinformation in the debate with Trump when Trump brought it up.

 

You're insulting Joe McCarthy.

 

The one that has not always been in his possession? The one that was basically “stolen” from him and given to Rudy Guiliani? The one that Congress has been looking into for months and failed to find anything on?

 

I know. In some Republican circles, that is true.

To give Joe credit, since he named, what was it? … 200 communists in the government, he was bound to be right about a couple of them. Nixon was right about Alger Hiss. The Soviet records confirmed it.

Schiff was like Rev. Dimsdale (sp) in Hawthorne’s The Scarlet Letter. He was obsessed with Trump and Trump only and was dead wrong. Instead of destroying himself, however, he’s alive and well and running for the soon to be vacant Senate seat in California. If course, if Schiff wanted to go after real communists, he’d have loads of them who would freely admit it in the current government. That would take all of the fun out of it for him.

 

Mike Morrell left CIA in 2013. Mike was a regular citizen in 2020. Trump and Trump guys were in CIA in 2020. If you want to blame CIA for Hunter Biden in 2020, look no further then Trump administration.

 

It's like trying to ask your 5 yo to eat broccoli......

 

You literally don't know anything about how government works......

 

It's like these guys never heard of how moles function in the government.

 

You mean Government works like , the guy who left CIA 10 years ago control CIA from outside while CIA director Gina Haspel ( 2020) sit on her a%% and no power to do anything about it. You are right. I didn’t know that is how government works.

 

I just want to clarify this. when you say “Moles”, you mean American patriot who chose to work for CIA rather then making millions in privet sector, who’s only objective is to keep America safe but they are politically liberal and vote Democrat. Are these the people you call “mole”?

I want to clarify, because usually “moles” in CIA are people who spy on behalf of foreign government.

 

I meant what I said. A mole embeds themselves inside of government in order to effect outcomes of the government. You are looking at the term too narrowly and patriotism could be a motivation for hiding deeply inside agencies. However, not all patriotism is good for the country.

 

I do agree with you that not all patriotism is good for the country. Just because someone dress with American Flag and chant USDA , USA, USA and think American Interest is the only thing we should care about doesn’t mean it is good for America.

 

I'm glad you could agree with that point. Even the rioters of 1/6 believed their actions were patriotic, but their actions only did more to cause division in our country. And division is never good for the country.

 

Which ones were HIS guys? Which of the 51 former intelligence officials were HIS guys?

 

Later released classified information especially the Verona Intercepts indeed showed McCarthy was right about the filtration and people he named. Yes he was a bully and full of bluster and wanted the limelight but he wasn't far off the mark.

Far different from Schiff so maybe we should replace McCarthyism with Schiffism.

 

none of the FORMAR 51
but the DIR of CIA in 2020 was Trump's Woman,

 

The one he legally gave up possession on when he failed to return to the shop and pay the store owner for the work performed. The one that has been confirmed to be authentic and to which a judge will ask him next Monday. Congress has not looked at it to find anything on it, we and they already know what is on it and it has been PLENTY.

 

Did he testify that anything in his letter was incorrect?

 

Why should I listen to someone regarding the Constitution when he's proven time and time again that he hasn't read it?