Exclusive: Liz Cheney, January 6 Committee Suppressed Exonerating Evidence Of................

......Trump’s Push For National Guard

Yep we've heard the reports of the evidence they did manage to destroy against the rules and proceedures and this helps explain why the Dems and Rino Cheney are desperate to do so. They know if it ALL was made public their narrative would fall apart.

Cheney and her committee falsely claimed they had ‘no evidence’ to support Trump officials’ claims the White House had asked for 10,000 National Guard troops.

....an early transcribed interview conducted by the committee included precisely that evidence from a key source. The interview, which Cheney attended and personally participated in, was suppressed from public release until now.

Deputy Chief of Staff Anthony Ornato’s first transcribed interview with the committee was conducted on January 28, 2022. In it, he told Cheney and her investigators that he overheard White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows push Washington D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser to request as many National Guard troops as she needed to protect the city.

He also testified President Trump had suggested 10,000 would be needed to keep the peace at the public rallies and protests scheduled for January 6, 2021. Ornato also described White House frustration with Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller’s slow deployment of assistance on the afternoon of January 6, 2021....

...“The former J6 Select Committee apparently withheld Mr. Ornato’s critical witness testimony from the American people because it contradicted their pre-determined narrative. Mr. Ornato’s testimony proves what Mr. Meadows has said all along: President Trump did in fact offer 10,000 National Guard troops to secure the U.S. Capitol, which was turned down,” said the Georgia Republican.
https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/0...g-evidence-of-trumps-push-for-national-guard/

More quotes from the transcript

“..Meadows wanted to know if she need any more guardsmen.............And I remember the number 10,000 coming up of, you know, ‘The president wants to make sure that you have enough.’ You know, ‘He is willing to ask for 10,000.’ I remember that number. Now that you said it, it reminded me of it. And that she was all set. She had, I think it was like 350 or so for intersection control, and those types of things not in the law enforcement capacity at the time.”

And those 350, in her letter specifically turning down any additional troops she said of the 350

"“No DCNG personnel shall be armed during this mission, and at no time, will DCNG personnel or assets be engaged in domestic surveillance, searches, or seizures of US persons,”"

They were ONLY to be blocks away directing traffic.

And even with the letter the WH directed forces be on alert and in a quick reaction force but that was not possible without the call to bring them and as they found out when after the riot had already started the the Mayor and Capitol Police FINALLY make their request they troops had to called into their armories, equipped to go, loaded up given their orders and then drive to the Capitol all of which took time.

As the Chief of the Capitol Hill Police at the time has testified and written in his book had those calls from the WH to have those troops there the riot would never have happened and the Capitol would never have been breeched.

They promised complete transparency but not only have surpressed evidence being release have actually engaged in it's destruction so we the people will not find out the TRUE story.

J6 Committee failed to preserve records, has no data on Capitol Hill security failures, GOP charges
The J6 Select Committee disbanded in December 2022 and was required to preserve documents from its investigation

The House select committee that investigated the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021 failed to adequately preserve documents, data and video depositions – including communications it had with the Biden White House that are still missing – according to the Republican lawmaker overseeing the GOP investigation into the committee's work.

The now-disbanded "J6" committee, which was run by Democrats and included only two GOP members, has also failed to provide any evidence that it looked into Capitol Hill security failures on the day of the riot, Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight for the Committee on House Administration, told Fox News Digital.

Loudermilk said his staff has had difficulty gathering all the information it needs to investigate Rep. Bennie Thompson’s handling of the J6 investigation.

"Part of our task as this oversight subcommittee is to actually address the security failures, look into how did it happen… how were these folks able to get into the Capitol," Loudermilk said. He said the documents they obtained came over in boxes and was completely unorganized.

"Nothing was indexed. There was no table of contents index. Usually when you conduct this level of investigation, you use a database system and everything is digitized, indexed. We got nothing like that. We just got raw data," he said. "So it took us a long time going through it and one thing I started realizing is we don't have anything much at all from the Blue Team."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/j6...on-capitol-hill-security-failures-gop-charges

 

Which is the bigger and more harmful inside job? 911 or J6?

 

Now we know...lol

 

So trump knew his rally would turn violent and chose to hold it anyway. And this is supposed to exonerate him??!

 

So trump told his angry mob to March on the Capitol when he knew there wasn’t enough security?
And this is supposed to exonerate him?

 

So republicans are calling the people arrested hostages, when they are so dangerous we needed 10k armed soldiers to stop them?
And this is supposed to exonerate him?

 

There were going to be tens of thousands there it was no unusual to have NG troops on had when crowds of that size were expected and they had already seen the opposition come and engage in violence against Trump/conservative rallies READ THE LINK.

 

The Capital Security said they had it under control.

 

Of the claims he could have and should have prevented it with more security and he was responsible for the security failure which allowed the riot to occur AT ALL, yes. That he was planning to overthrow the government when in fact he was urging MORE security that day to prevent any groups from getting out of hand and rioting let alone taking over the government, yes.

 

Trump never ordered 10,000 National Guardsmen deployed to Capitol Hill.

I find it totally ironic that you claim Trump wanted to protect institutions from his own supporters.

That is so ridiculous.

Trump is the person most directly responsible for this riot.

 

So when they said no why didn’t he cancel it? Why send them to March on the Capitol?

 

Didn’t they? I heard it was just a friendly tour and the cops let them in

 

If he thought there wasn’t enough security then why sick them on the Capitol itself?

 

At least as far as the idea that he 'let it happen', he certainly gave an effort to prevent the incident from happening. But it turns out, incompetence prevailed that day and as a result, the lax security.

But more importantly, Cheney and the Star Chamber were required to preserve evidence and did not. What was that called again? Obstruction of Justice? If justice is equal, the courts should demand the evidence to be overturned to the Republican Committee.

 

If he wanted to prevent it he wouldn’t have told them to March on the Capitol after his speech.

 

You didn't read did you? The reason Trump wanted that many is because he thought there would be counter protests and there would be mass fighting between the groups. Please read before you comment.

 

By the way I told EVERYONE this was happening. Multiples of times on here.

Chris Miller gave testimony in 2021 that Trump did ask for 10,000 and I told everyone who would listen that the J6 committee was covering up that exonerating information.

 

Bullshit. He told them that the election was being stolen from them and that they needed to fight, right before sending his seditious mob to the Capitol to stop the lawful process of certifying the election.
How the hell can you people still be trying to polish this turd?
All your talk about personal responsibility is a sham.

 

"Tell Trump 'No, we aren't going to provide security' and maybe then he will cancel the protest, and if he doesn't and anything goes wrong we can blame him. This is what's known as a win/win."

 

Let Trump win again and you will see real violence.

The riots all over the country on his inauguration day will seem like child's Play.

Little Democrat commy thugs will do their best to burn this country down.

 

I Seriously DOUBT that...
BUT, IF that really IS the case....
It sounds like a great reason to vote against Trimp...
Potential problem averted....

 

No,

The event was his event. He wanted it, His henchmen planned it. He began promoting the idea even before the election.

At no point did he ever order out the National Guard.

He wanted lax security. And he installed “actings” in key roles in DoD (an attempted to install one as Attorney General)., in order to sow chaos and confusion.

 

This begs the obvious question.

Why would anyone say that Trump “asked” for or suggested 10,000 NG troops, when he was the only person in the District of Columbia who had to authority to order them out.

Which he refused to do, even as his mob ran wild in the Capitol building. Instead, he watched the whole thing on Fox Noise, grinning the whole time and wondering why everyone else was upset.

The part about “frustration over “acting” DoD head Christopher Miller’s slow deployment is equally dishonest.

Trump had only recently installed Miller. His purpose was to cause bureaucratic delay and throw wrenches in any attempt to respond quickly on the day of.

And, of course, the ridiculous narrative ignores the fact that Trump had the authority to give the orders, not Miller.

This is an obvious talking points piece, designed specifically to recycle old excuses, and to try and entertain Trump’s base with another recycling of the old lies.

 

And, dispite all the noise in this Federalist piece, Trump NEVER exercised his SOLE authority to call out the DC National Guard.

 

“Asked for” but never ordered.

Why would Trump ask, when he was the only one with the authority to give the order. Miller did not have the authority to order out the DC National Guard. Trump did.