F.B.I. Raids Office of Trump’s Longtime Lawyer Michael Cohen

Trump's weeks are getting harder. I'm really surprised he hasn't just resigned.
A coupe of sex scandals.
His personal lawyer under investigation that includes the President.
A Russian investigation that includes obstruction of justice.
Lost lawyers.
A failure to change the subject by bombing a sovereign country.
Going mushy on NK.
Facing a trade war of his making.
A former FBI director that fails to be intimidated getting more air time.
Even the school kids are mad at him.
Good thing he doesn't have a dog.

 

Let’s Apply The Sean Hannity Standard To ‘Objective’ Journalists With Hidden Political Ties.

Two wrongs don’t make a right, but this double standard is overwhelming. Hannity makes his pro-Trump, pro-Cohen bias clear. Meanwhile, Jim Sciutto, George Stephanopoulos, Glenn Thrush, Mark Leibovich, and John Harwood pretend to be neutral players despite their ties to Democrats. If Hannity is going to face such scrutiny, so should these so-called “objective” journalists.​

 

No one was after hannity, he wasn’t being scrutinized...it popped up!

 

That tends to happen with Porn Starrs!

Flashback: Clinton Lawyer Represented Tons of Journalists

 

It would sound like boasting. But to deny women do this is being dishonest.

 

Daily Kos readers appear to me to be pretty loyal to the values once so dear to the Stalin branch of communists.

One article targets a NM Democrat woman over her not wanting the failed voter act passed in her state. I thought in her state she was to represent her voters and not force personal views on them? But she supported her citizens so she is now the target.

 

Hannity is 100 percent of the time scrutinized.

 

He was not boasting at all. How can truth be classified as a boast?

 

I would were I in their shoes. Mueller alleges he has named the 12 Russians and hopefully will seek to put them on trial.

 

BY the gov?

 

So the playmate woman had sex with Trump, allowing for her own story, was bedded by Trump the first date and she is a hero for it? She and Stormy Daniels seem cut of the same cloth. Meet them and have sex that day. Both women are nothing for the Democrats to be bragging about. But of you must, sure brag about the two women.

 

The Democrats in the Government .... I think he is.

 

Oh women having sex on the first date is wrong but a married man with a new baby at home is fine.This isn’t about sex, this is about payoff and corruption but you will overlook it

 

Yes it is high crime for an establishment dem or repub not to win a presidential election. Trump committed a crime by beating those bought off candidates. And they have been after him ever since, with some even committing felonies with their leaks intended to weaken trump, a President elected by the people. These same people don't view americans in a good light either. After all, they have not represented these people for decades according to princeton who used congressional record as their hard evidence.

I now understand why the dems have no problem with what princeton evidenced, using congressional record. They don't see the relevance of evidence. It gets in the way of what they believe.

 

Both women were asked if they knew Trump is married. Both said yes. This is not to condone Trump, but funny the women used by the Left are lacking in all the things Trump is blamed for lacking. It amuses me to read this happening.

 

He was the one who made a commitment to his wife. Of course you are condoning Trump because you’re blaming the women. You remind me of the same mentality who blames somebody for wearing expensive jewelry and gets robbed.
No one is defending these women. But he is the one who was committing adultery he is the one your party of family values elected. He is the one who would pay them off for silence. Which is worse? How could you condone this

 

Actually, there is a reason that Hannity might be in the FBI sites due to his very obvious proliferation of Russian created propaganda, but this courtroom fiasco which has screwed him over was all his and Cohen's to own.

 

If you were so stupid to not know that Trump loved him some women throughout lift then that’s on you. Same as JFK, and the same as Clinton. You guys crack me up with your morality codes all of a sudden yet have no issues with guys in the same bathroom as little girls just brilliant.

 

Why of course he had the important duty to his wife. Does this then excuse two women both well aware of the Trump marriage crawling into Trump's bed? They were at his place if you recall. It is not me blaming one side, it is you blaming only one side. I blame both sides. I do not understand at all what this has to do with today and a sitting president. I mean, woman one and two date back a long long time. When Trump had no thought of being president.

Your attack on me is a basic defense of both women. I continue to believe we do have the party of family values. But we do not roast in a burning fire a person ahead of findings of guilt followed by decisions of what comes after guilt.

Democrats would hang Trump by the neck until he is dead is what it seems like to me.

 

He is the one who is president. He is the one who committed adultery while his wife was home with his newborn. He is the one who broke his marital vows,he is the one who paid off women for their silence. What the women did was cheesy....but he is the one who violated his marriage vows. They didn’t .
I find the fact that you say it was a long time ago is your way of justifying his behavior. He was a 60 year old man! He was a creep who boasted about going I to teen age girls locker rooms By the way it was not that long ago that he was paying them off for the silence. And I really have to laugh that you consider your party the party of family values. We have men like Elliot Spitzer and weiner who we Kicked out of the party. You have men like Vitter and Sanford....and you re-elect them! We don’t hold ourselves morally superior that’s why you have a shorter fall to. the gutter. You’re the ones who Impeached Clinton for lying about consensual sex.
When you have a president who refers to women’s ******* and grabbing them against their well then you have no family values. I wonder how you would feel if some man referred to your wife or your daughter I. Such terms. You are not the party family values..you are the party of hypocrites...the party that voted against so many things that would help women,

 

I am going to be laughing my head of if it turn out that Trump had paid for an abortion or two. Wonder how the religion right would deal with that event.

 

Wow, what's wrong with you !

 

u dont think it would be funny if Trump paid for some whore's abortions?

i do.

 

Why my friend as from his lovers we know he is not big into using protection even when he have a wife with a young baby to protect and from a door man it seems there is a good chance that he had gotten at least one of his female employees pregnant in the past.

No reason to not think that there is a good chance that Trump might had paid for a few abortions over the decades.

An given the crazy dance the right wing religion community had been doing to keep supporting him I would love to see the dance they would do if it turn out that he had paid for a few abortions.

 

They all committed adultery. His then newborn son is now 12 years old. I think when Democrats pull such stunts, they do not care at all about the young children in the family much less the presidents wife. Make her miserable they yell as they hurl soaked clubs on fire at her family.

If paid off, they owe him the duty to shut up.

No, time does not justify this. I was trying to say he was not then president.

Oh good grief. You think by tossing the cannon at me you wiped out my cannon balls?

Now you want to drag the entire political spectrum into this.

I am not excusing him. But as said, he was not then president. We are talking of him being president, aren't we?

Clinton in no way was impeached for consensual sex. Democrats say it, but they are not being honest.

Trump alleges the women allowed him to grab them, not that a decent woman would allow it.

Both my daughters can smack a man where he needs it and not bat an eyelash.

We vote to help all of us, not merely women.

OK, you took off the gloves.

I hate the party that was the champion to hold women down. I hate the party that hung blacks and put them on public display with orders to let them rot off the tree. You know, the Democrats. I won't listen to whines saying they finally changed. Not based on their actual deeds they never changed. Sure they got votes so they suckered some into voting for them using promises to help. Sadly they still never helped. Women today allege they get the short end and are not respected. Democrats never lifted a finger to help them get that respect. While you may bleat back it was republicans. Check who ran government from 1932 forward and you will learn fast most of the time the government was run by Democrats.