There is an abundance of genetic proof, and Im sure youve seen it all before. And were you under the impression that Jews arent white?
Quite correct, BroadwayBabe. What it does not sayis the establishment of a Jewish Country/State A homeland is not a country. It caters for the creation of a Jewish Homeland within the country of Palestine. As Rocco aptly called it, a safehaven for Jews in Palestine with full rights for them to become Palestinian citizens. I imagine that you are surprised by these facts, given what we were all led to believe by the Myths.
All of course which is now irrelevant with UN resolutions calling for the creation of a "state" and UN recognition of that state. - - - Updated - - - Yes they are. Were you under the impression that Jews aren't white?
It doesn't say country or State, but homeland. I am not surprised by facts as I know the facts. Anyway, the Jewish people now have their own country and Independence Day is coming up. Very exciting. I love Independence Day and its celebrations. Makes me very very proud.
You need to follow an adjacent thread, Dixon. The UN General Assembly has never been allowed to, and also did not make, new laws. UNGA "181" was nothing more than a recommendation to Britain, made under the Mandate for Palestine which was then in force. And Britain had the only legislative and administrative power over Palestine. The UN had no such power. Here are the two key quotes. You should know them by now: The UN had no such powers to make new legislation. As the legal successor to the League of Nations it only had the power to approve new proposals made by Britain, the Mandatory. And that, Dixon is why "181" has the following very precise wording: Suddenly that weird form all makes sense, right, Dixon? The UN approved NOTHING. Only Britain could give the final "nod". And only Britain could do the implementing. Remember, the Mandate was still in full vigour at the time. But there are two VERY significant wrinkles in this sheet: 1) Was the approval of "181" legal? 2) Who did the implementing? Stop listening to the Myths, Dixon. Read with open eyes.
Is that what you call it when the Zionists drove 750 000 Palestinians from their Homeland in 1948-1950? Full protection of their rights? You need to start to question the Myths, BB. They are crumbling. The internet is the cause.
The 'Zionists' did not drive 750,000 Palestinians out. The left to be out of the way of an impending bloodbath which everyone thought would happen when the new Jewish State would be attacked on all fronts. Even the Arabs have stated that is fact.
they Israelities were not European - they didn't look like this Israeli soldier - (you're a damn liar if you claim anyone in their right mind would identify this girl as Middle Eastern if they met her) they looked like this The problem with Israel is that half of their population is filled with white Europeans who are only Jews by faith. They, and the Jews from North Africa are NOT semites and have no "right of return."
Not sure of your point. Neither can Britain or France in the St Remo Conference make laws effecting the soveriegnty of the area. And of course with Britain abandoning the mandate, like I said, all irrelevant now.
Middle eastern jews cluster closest with european ashkenazi and sefaradic jews. Btw, some ashkenazi jews are middle eastern, the ones that settled in Turkey and Egypt, some even went to Iran centuries ago. But as I have already shown countless times, their genes are middle eastern with some mediterranean european admixture maternally.
That is from zionmania, an anti-semitic site. They took a picture of a jew heavily mixed with northern european blood and a european phenotype and then put it next a yemenite jew, yemenite jews are admixted with arabian and sub saharan african blood. If you put a typical sefaradi jew next an ashkenazi jew, they are indistinguishable. Some ashkenazi jews are even darker than mizrahi jews, and some are just as dark as yemenites because they retained their middle eastern blood. And dictionary.com is not 'zionist propaganda'. Btw, in response to the propaganda of 'ziomania': An ashkenazi jew: A sefaradi jew: So if you want to play the cherry picking game, I can too. Some ashkenazim are very very dark and have high levels of middle eastern dna. You have seen all the genetic studies. Some are much darker than sefaradim and even mizrahim. I am mizrahi, and although most of my family is brown like that ashkenazi kid, some of my aunts and cousins who are mizrahi iraqi kurdish jews have red hair and blue eyes. (North African sefaradim and Kurdish Jews are indistinguishable paternally in terms of genetics.) Sorry to burst your bubble. Anti-zionist propaganda can be so silly some times.
Incorrect. Semite is not a race. Amharic is a semitic language and spoken by ethiopians, along with tigrinya and ancient ge'ez. Semites can be of different races and colors, black, white, and brown. Bashar Al-Assad is a semite and is white/caucasian. Ethiopians are black semites. And same with the black arabs of Sudan, Chad, Somalia, and Djibouti.
all the "evidence" you give me are from Israelis - and their "marker" just goes back to a "Middle Eastern populous around the time of Levant." - but how on earth is this verified ?