I have already many times. You willfully and deceitfully lied about the experiments which you claimed proved the earth was motionless. ou willfully and sinfully lied about the photographic evidence of earth from space being CGI You stated baldfaced lies about the massive evidence IN YOUR FACE about the earth being round for example: one can easily prove that it is night on HALF the earth while day on THE OTHER half WHICH ABSOLUTELY and IRREFUTABLY proves it is round. Your claim that the sun is tiny illuminating only part of it is an out right idiotic lie AND YOU ****ING KNOW IT IS A LIE. Now if you want to be a sinful little satanic fool FINE. If you want to be a christian fool FINE. But stop being a two faced hypocrite
The problem with saying it's due to electromagnetism is that most things aren't attracted to electromagnets, only certain metals. Oh, you say, but this is a special kind of electromagnetism that affects metals and non-metals equally. Well, how is that any different from gravity, besides the fact that you are calling it something else (a name which was already taken and means something else)? As for things like buoyancy: denser, heavier mass sinks below lighter material as an effect of gravity. AS WE ALL KNOW, gravity pulls heavier things downward with more force than lighter things; that's WHY they're heavy. Buoyancy is inextricably linked to gravity, because without gravity, there is no "down" direction for heavier matter to sink to. So by pointing to buoyancy, you are in fact pointing right back to gravity.
The tens of thousands of photos and film taken from space are "CGI", proof of you multi-decade conspiracy involving tens of thousands of people. But none of the internet videos you post are "CGI". Truth is easy to distort when you employ blatant, hypocritical double standards, isn't it?
" heavier mass sinks below lighter material as an effect of gravity." No, heavier mass sinks below lighter material because it is more dense, gravity is not needed in the equation at all.
Without gravity, there is no down direction, so denser material would just as easily "sink" upward, or to the side.
wow you sited the Bible, an old book that's been around for centuries and has yet to be verified, it also has talking snakes, global floods caused by forty days of rain, and other odd and impossible feats, that makes your argument 100% credible. I'm glad I read this, I am now enlightened by god. JK it is funny to read your flat earth rants though, do keep posting them, they are always a bright spot in my day.
It's unfortunate you have no ability to understand the Bible. First you think there is a talking snake, which is the same snake that's in your head, persuading you to do bad things. Yes, we all take a bite of the fruit everyday. We give in. But then you wouldn't understand that. Flat Earth give you some humor does it. Will you be laughing when the flat earth is revealed to the world. They have been planning it since they invented a ball earth. It will side track everything else that will be taking place soon. Good Luck!!!
Ok, one falls off a flat earth, but not upside down on a ball. There ya go. Perhaps you should research the "Antarctic Treaty", Admiral Richard E. Byrd, Wherner Von Braun, Nasa hiring Stanley Kubrick for moon landing (Kubrick Hollywood director best of his time), Operation Fishbowl, Operation High Jump, Operation Mockingbird, Michelson Morley experiment, Airy's Failure, so much more but those are a good place to start. Operation fishbowl was high altitude nuclear detonations performed by Russia and America. The title of the operation is rather unique, "fishbowl". It is not a fishbowl, they was trying to break through the firmament (dome/vault), if they were successful which they was not, it would have created a fishbowl, the top of the dome open.
Wow, that's it? You've got nothing? Pathetic. But just to really grind in your defeat... http://scienceprimer.com/buoyancy So as I said, buoyancy doesn't even make any sense absent gravity. You have been proven wrong. I would say, "nice try" to you, but it really wasn't.
Sorry, but your theories must be provable. You can imagine anything you want. That does not make it so. So, what ARE the exact dimensions of our Earth? Do you have a diagram? If it is flat then it must have an edge, and that edge must have a thickness. Do you believe in airplanes? How about rockets and missiles? How far up away from the surface of the Earth can any machine travel? Please provide ANY photo evidence of a Flat Earth.
Don't quote my post if you're not going to respond to it. This has nothing to with what we were talking about.
If you can't even show a model of your Flat Earth, then you are like person who built his home on shifting sand. Are your Flat Earth beliefs along the lines of these people: http://www.livescience.com/24310-flat-earth-belief.html Do you think there is giant "ice wall" in Antarctica manned by guards to keep people from falling off the edge?
Obviously you have no idea what the United States Military is capable of. If you don't want to watch the entire video, go to 14:45 mark.
Yet another way in which the worldview presented by the OP is patently absurd is this: according to his "theory" of buoyancy, both the sun and the moon would have to be less dense than the lightest air.
I don't think I could take enough LSD for my God given senses to tell me the earth is flat and motionless.
Take a 25lb block of cement, hold it high over your head, let go, and tell us what your God given senses tell you.
Well, I did spend many years in the US Army. Your video was a joke. You could not disprove a single vestige of reality on why the Earth is round and revolves around the Sun. How do you explain a lunar eclipse if the Earth is flat? Would it not cast an oblong or squared shadow depending on if you think the Earth is flat and square or flat and round? Now that humanity knows quite positively that the Moon is not a piece of cheese or a playful god, the phenomena that accompany it (from its monthly cycles to lunar eclipses) are well-explained. It was quite a mystery to the ancient Greeks, though, and in their quest for knowledge, they came up with a few insightful observations that helped humanity figure out the shape of our planet. Aristotle (who made quite a lot of observations about the spherical nature of the Earth) noticed that during lunar eclipses (when the Earth’s orbit places it directly between the Sun and the Moon, creating a shadow in the process), the shadow on the Moon’s surface is round. This shadow is the Earth’s, and it’s a great clue on the spherical shape of the Earth. Since the earth is rotating (see the “Foucault Pendulum” experiment for a definite proof, if you are doubtful), the consistent oval-shadow it produces in each and every lunar eclipse proves that the earth is not only round but spherical – absolutely, utterly, beyond a shadow of a doubt not flat. http://www.popsci.com/10-ways-you-can-prove-earth-is-round#page-2 I've seen this myself many times. How was this faked?
Obviously you have no idea what the United States Military is capable of. If you don't want to watch the entire video, go to 14:45 mark, you'll get your answer there. No, the lunar eclipse is caused by a third celestial body, which causes the eclipses. As early as the time of Pliny, there are records of lunar eclipses happening while both the Sun and Moon are visible in the sky.
Ok, I will do that. Only it won't be over my head, it will be over that nasty ugly cat you have there.
No need. I understand gravity perfectly well. You're the one whose God given senses don't seem to register the concept of gravity.
Find a lake nearby. Let's say 10 kilometers across. Wait for a calm, dark night, with no waves. Have a friend at the other side take a flashlight, and point it at you from the other side. (Preferably, he should also cover the flashlight on all sides not facing you with some black fabric, so you'll not get the reflection from windows or snow nearby and over him, or use a laser instead of a flashlight). Both of you start with a ladder in the water. Your eyes, and his light should be at the same altitude from the surface. (Coordinate this by phone, or radio, or whatever). Then you go gradually lower. Eventually, you can't see the light anymore. Buy your friend a case of beer for the help, and go home, and stay off the internet for a few years. I can't believe the laziness of flat earthers who aren't willing to do this cheap and simple experiment to challenge the idea of a round earth. Maybe they all just lack the friend to hold the flashlight.
